Explain to me how copyright law and AI model training by scrapping the internet can coexist at the same time.
>remind me how multibillion dollar entities can do whatever they want
>>107009528applying copyright would be antisemitic
>>107009579do you realize they're scrapping the data from multibillion dollar industries?
>>107009528IANAL but I think one of the exceptions to copyright is when the derivative work is "substantially transformative."
>>107009616fair use doesnt cover commercial products.
>>107009528You need to take your meds first. That's the only way you could gasp that info, Cris.
>>107009621Fair use and substantially transformative are different things... but whatever the law actually says, >>107009579 is correct.
>>107009528>scrapping the internet
>>107009632your argument is that hollywood and the music industry from all countries will be ok with their data being scrapped without royalties.
>"most fast and break things" ~ Meta's mottois a coded message that means>when technology moves faster than the law can react, you get to break the lawThey know exactly what the fuck they're doing. Their so aware of it they make it their company's slogan.
>>107009528lurk the rest of 4chan
>>107009639They won't be happy with it, but AI companies are global darlings while the music industry is almost universally despised. At best, they'll get Napster 2.0, a temporary victory that only delays the inevitable. At worst, the tech industry uses their infinite money and brushes them aside. The record companies aren't going to rock the boat when there's no way they can come out on top.
>>107009703AI is a bubble that will crash next year.also normies hate AI.
>>107009639The hard part is proving a model was trained on IP you own.
>>107009711AI models can output nintendo and disney characters perfectly.
>>107009711like where it said to put glue in your cookies to cause and abortion or whatever that twidder post was?
>>107009709Normies hate when AI is shoved into their phones and computers, not AI in and of itself. See: Xitter and Grok.
>>107009729doesn't matter.It breaks the law.
>>107009528>I take a look at your book, then I move on to the next one.>I do this process billions of times, then I recreate a poem in the style of J.K. Rowling because I have seen them.>Somehow all these authors are assmad because I can achieve this, but automated
>>107009748It's illegal.And the issue is that you're fucking with literal billionaires income.
>>107009737Napster broke the law as well, but that didn't stop iTunes and Spotify from assraping the music industry.
>>107009654little thieves hang, big thieves wear crowns
>>107009759It's not the music industry, is a lot more industries.
>>107009756AI companies are based for doing these though. Digital rights are a joke because this entire conversation circles back to piracy again.
>>107009769do you realise the goverments sent military to catch torrent sites owners?
>>107009769man youre so close
>>107009528I hope this leads to copyright being abolished.
>>107009528Remember the golden rule.
>>107009721LOL, glue in pizza sauce to keep the cheese on.
they sold the copyright to your content which is actually theirs if you read the eula
>>107009824right, dont throw stones if you can't get out of the kitchen
all those hours you mightve spent on twitter/reddit(for free) is now being sold back to you via chatgpt
>>107009867and we are using it to make fun of them
