[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: sudosucks.png (134 KB, 1096x886)
134 KB
134 KB PNG
Did you switch from insecure sudo to run0 yet, anon?
>>
>>106965381
Redhat pottering can suck my dick
>>
>>106965434
he literally works for microsoft, yet redhat gets all the praise for systemd's success
>>
>>106965381
Didn't this fuck ruined Linux with his systemd shit and then ran to Microsoft?
>>
>>106965381
I'm tempted to switch back to su - -c desu.
>>
This is a fundamental problem with Unix systems: needing a "root" user who can do everything.
>>
>>106965538
System administration is impossible without this. You're a moron.
>>
>>106965538
>needing
>>
>>106965381
>pedo bear as the profile picture
>>
>>106965576
Real operating systems can give users authorization to specific things without forcing them to be or become a "root" user.
>>
>>106965625
Oh yeah, and how would you grant that permission to a user without also having all permissions as well?
>>
>>106965538
Doesn't Windows basically do the exact same thing with Administrator accounts and UAC?
>>
>>106965625
What are those real operating systems? Android? You can't do shit because of how limited your access is. Windows? You run as a "root" user 24/7.
>>
>>106965381
Shut the fuck up Lennart
>>
>>106965381
I'm dumping any distro that removes sudo
>>
>>106965625
>give users authorization to specific things
This is exactly what sudo does. Just because you have ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL in your sudoers doesn't mean that it's supposed to be like that.
>>
>>106965381
This seems weird to me. Almost like systemd is a backdoor
>>
>>106965926
Then it's not bad, but most people just have normal users with normal privileges vs root who can do anything instead of specific users with additional authorization and privileges.
>>
>>106965625
>give users authorization to specific things without forcing them to be or become a "root" user.
That's exactly what sudo does, you nuclear dipshit.
>>
suid isn't a big deal. Having a large number of suid binaries is a bad idea, but having a single program that is known to be well written and needs suid for it's core functionality isn't an issue. There are only a few issues eg env vars that specifically relate to being suid, instead of being exposed by any program that lets unprivileged users control a root process. Eg any time a user can tell a root program to write a file you have to make sure it won't overwrite /etc/passwd. This really has nothing to do with suid, but it's frequently discovered in random programs that only need suid for some incidental functionality. Replacing sudo with something simpler is a good idea, run0 is a crap replacement that adds a bunch of security theatre for no benefit. I was on board, because I have systemd anyways I might as well let it handle sudo, until I discovered that.
>>
>>106965381
>OpenBSDs sudo replacement called doas
But sudo is also still an OpenBSD project
>>
>>106965625
Haha, why are you here?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.