What are you maids working on?Last one: >>106982750
>maidnigger just waits for the previous thread to die to immediately post his maidnigger shit as the OPand you cultists wonder why no one likes you
>>107003906The non-maid /dpt/ fell off the catalog hours ago due to lack of interest. Non-maid /dpt/ is only sustainable when glowies are paid to post in it and currently the US government is still shut down. This is why the thread has been 90% more civil and on topic.Maid /dpt/ always hits the bump limit because maids see the OP and come to participate. Given that the anti-maid glowies are currently living the NEET life, this is a good time for maids to enjoy themselves by discussing advanced Mathematics and Computer Science research with less disruptions.The subject of this maid /dpt/ is the book "A Study in String Processing Languages". Please find a copy from your favorite archive site and enjoy reading about String Processing.
>>107004134>/maidpt/>mental retardation central
>>107004183>important maid computer research:>posting aislopi think ive got my fill of mental retardation for the moment
>>107004200If maids were posting AI slop it would be cuter and more moe and maid themed. Not some guy being mean to robots. Androids should not look like anthropomorphic iPhones. They should look like cute maids with huge boobs.
>>107003906>>107004085>>107004091>>107004096>>107004105>>>/b/Go be a dumb swarthoid elsewhere.
>>107004200
>>107003819
my downloader program is coming along nicely
Thank you janny for cleaning the thread. Here are more math and CS papers for maids. Please browse them at your leisure:>https://webspace.ship.edu/msrenault/divisibility/StupidDivisibilityTricks.pdf>https://www.robertgaskins.com/files/gaskins-gould-cal-snobol4-1972.pdf>https://ftp.regressive.org/snobol/misc/ftp.cs.arizona.edu/gb.pdf
>>107004525>janny sucking himself off
>>107004525>>107004488>>107004510>>107004223>>107004006botted the thread again award
>>107003819How to get an Asuna wife?
>>107004510
I've decided to do some side project because I was bored and now I get why people do hobby projects. It is fucking blissful to be able to just code and learn without having to worry about delivering on time.
>>107004541maybe her papa or uncle passed away and maid threads were transferred to her
>>107004510>>107004624What did you make this in?
>>107004134CLEAN IT UP JANNY
>3 1/2 hours old>not a single post about programmingOP fucking sucks at baking. Fuck you, OP.
>>107005668Do you think the threads would be better if the OP contained a link to some code to discuss and play with for the thread? I am open to suggestions for improvements, but I can't actually compel people to participate.
>>107004200https://www.youtube.com/shorts/IQHjhBq7cwE
>>107005358
>>107005883
haskell
>>107005963so true
Been working on rewriting this thing to be cross platform and not rely on external Windows only tools from the late 90's in my spare time.
>>107003906fpbp
>>107004006>A Study in String Processing LanguagesI am implementing some of the matchers listed in the second chapter of this book in Java.
I'm better than you. You all suck.
>>107006896I now have a very simple handcoded backtracking pattern recognizer. It is based on the SNOBOL4 patternd described in the first couple chapters and is not capable of side-effects. I am going to try to implement the language described in the book.
how do i get a /dpt/ bf?
>>107005793>Do you think the threads would be better if the OP contained a link to some code to discuss and play with for the thread?Not really. It'd just be a pile of shit usually that everyone would take a big dump on; they can make other threads if that's the sort of humiliation ritual they want.I guess with that I ought to contribute. Writing C macros to make iterating over a hash table trivial and applying them to a large codebase. Which is easy, except I keep getting distracted with non-programming stuff.
haskell for virgin chudslisp for sex havers
>>107007878this, lispfags btfo
>>107005793It'd be better if the OP contained a screenshot of code they wrote.
>>107008381Screenshots of code aren't useful, and aren't as nice to look at as maids.
>>107007650>backtracking regex engines are BAD>backtracking pattern recognizers that work in the same manner are GOOD
>>107008381fucking this
in cmake how are you expected to add source files / headers that are located in sub folders purely for the sake of code organization and not because they are libraries or because of any sort of structural reasons with the project. I basically want the contents of these subfolders to be the equivalent as if they were in the root of the project (they can include headers located "above" them or in an adjacent sub folder for example)
>>107003819Thoughts on the Elixir language?
This nigger is actually trolling me.
>>107008692this is what you deserve
>>107008423I don't actually have a strong opinion about backtracking. I just thought it was fun to implement. The book goes on to describe a language called Summer and I might try to implement it.
>>107008832Well if you enjoy this, I recommend you look at perl/pcre backtracking regex engines afterwards. It's hardcore.You start with simple alternations, then simple quantifiers implemented with a stack (not using recursion) is already a bit of a mindfuck. Then it gets more complex with "procedure" patterns/recursive patterns, backtracking control (via quantifier modfiers, lookarounds, independent patterns, (explicit) backtracking control verbs: (*PRUNE) (*COMMIT), etc...)).
>>107005883Too bad that the multiplatform IDE only can run on Windows.
how do we save OOP?
>>107009968Right click, Save.
>>107009977you think this is a joke? OOP is fucking dying and you're making jokes?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKjUd7DAqCo
>>107009988kunyetsa erwy pachemu Go rast ryyact i dlyatov
>>107009997spazzibba nigga but I don't speak r*ssian
>>107010014Me neither that's what your video title says.
C++ worth learning in 2025?
>>107004134>invents bipedal robot>hasn't invented replacement for squatting toilet
>>107009988you vill be functional
The language should have simple modules/namespaces to group your functions, so you would use classes only when you need classes. No inheritance. Have abstract classes/interfaces.
>>107010225>>107009968
>>107010048if you're interested in areas where C++ is used (large, complex + performance reqs like robotics, video games, browsers, car software, etc), then yespersonally I would rather save my sanity and do something else
>>107009968Ban inheritance.All problems today are caused by QuantumParticle inherits from Atom inherits from Molecule inherits from Cell inherits from Organism inherits from Human inherits from Life inherits from Earth inherits from Planet inherits from Moon inherits from Tire inherits from Rubber inherits from TyreRubber inherits from TyreRim inherits from Differential inherits from Axle inherits from Car inherits from Driver inherits from Galaxy inherits from Star inherits from Universe inherits from Multiverse inherits from SpaceTime
Maybe this belongs in /stupid questions/ but I decided to sign up at my local CC for programming classes for Spring, just to do something during the nighttime. The last time I programmed was with C++, in high school, in 2006 but I liked it (yes I am old). The three courses recommended these books but don't require them, are any of them worth keeping or not? Ignore the Linux one, the school store sent it by mistake.
>>107010048C++ is a language where the footguns have footguns. Seriously many ways to fuck up when writing it, and not all of them involve getting crashes or the wrong results; for example, it's tremendously easy to write code that makes far too many copies of things, and not know that you've done it other than wondering "why is my code so slow?"Learn it if you need to, but be aware that it's slow to build and you'll need to debug it a lot.
>>107010225yay haskell
>>107010407>The three courses recommended these books but don't require them, are any of them worth keeping or not?Read them (at least partially) and form your own opinion.The C++ one is worth keeping if you're going to keep on using that language on a regular basis, as that's written by the language creator.You probably don't need two Python books.
>>107010407Programming language books are useless, you can learn a new PL in 2h if you already know one. It's knowing how to program that's complicated. Start to programming something, anything, and look at the language docs/reference anytime you need it.
>>107010493>you can learn a new PL in 2h if you already know oneyou can learn a new PL very badly in 2hknowing how to use a PL well takes more effort, as they all have quirks and non-standard features; those are often the bits where the special sauce is, why you're learning that language in the first place
>>107010515sure, but I mean in 2h you can learn every primitive you need to implement any program: the operators, the basic types, control flow, function, the primitive data structures, etc..
