i have an algo that generates thousands of children's booksthey're good books btw, not ai slopwell i mean yeah i'm uing chatgpt but it's not your typical ai slopgonna sell em on amazonlater losers, gonna post here again in a year when i got my lambo
>>106970970o algo
>>106971374>implying i'd ever tell youkek
The main appeal of children's books it that they are physically printed and handed to children. Are you printing them?
>>106971521>The main appeal of children's books it that they are physically printed and handed to children.also drawings, and good ones too
>>106970970Shit dude, you better get moving, the time for this was like 3 months ago.
>>106971521idk man there's a step by step process to publish to the kindle store. ai childrens book slop is super common but trust me mine is different. it's educational
>>106971975>>106971558>>106971541honestly i can write the text by myself (or with ch4tgpt) i just need the bot to m4ke the pictures
>>106970970>generates books.no it doesn't.it recycles books.those are two different things.the clue is in the name GENerate GENesis. a generation transmutes, it doesn't recycle.when you make a woman pregnant, you didn't recycle other babies to make a new baby. right?thats actual genesis. taking small things and making something greater out of them. but you don't taking the same thing, chew it up and re-mold it.all artists are guilty of some degree of recycling their influences, even if it is subconscious but at least there are subgenres made.AI-men should make their own artistic disciplines instead of recycling everything else like gigantic combiners.focus on what makes AI art unique instead of copying everything.make some goofy or crazy shit instead of doing some boring shit like childrens books (which you don't do anyway because using prompts requires about as much writing as writing a list of books that you like.people are not stupid, after the novelty has worn off, they don't settle for whatever.who in their right mind is going to buy ai generated books to their kids?
>>106972453your brain recycles the garbage your senses take in, retard. nothing we humans do is original either. it just seems original because our brains are orders off magnitude more powerful than gpt5
>>106972466thats what i implied already if you care reading for a second.>all artists are guilty of some degree of recycling their influences, even if it is subconscious but at least there are subgenres made.
>>106972484>thats what i implied already if you care reading for a second.that's funny because i didn't read your whole commentlmaooooo
>>106970970>i have an algo that generates thousands of children's booksawesome
>>106972489he needs help pay that settlement
