And hash algorithm? Are certain ones faster than others to encrypt/create volumes?
i always choose ur mom's gaping hole, data miner
>>106971681Can't you target the server which contains the Epstein client list instead?
>>106971681you don't ever need anything more complicated than AES, unless you want asymmetric, which if you're asking such a stupid question, you don't
i use 7zip aes256 for encryption, then i open the archive in a hex editor and remove some of the data to a log file.this corrupts the encrypted archive to the point where it doesn't even take the (potentionally keylogged) password anymore. intention CRC/EOF error
What's the point using it on Windows (a closed source operating system)?
>>106971681I use bitlocker. I don't mind the glowies looking at my porn because they have to keep it a secret, it doesn't affect my life in any way.
>>106971719This. AES is the most studied cicpher in the world. You are almost infinitely more likely to be compromised by bad OPSEC than AES itself.
>>106971688Which one is that?
>>106971739Doesn't this still show the content of your files?
>>106971681CPUs have AES hardware support, anything else will likely be way slower.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES_instruction_setSo use AES if you need your drive to not be sluggish
>>106971681AES so that I can securely encrypt my chinese poetry while having good read speeds
>>106973026just the filenames
>>106973026>>106973624you can encrypt file names
rot16
>>106971681Cryptographic hashes are slow by design to hinder brute forcing.
>>106971681use case for full disk encryption?
