Why did AI lose?
>You know how the entire economy is a bunch of B2B teetering on the tiny chunk of companies still making stuff for consumers? Well we're going to add more garbage to the B2B part.
>>107017232Investors are too desperate for more hypergrowth markets.
>>107017232My current job contract ends 1 jan, so please pop the bubble next year
>>107017487what we really need is a large and sustained contraction in the money supply
After AI can we kill all the data and analytics bullshit?>Hey our product sucks dick>We should make a product that doesn't suck dick inste—>Nah fuck that, let's create an entire economy and industry around only fucking the exact point where our product sucks dick the most, then barely adjust that in order to offset the cost of everyone we just hired in analytics. They are really cheap and they want to do the hiring too.
>>107017232Will they sell the hardware used?
>>107017637Unfortunately I think that shit is here to stay. There are entire degree programs and fields of research for this shit now.
>>107017232AI is only good in certain situations, not to the extremes and diversities of that the companies are going to to get people to adopt this stuff.Also, I think some anons pointed out that the AI development industry is one massive circlejerk between all the competitors and GPU makers. I would not know how bad of a sign that is, if true.
>>107017696It means most of the money these companies claim to be making and receiving in investments is fake. Eventually investors will realize that, and correct their valuations of these companies, which will send stock prices tumbling and likely lead to investors becoming less interested in AI.
>>107017696Basically over half of it's spending/revenue at this point is some large valued company (usually Nvidia), giving money to AI companies so they can then turn around and buy shit from the company giving them money.In the end nothing was produced outside of a toy for thirdies, and yet GDP and share prices go up.
>global economiesThanksfully the retard is forcing a decoupling with cope tariffs and sanctions.
>>107017232>two more weeks and ai will disappear!>t. artranny/codetroon
>>107017232keep coping, meatbag
> ^ talmudic posting like thatNot going so well I guess
>>107017232AI bubble is Chinese propaganda to destabilise the US AI economy while theirs has full government backing
>>107017637Financialization of the economy is why I don't judge cultures like Easter Island too harshly for getting into weird manias that were detrimental to their overall health.
>>107017232Because it's going to quickly saturate as every B2B scrambles to implement some sort of "AI" into their products. The only purpose of this in most cases is to chase the AI trend and entice investors. Investors are some of the dumbest fucking people to ever exist btw, apart from a few outliers that do their due diligence (maybe 5% of them).
>>107017232Being able to generate pictures, videos and written smut without commisioning a meatbag is a unprecedented use case
>>107017665As a shareholder I feel entitled to an RTX PRO 6000 when they become worthless.But knowing Nvidia they will probably have them all shredded to avoid spoiling the gaming card market.
>>107017232When most of the GDP growth this year is just circlejerking between AI and AI-adjacent companies, you just know it's not going to end well.
>>107017622very antisemitic post
>>107017232These investor trends always shift and only last 3 or 4 years.2010-2014: Smartphone apps2014-2017: SaaS, FinTech, APIs2016-2019: VR, the Metaverse2017-2021: CleanTech, carbon offsets, "sustainability"2018-2022: Web 3.0., Crypto, Blockchain, NFTs2022-2025: AI (more like LLMs)Pretty much any company only now attempting to implement AI in their SaaS company is running way behind the real money, which clearly got given to OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI and Google.Tech investors are complete sheep, and so are the founders. It's an incredibly normie-fied industry, even though entrepreneurs are supposed to be disagreeable free thinkers that can't work in a corporate job, but they're actually just normal people with rich parents.We're basically ready for the next trend cycle, which will either be AGI or something left-field.
>>107017232It was all the big players shuffling the same billions of dollars around to one another.
>>107018122>Tech investors are complete sheepProbably the truest statement posted on /g/ all year.>AGII really hope not.
>>107017857those guys had the population crash because conquistadors sent them to silver mines, the moai heads wheren't a problem for them. Weird self destructive manias are more of a late chinese dynasty thing.>>107017696Those bigfoot ai videos are really the best thing we got from this tech, a cheepining to animation and the death of needless busy work papers/positions are the only legacy this line of tech will produce.
>>107017232>US and globalJust say global.
>>107017637>lets make dashboards! for management!>what data points should we show?>cricketsMeanwhile, people can't run basic bitch BI reporting to do their jobs (like take inventory) because of all the NoSQL shit and siloling the warehouse data from the inventory data from the product catalog.The 2010s fucked everything so badly it's insane.
>>107018057Jensen needs to be put down
>>107017232the dot com bubble popped and the internet didn't "lose", investors did
>>107018122agreed except green energy is a real megatrend that will only grow in importancemaybe not in America but who cares
>>107017232Money doesn't just vanish into thin air, it has to go somewhere.The powers will not let AI crash until there's a next big thing to dump all that money into. Although the precious metals market is indicating that people are cashing out somewhat.
>>107017232>Why did AI lose?*will. It's nowhere near losing yet.
>>107019089>Money doesn't just vanish into thin air, it has to go somewhereit's not vanishing, it's JUST wandering aimlessly around in circles, making all these producers of hot air and bullshit look actually valuable.
The tech bubble itself hasn't even collapsed. The tech bubble will not collapse until Snapchat collapses. They are the shining example of the bubble. They still don't make any money, they haven't had a profitable year, they just exist because of speculation. Google was unprofitable from 1998-2003 so investors think fundamentals never matter for anything ever and 15 years is a normal time to continue waiting for profitability.
>>107019089Money vanishes when they realize there's no more suckers paying trilions for shares that have been handed off and passed around like a freshman slut
>>107017843This is correct
>>107017696Just realize that NVDA was so afraid of the crypto bubble bursting that they invented a completely new bubble, just to make it so gamers can't afford GPUs.
>>107019145watch the antisemitism bud
>>107017843AI economyAhh yes the cow dung eating economy.
>Bitcoin was a nothing burger >Web3.0 was a nothing burger>Metaverse was a nothing burgerWhy does Silicon Valley keep burning billions each year with scams and pump and dump schemes? Who does this benefit?
>>107017696>NVidia gives open AI a billion dollars>OpenAI turns around and buys a billion dollars worth of GPUs from NVidia >NVidia provided a billion dollars worth of goods for free, effectively How aren't they losing money? And if you pay attention to the headlines NVidia is giving those companies more money than they're then expending into GPUsI feel like they're pumping the bubble to keep GPU prices from crashing after crypto failed to deliver
>>107021168To be fair they sell GPUs at such a mark-up that if you told me a billion dollars worth of GPUs costed less than ten million to produce I would believe you
>>107018122these were all the same companies too so their stocks kept getting more inflated and none of the previous bubbles popped, we just forgot and moved on
>>107021152>Who does this benefit?You know (((who)))
>>107021152the US likes to print and borrow a lot (from themselves) which has caused runaway asset inflation, which is even more insidious than regular inflation in many ways. one of the effects is that now asset owners have to compete to beat S&P500 to stay rich, instead of just the "regular" nominal 2% inflation which is a fairy tale number at this point. anyway, when the S&P500 randomly grows 30% in a year despite all the growing companies just paying each other with IOUs and doing stock buybacks and shit, and the economy having become irrefutably fake and gay, you have to make increasingly crazy bets to try to beat that or you become poorer. even the regular consuming is made retarded by these antics. whenever you buy something like a car or a vacuum cleaner or whatever, and you don't instead put that money into some asset that just naturally appreciates for no real reason like gold, then you are losing a fuckton of money whenever you actually buy anything. all anyone is incentivized to do is be born early enough to put money into assets and sit their fat asses on them, which isnt a good foundation for an economy
>>107018057The ones that have been actually sold to third parties will probably be resold thoughThere's a chance AliExpress will be flooded with frankenstein gaming cards built with AI GPUs in the not so distant future
>>107017232AI is winning. Has been winning since its inception in the 50'. And will continue to win regardless of the economy state, or of the success of ML & LLMs.LLM are good enough at what they were supposed to do. The attempts made at using it as an universal answer to all AI-related problem are laughable, though.Hence, your question is retarded, and you should kill yourself, OP.
>>107017718if you're ahead of investors you should be rich then
>>107017637big data is just the new consultants, weaponized mediocrity AI is just a minimum common denominator generator, so if you are below the average it's god
>>107019174snapchat has been profitable in past quarters, its cash flow neutral now pretty much
>>107017232AI won. The world government has their AI surveillance datacenters and infrastructure now.
>>107017622up first: social services
