ITS HAPPENING
>AI replacing jobs>IT'S LE GOOD BECAUSE...BECAUSE IT JUST IS, OKAY?
is that advertisement just a collage of ai generated black kings
>>106972203the ai bubble is bursting, finally
>>106972203>Meta hires AI team>AI team makes AI that can make code>Meta can now fire AI teamshocking!
alexandr wangbros...
>>106972203AI is the ultimate jeet killer
>check /biz/>they are talking about some fake meat companygo back to sleep AGI will be here shortly
meta was terrible at AI though? Like this is for the shitty mobile chatbot in fb chats right
>>106972203This is not the bubble bursting. Llama-4 was a massive flop and they failed to put out anything to compete with the likes of DeepSeek or Qwen after that.Look out for OpenAI or Google laying off people.
>>106972343They were the ones who started giving us good open source model while openai refuse to before China took over that role
>>106972368>implying llms will amount to anything else than a search engineyangmialso non-shit programming ai solutions already exist.its code generated based on mbd, but obviously you aint gonna hear about that, fanboistuff that actually works doesnt need investor hype to be profiablepicrel showcases statistical models limitations.the optimal solution gets lost in the mountains of slop to the point of becoming statistically insignificant.
>>106972203Fire everyone that wanted to, or did, censor it.
>>106972518I recommend the opposite.
>>106972447i don't even see the value of llms as a search engine replacement outside of the most general "what is an elephant" type questions. i already have to verify that whatever i pull from search engine results is reliable, having to verify that the llm is accurately summarizing its source and then still having to verify the source itself is just more work for me.
>>106972533You are an agent of chaos.
>>106972541ive got pretty good results when using llms as cross referencing machines. also i like the human interface which allows me to just explain what im looking for, instead of doing my searches the old fashioned waybut i would never trust em to generate code. they suck at it. an llm is not designed for that kind of workload, so obviously its gonna give shit resultsand, yeah. one has to verify results, when its not something pulled straight from a manual
>>106972236Are you blind, retard?
>>106972203Are they going to replace their AI team with AI?Is AI finally devouring itself?
>>106972797nah, they just scrapped a future-less divisionfaceberg is still a webshitterhow can anybody take him or his company seriously?
>>106972203>hire 100K AI engineers>I sleep>fire 600 of themNOOOOO YOU CANT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>106972203>replace millions of jobs with ai>get replaced with ai yourself who could have predicted this???
>>106973660stop watching reddit
>>10697367090% of my forum time is spent on 4chan unfortunately.the bubble is popping,
>>106973698yeah, well, the bubble thing was to be seen from a mile away'wouldnt be the case if llms could do half of what theyre advertised as>be 300B company>have 3B in reveue>just give me 100 years to start earning money on your investment, bro
>>106972203Aren't they the ones that have like $100m per year salaries?
>>106973926in stock options*
