320 Mp3 or FLAC? Which one is better? Are they the same thing?
>>107025811why troll? FLAC is lossless, MP3 isn't. lol
>>107025811It depends if you use bluetooth. FLAC is mandatory for bluetooth.
>>107025811mp3 vbr, take it or leave it
>>107025811mp3 = jpegFLAC = pngbutmp3 smallerpng larger
>>107025831Is your ear really that good to notice any difference between them?
>>107025831post your audiophile setup, I'll wait
>>107025854No clue, been a long time since I listened to MP3s.>>107025877i have dt 770 pros that are falling apart, I'm not an audiophile.
>>107025811wav > flac > aac > ogg > anything else > mp3>>107025839>FLAC is mandatory for bluetooth.Really? That seems stupid because bluetooth devices always compress the sound in order to have a lot less data to transmit.
>>107026233Right so if you start with lossy slop (ie MP3), and then further rape the audio with lossy it doesn't matter if the source is 320k MP3, the final audio output will sound like 64 kbps MP3.
>>107025811Can't tell the difference but might as well use flac since the increased filesize is completely meaningless now
192 kbps mp3 is the sweet spot
>>107025811for instrumental or similar vibe, flac is better. for metal or similar vibe mp3 is better.
64kbps audio downloaded from Youtube.
>>107025811OPUSWAV / FLAC compressed to 192kbps OPUS
>>107025811>Are they the same thing?Only DEVELOPERS really know desu, OP. Let's ask them.
>>107025877Post your pedophile setup
>>107025811i get flacs and use ffmpeg to convert them to 320k aaci hear no difference before and after conversion also i would not go through all of this tinkering and just use flac if not for my huge ass library that i cant fit on my phone
>>107025811>Which one is better?For what? They're meant for different use cases
