[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: starlink.jpg (106 KB, 2048x1152)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
So I can get higher internet from satellite than fiber from the city, eh?

Pics related,
>median DL speed across the entire network
210Mbps (up from 140Mbps just 10 months ago)
>median UL speed
30 Mbps (up from 20mbps)
>median latency
~20 ms (down from 30-40ms)
>>
>>107005235
This entirely depends on the fiber in your city
Kind of of a rare case to have fiber but only have 100mbps-200mbps.
That as the case 10 years ago if you had a really early fiber deployment but a weird case today
Either way I personally wouldn't trade a stable and quality 100mbps fiber connection for Starlink. If your internet is even lower then that then you can threaten them with switching over and maybe get a better connection.

Starlink is otherwise extremely situational, it's fantastic compared to DSL or even some really shitty cable connectors and it works better the farther out you are from the city
>>
>>107005337
World Fiber speed average is ~200Mbps, US is ~220Mbps for Fiber speed avg. That means half of the fiber users are under that.
>>
>>107005405
Average real speed is different from what's available, when fiber first came to the aera, 100mbps was a max they where willing to give
If you have 100mbps-200mbps as the highest teir package and is ludicrously expensive, that is kinda weird
>>
>>107005235
Fiber is cheaper and unaffected by weather.
>>
>>107007815
Ehh, each winter, the snow knocks over fiber pole and you're left without internet for a day or two.
>>
>>107005235
Fibre can do internet 25Gbit/s easely.
>>
File: 1700974055706796.jpg (133 KB, 700x828)
133 KB
133 KB JPG
some people are shilling the soon-to-be-implemented v3 satellites which apparently would push the whole network closer to a whole gigabit
but too late, since my local got full fiber (and they didn't even notify me)
>>
>>107005235
Definitely not. I have Starlink at my holiday lodge, it's just awful desu. Not as bad in shit weather as people might suspect, but random drops etc are daily. Suddenly YouTube switches to 144p or something for 30 minutes.

It just sucks... I'd prefer slower wired for consistency and latency.
>>
>>107008496
If you've having consistent problems like that, you either live in eskimo land or have a setup issue.
>>
>>107008496
>Suddenly YouTube switches to 144p or something for 30 minutes
>holiday lodge
Thats roaming plan, which is deprioritized. So when bandwidth crunch happens during peak usage hours, roaming plans suffer briefly. I had the same thing when I first got roaming. Went Residential for that specific reason.
>>
>>107007839
Never happened and I have fibre internet since 2017.
Fibre cables are also underground here.
>>
>>107005235
>~20 ms
welcome to the world of satellite communications.

>>107005405
>well.. my numbers suggest nobody is really utilizing fiber so they should give a south african retard money to use an inferior network with 20ms+ ping rates
classic /g/



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.