Serious question. I've used both for years, and the whole "linux is more secure" thing feels like a cope from the 90s.On Windows, you get Windows Defender which is unironically decent now, plus all the big AVs are built for it. Everything is sandboxed and signed. It's locked down for normal people.On Linux, you're copy-pasting random curl commands from some guy's blog, installing AUR packages maintained by who-knows-who, and disabling SELinux because some random program breaks.It feels like the average linux user's machine is a wide open backdoor just waiting to happen, all for the "freedom" to rice their desktop. Am I wrong here? It just seems like a massive security downgrade for 99% of people.
>>107000133haha OP I love froggo XD
