What's the best antivirus for Linux?
>>106988789Common sense
>>106988789You're brain
i just rip ass, smell it and then whatever my brain thinks of it i decide if something is a virus or not
>>106988789sandboxing your browser
>>106988789I just assume I don't have any. Same reason I don't go to the doctor.
Linux was created by a programmer god, it isn't vulnerable to virii
>>106988789haha OP I love froggo XD
>>106988789ClamAV.The engine is pretty solid, but you'll want to augment the fingerprint lists with the fingerprints for the things the commercial vendors are not allowed to scan for.But really, with *nix, if you're doing that right you should worry more about how the infection arrived on system, and how it got rights to execute beyond the logged in user's privs.>>106988989I do hope that funnin'>>106989067Evidence suggests otherwise>>106989080And that is why you fail.
>>106989080shut the fuck up retardwe're watching you
>>106988789What's the best provirus for linux?
>>106989080Why does Pepe make /g/ seethe so much
There're some antivirus but realistically they're shit and retarded.If you software supply chain got compromised an AV can't tell apart spyware from official softwareIf you're executing random binaries then you are the virusIf you stupid .sh obliterates your data then you're the problemIf you antivirus gets infected then you don't have to worryNot acting retard and giving excessive privileges is the solution. If you're paranoid then use wireshark that is better than any antivirus.
>>106989145Retarded users.>>106989169Probably because there's only one type of spastic that's stupid enough to use it, and after advertising what they are, the deserved hatred follows.>>106989175>If you antivirus gets infected then you don't have to worryDoes that level of retardation come naturally, or have you required to practise?>If you're paranoid then use wireshark that is better than any antivirus.Utter bollox. A protocol analyzer is no substitte. There is no way you'll be decrypting, let alone analyzing a datastream in a usable timeframe. You are so full of shit.
>>106988789Linux is the virus. You install it, realize there’s no software and feel like an idiot for falling for it. Then for no reason at all, you decide to propagate the suffering to others by evangelizing linux all day every day to others. If a person has a low immunity to propaganda, they’ll catch the linux virus. There’s no known cure once you become freetarded either.
>>106989290Give up. Linux is good once you know how to install software.
>>106988789Computer viruses are like STDs.If you catch one, it's because you did something really fucking stupid.
>>106989264>or have you required to practise?20 years of daily practice is what you need to detect the obvious sarcasm.To make wireshark somewhat usable you have to silence most of your connections. You have more automatized options. Trying to detect supply chain attack with an AV is kinda a waste of time... and downloading random binaries is the usual behavior of win users asking for an AV.>There're should be some kind of integrated CVE notifier in linux but that's another matter.
>>106989374>To make wireshark somewhat usable you have to silence most of your connections.Or filter the output.But the point is, with the size of an average website nowadays - which is transferred encrypted - you've got a lotta piecing together to get anywhere near a picture. Using wireshark to poke through an isolated instance, sure. All your traffic? You might get to read last month's headlines in a few weeks time.>Trying to detect supply chain attack with an AV is kinda a waste of time..Malicious code should be malicious code. How and where it comes from shouldn't matter to an AV engine. Most of these things fall over by matching fingerprints. You need a fingerprint to match. Arguably, detection upstream should catch this before you can and it should never make it down to you, but it relies heavily on knowing to look for it...>downloading random binaries is the usual behavior of win users asking for an AV.Which brings me to my next point on the fingerprints, a lot will diagnose things that are not malicous as hostile, because they circumvent some protection measure that threatens someone's profit, whilst completely failing to diagnose something malicious, because that would threaten someone's profit, or agenda. This leads to an environment where the avg win user *wouldn't* know what is *safe* to trust... So as a default they execute everything, regardless, because it's pretending to offer the functionality they want...>There're should be some kind of integrated CVE notifier in linux That should be on your distro maintainer's heads. They should track vulnerabilities for the projects they maintain, and roll out as part of regular updates... Or that's how it works for me.
>>106989298You cannot install that which does not exist.
Security updates from your distro.
there is only one i know of clamav and its mosly used for email cleanin on servers
Windows 7 is more secure than Loonix.
>>106991083Im going to set nmap to random and have it scan for windows 7 computers for free bots. >:3
>>106988789user behavior
>>106988789apt-get install common-senseez
apt-get install common-sense
>>106988789>Linux>Viruses... wat
>>106991083no
>>106991524Theyre paying extra attention now
>>106991083Sure, Win7 is "secure" in the same way your virginity is "secure" because nobody wants it. Back to /g/old/ with your shill posts.
>>106988789The way you're going to be rekt on linux is if a repo gets compromised, in which case antivirus isn't going to do jack shit fuck all for you by then anyways. This isn't something worth worrying about, just store data on a separate drive with backups and prep to have to reinstall from scratch.
I miss getting viruses and adware the Windows XP as a kid with napster kazaa era was golden for learning how computers worked, by continuously fucking up your machine and having to fix it over and over and over
sudo apt install big-milf-titties.exe
