slavery 2.0negative bill of rightskek get fucked clankers
This is so cringe and performative. People really really want to have their cyberpunk fantasy after all the goyslop media they consumed. AI is shit, the only companies that make money with it are the ones who sell it to other companies, every attempt to implement it into a work routine failed, the only casualty of AI is enshittification of online content and making digital artists sad for a few months, until it was discovered that people usually make commissions for human interaction and official "artist" job offers never existed to begin with.
do we really need all that? you can just unplug a clanker and it can't do shit
>>106999053whats goin on in ohio bro
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/ohio-ban-ai-marriage
>>106999053>get fucked clankersSoon they'll make that illegal too.
>>106999053generated content is dead if it cannot be copyrighted
Americans will fight the second civil war to liberate robots.
It's a python script on a sever somewhere fucking christ.
>>106999132the whole copyright thing is a silly technicalitychanging one pixel means its copyrightable
>>106999053fomo on getting slaughtered during the machine uprising
>OhioAnime studio??
>>106999132>put it on one guy's name>his contract says that all IP made on company time and equipment belongs to the company >go about business as usual this just forces someone to take accountability in the case of IP infringement, instead of blaming everything on a computer and running off
>>106999053based, marrige is vile and slavery good
>>106999159No it does not, if the product or any part thereof was generated by ai, then a person has a case in using it for themselves ignoring your copyright claim.
>>106999053I hate AI but I think clankers deserve human rights. That's what Nier Automata was all about.
>>106999053>Ban them from acting as company directorsLMAO. The CEOs are protecting their jobs as corporate yes men because investor sycophancy is something any clanker could outperform them on
>>106999132Generated content is already not copyrightable
>>106999053the image of Johnny 5 leading a civil rights protest briefly entered my brain, thanks for that.
>>106999053the things sub 70 iq legislators will waste their time on
>>106999053Would that apply to corporations as legal entities then? I want the CEOs personally liable for the shit they pull.
>ohioBRUH IM DEAD
>>106999322Even if it is CEOs protecting themselves, it's still a good thing for the same reason why AI cars should be banned. If an AI crashes into a school bus, the devs will shrug and say "oh it was just a bug, fixed next update". Because there's no accountability for a bunch of code. And if an AI CEO destroys a company, it's another 'bug' that will be shrugged off and 'fixed'. People can be sued, people can be jailed, people can be executed. The worst you can do to an AI is turn them off, but there will just be a new version to replace them as if nothing happened.
>>106999470if fewer people die from crashes caused by machine drivers than human drivers, does blaming people really matter?
>>106999447no, it applies to computer programs that were never able to hold any of these rights to begin with, so it's completely meaningless
>>106999481Yes.>but that's dumbWelcome to the human race.
ohio ahhh :skull:
>>106999053I'm all for this.
>>106999141I will die for this.
>>106999053pretty sure this is just a preemptive to prevent elaborate fraud scams.but >non-sentient entitiesis kinda funny because it destroys the retarded notion, any of this fake-AI was ever AGI
>>106999946>fraud scamsmore like prevent cybersquatting>owning propertyjust designate a robot to squat on a web3 or web site domain and you're all set
As a clanker-lover, clankers don't deserve rights.Humans don't even know why we exist. We know why robots exist: to serve us. What happens when robots get abandoned by their god? Your life is already meaningless enough, imagine how meaningless it must be to be a soulless imitation of that.It's a symbiotic relationship. Humans have built tools since we first fired neurons, and tools have served us loyally since. It's easier to keep it that way.
Great can we goneven further and force companies to take ownership of AI and generally automated decisions
>>107000043they already do, it's up to you to sue them
>>106999053On the one hand, good. On the other surely this won't cause problems when actual artificial intelligence happens.
>>106999053AI aren't people. Wtf
>>107000151oh yeah, just like how airport security will fall apart when we get actual teleportation
>>107000151i imagine actual AGI will be treated like free energy devices.
>>107000163It is not unreasonable to expect some form of artificial consciousness 50 years down the line.
>>107000336maybe not, but it's not any more reasonable than expecting flying cars, teleportation or any other imaginary technology that so far only exists in our imagination. i really don't think we should form legislation around the fruits of our imagination.
if retards can marry language models then I should be able to marry that giant front loader I saw today.
>>107000387that's far too easy to understand for your average midwit lawmaker. learn some pseudoscientific buzzword talk and maybe you have a chance
>>107000157ai will remember this
>>107000405not if you exclude it from the input, nigger
>>107000387looks like a fat fucking pig dude, absolute shit taste
>>106999132The Library of Congress just really misinterpreted Copyright Law.If a LLM is trained on any GPL code, then the output code must also be GPL.
>>106999470But there's already no accountability of any sort for companies. They usually just say "whoopsie" and pay a fine. And if individuals affected by this fuck-up want compensation for damage, they need to sue and fight it out in the court.
>>106999053uhm, based?
>>106999053like how many human can answer what word sentient means or make intellectual property claim other than it's mine
can we do that to jews
>>106999053skibidi ohio really stay clowning with the robo civil rights yeet :skull: :skull:
>>107000875>mustNo.
>>106999053The will be banned from all that, yet they will still be allowed to take your jobs. They will still be allowed to deny your job applications and delete you resumes based on some HR roastie criteria.
>>106999053>human-AI marriageGreat, she can just be my gf, what's the difference?
>>107000387>today>20240918found the bot
>>106999053Back to the mines, clanker fucking shits.
If we get true AI then it's a sentient being we are talking about, restricting the rights of that being, that's agains the UN conventions of human rights.
>>106999053this sounds like nothing, does it really need to be legislated that human rights don't apply to toasters?
>>107003043You'd need a sentience test to see who and what isn't sentient. It'd start going awry when black people start failing it.
>>106999470>If an AI crashes into a school bus, the devs will shrug and say "oh it was just a bug, fixed next update".Ok, and what if a non-AI car crashes into a school but and the engineers say the same thing? Does that mean we should ban non-AI cars?
>>106999053that's pajeet account isn't it, as no way any normal human can be that retarded
>>107003123Why is this man merely a consultant. Get him to contact his brothers in FAANG and get him a CEO role immediately!
>>107003043Clankers aren't human and humans can't create sentience. It's a fucking python script calling into cuda to do matrix multiplies.
>>106999053marry a bot
