What do you think about Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation?... again
>>107039240It's a bit biased.
back in my day, after the the pledge of allegiance, we had the pledge of credible sources
>>107039240The single most based website on the entire Internet.>any anon can edit>facts over feelings>judge a man not by his username but by the content of his cited sourcesNo wonder it makes retards like Elon seethe lmao. Brainlets who can't source BTFO
>>107039240i like it, it's a place where autistic people are free to sperg out. i respect they never did some gay massive redux of the site's design in an era of minimalism
>>107039250>>107039289human posts>>107039307>>107039559bot posts
>>107039240Wikimedia Foundation is a money printing press, they're the giga-panhandlers of the webEnglish Wikipedia is a biased swamp of misinformation that reifies existing entrenched power structuresi've found literal advertisements in articles before, and harmful medical misinformation in othersi've only read a bit of Spanish and French Wikipedia, not enough to judge their quality, and i don't read any other languages well enough to judge the othersLLM-generated encyclopedias are the future, not Grokipedia, but something like it
>>107039240Kikepedia
>>107039953LLMs are currently more retarded and censored than even Wikipedia Fix LLMs by having one that isn’t in the hands of the kikes first
>>107039962i said>LLM-generated encyclopedias are the futureyou replied >LLMs are currentlyi'm guessing you're not a native English speaker, so go to an English dictionary and look up the definitions of "currently" and "future"thanks
>>107039240haha OP I love froggo XD
>>107039240Jimmy wants my tree fiddy real bad, he's been asking for years.
schizo spam
