I hate this utter piece of shit.
>>107005699looks like you need help
I have a crazy idea, why not ban tech illiterates like OP? Like what would we have to lose by not allowing them to post? They can lurk all they want and cry on twitter about their dogshit e-celeb controlled opinions all day long and at the same time 4chan gets its ad revenue.On a related note, has anyone started using jpegli for personal use yet? Like it's a pretty solid competitor to Webp IMHO.
>>107005699ecker autoconverts webp to a postable format so i no longer hate this format :)
you shouldn't be downloading the online images anyways,
>>107005699Don’t use it.It was a patent trolling idea from google to buy On2 release on2 “for free” and then, years later, “find” a new patent and shake-down companies for it.It’s a stupid plan that’s as old as the hills, and we saw through it immediately.You’d be better off using .gif as it’s off patent now.We used to use .gif in the olden days when computers were small and slow, encoding/decoding is trivial and good enough for, say, cell shaded things.
>>107005699The only thing wrong with webp is that 4chan doesn't support it.
>>107005699Why? Is there a reason you hate it?
>>107006136The normalfaggot hates what he cannot understand. When twitternigger markassbrownlee screams "webp bad!", the normalfaggot sings this in unison.
>>107005942>On a related note, has anyone started using jpegli for personal use yet? Like it's a pretty solid competitor to Webp IMHO.No transparency support like WebP though.
>>107006171Who gives a shit. Just oxipng that motherfucker.
>>107005699why? webp files are more compact than the usual image files.
get the "save as" browser extension
>>107005699better compression4chan should embrace webp
