>x doesn't work >you don't need x anyway Why is this so common in freetard circles?
works on my machine
you don't need photoshop when you got gimp
formerly twitter?
>>107003820i say this to make people on the internet mad
>>107003820Most freetards have only surface level undarstanding. They like to think highly of themselves, they're so private, they have full control of their machine and shit.The truth is they can't help so they cope when faced with their own incompetence.
>>107003820We're seeing this now with people running outdated versions of Windows>You don't need anything that won't run Windows XP anyway
>>107003878You don't need the internet and you don't need to be mad
>>107003968Usecase for anger?
>>107003964Not really. There are plenty of projects to extend the level of application support for old windows versions, which means the legacy windows community is acknowledging the problem unlike freetards which just ignore it because "we're volunteers and don't owe you anything, sweaty"
>>107003820https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fox_and_the_Grapes
>>107003820Some people like to force their views and beliefs on others. It's quite common, maybe 20% of people I'd say.A few examples:-people nitpicking on your grammar or spelling.-the car repair guy not doing exactly what you want cause he think you're a push over.-the leftist demanding you respect the flavor of the month rule.-someone writing a doc with only the bare minimum of info ("they should be able to understand of they're stupid").-the bus driver forcing you to get on the front door even though it's crowded, he's late and there's 2 other doors.-the cyclist refusing to move around you.-the pedestrian walking slowly on purpose.-the waiter belittling you when you order "wrongly" (may be french specific).-the open source guy insisting you use his retarded bug tracker even though you told him about a bug through mail/reddit/discord.-inflexible administrative clerk that want you to respect the procedure perfectly.Some people, the majority I belive, are chill and acommodating thanksfully.
>>107003820my favorite is>if you're even asking this you've done something wrongjust tell me the fucking answer.
>>107003820yet another classic thread from year 2001
>>107003820>x doesn't work>you don't need x anywayWhy is this so common in corporate fanboy circles?
>>107003820>>107003833The implication is that it's Linux fualt that it's not working when it's adobe going above and beyond to make it incompatible.The actual point is that since they are being Jews about it I don't NEED it that badly. I can get by with the alternatives
>>107003820X11 is going away, the future is Wayland, boomer.
>>107003820gato sexo
>>107003820>x doesn't work >you don't need x anyway>just use Y>start using Y>ask a question about it>dude why are you using Y, just use X
>>107006248>oh, you want to do x? just use this nix flake>you need help making the flake work? don't use flakes they aren't official.
>>107004631nah, in corporate it's reverse>x doesn't work>use x anyway>we don't need y>pay for y anyway
this ip is still banned from /tv/ for 2 days, so i'm posting cats and promoting open source software.libreoffice is the goat.gimp? i'm simping for it.vlc is god's gift to mankind.
>>107006440That's a big dog
>>107006440vlc is the devils spawn
>>107003820Are they wrong? There are atlernatives to 'x'. Just because you are too emotionally attached to 'x' to learn a new program doesn't mean that the alternatives are bad.
So I began tuning Gemma on my own cleaned up logs like I said I was going to do.But there seems to be one crucial issue and that is that I am able to fit much less context at training time than I am at inference time. This short context finetuning is hurting the long context performance at inferennce time, which is very unfortunate, because it's not like I am able to have generous amounts of context to begin with when serving the model using llama-factory.
