Wikipedia's editors have had enough of AI and is now proposing to ban it or at least restrict it to "experienced" editors. It's had a flood of new editors just copying and pasting AI output into Wikipedia's textboxes and now the community wants Wikipedia to be "human only". They are already using the slogan "knowledge is human" in their donation banners, suggesting that Wiki editors are fully against AI.Vandalism used to be the worst problem Wikipedia faced, but in the old days they required human creativity to vandalize, now bots can just mass disrupt. With Groks new AI generated rival due to launch soon Wikipedia is officially declaring to be the face of "human intelligence".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_articles_with_large_language_models and its talk page.
>>107011843That's the business model of ChatGPT. Replacing volunteers.
>>107011843don't care, wikipedia has been unusable slop full of leftist lies ever since the neo-marxists took it over
is there one single part of the internet that isn't getting completely enshittified by ai?
>>107012103Everything behind logins.
ai ouroboros. ai-written articles full of misinformation will be the basis for said ai.
>>107011843>read articles about mystery bankers>"X was born with a gift for making money"
