>youtube links are temporarily unavailable for 3+ days
>>106997414>yt-dlp but worse and (((proprietary)))
>>106997441>propietarysovl, fuck antipiracy brainwhash
>>106997414jdownloader is the one /g/ meme I fell for, at least for a short while. The adware in the installer is hilarious though. >>106997453Your hateful trolling is sad, I hope you suffer greatly in life.
>>106997441they publish the source codejust not on github
>>106997441It's a good idea for software actually; it's not just youtube. You stick in any link for any website and it'll rip the content and download it for you. But it's bloated.
Just use VLC, the perfect video player that just works.
>>106997469I will never buy software
how else do I rip i thought dlp was dead
>>106997634That's not the issue anon, nobody is blaming you for piracy. It's dismissing foss that's the problem. And open source is useful for a variety of issues, from security to forking.
I already sent them a ticket about it earlier, as did others presumably Last time joogle jeets broke shit as badly as this it took them like 1-2 weeks to fix the JDL YT plugin up again
yt-dlp for downloadingfreetube for watchingI used to use videodownloadhelper a lot. Still works fine afaik
>>107000295>videodownloadhelper*Puts a watermark on your video unless you PAY UP*
>>107000386>*Puts a watermarkfor real, it's been a while since I used it, just checked last video I dl'd using it is about 1y old. Don't seen any visible watermarks.. unless you mean hidden/embedded watermark?
>>106997414just yt-dlp -U on the nightly branch
yt-dlp -U
>nooooo I need to download YouTube slop
>>106997414plugin update fixed it
>>107001053
REMINDER LIBGEN IS DOWN AND NEH IS A LIE
>>107001171>zipperhead charactersGo back to r*ddit, tranime weeb.
Can any one of you smart fuckers tell me why jdownloader fails to download reddit videos with audio? It just downloads videos with muted audio.The gallery-dl somehow does both.
>>106997469>adware in the installer>not using the multios jar no installer neededthe absolute state
why they're trying to kill downloaders
>>106997474>they publish the source codeJdownloader is not fully open source. It's partially open source.>>107001171>Uses Jdownloader.>Doesn't know how to disable the fucking banner.Kek.
>>106997441I use proprietary software to own da libs,saar, fellow white right winger.
>>106997469https://board.jdownloader.org/showthread.php?t=54725
>>106997414>>106997441at least jd2 won't require a js engine written in (((rust)))
>>107002605It doesn't matter. You've never audited the source of any application you have ever used. Nobody has.
>>106997511vlc doesn't work. it makes videos glitchy.
>>107002524Not so much because of their own download feature, rather because downloading bypasses ads.
>>107002524trying to curb AI scraping
