[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1758679145270798.png (114 KB, 309x355)
114 KB
114 KB PNG
people so stubbornly insist that adding dlss to helldivers 2 will improve their fps even though it's a cpu-bound game
>>
>>>/v/catalog
>>
>>106983458
no
>>
>>106983447
It most certainly isn't CPU limited at every setting, and with every GPU.
>>
>>106983559
So you think a GPU that would be weak enough to benefit from dlss in helldivers 2 would be paired with a CPU that would be powerful enough to handle the extra overhead that comes with dlss? a 9800x3d paired with what, a 1060?
>>
>>106983619
There is no way in hell a 5060 Ti could run the game at 4K Ultra without it being the bottleneck.
>>
>>106983683
Can an rtx pro 6000 run the game at 16k without being the bottleneck?
>>
>>106983447
go back to /v/ faggot



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.