[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1735082042404977.jpg (45 KB, 1200x628)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
Many proprietary messaging apps claim to use end-to-end encryption, but does it actually matter if the source code isn't available? What's stopping it from generating keys in a predictable matter or simply uploading it to the server?
>>
>>106989371
what's stopping me from using gpg for everything?
okay i admit i send cleartext when your mom comes calling for a weekend "visit"
>>
>>106989371
>Many proprietary messaging apps claim to use end-to-end encryption, but does it actually matter if the source code isn't available?
No. And even if the source is available, unless you're reviewing the code yourself and compiling it yourself it doesn't matter. It is trivial to back door an open source app that is on the app store.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.