[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 185628372842.png (745 KB, 642x642)
745 KB
745 KB PNG
If a traditional quartz watch were powered by a modern lithium batteries like the 300–600mAh cells from modern day smartwatches. How much longer would they last?
>>
>>106974271
About 10 or 20× by capacity. Practically, Li‑ion self‑discharge/BMS would cap it to only a few years (~3–6 years), not decades.
>>
>>106974271
My 10-year lithium battery watch from 2007 is still going strong. The technology is already there.
>>
>>106974271
>Metal pliers
>Shorting the battery poles.
>>
>>106976333
*tweezers.
>>
>>106974271
>Summer
Clock gets warm and the modern lithium battery discharges
>Winter
Clock gets cold and the modern lithium battery discharges



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.