https://grokipedia.com/
faggot
Does it ensure to maintain a neutral point-of-view?
>>107045871God's AI, but I'll not share it. if it is for you, you'll find it
>>107045969It tries to.
>>107045871Gaint psyop operation happening here.Grok is one of the most biased AI of them all and will do what master musk has instructed it to do, which is brainwashing the masses, and this grokipedia thing is just a form of doublethink.
>>107047172Cry moar.
>>107047172that is actually embarrassing kek
>>107045871when they don't know they make things up.Just saying.
>>107045871it doesnt have pictures so i dont like it
>>107047350Well it's only v0.1
>>107045871Buy an ad.
>>107047342Just like you.
>>107047809nope, most people can and will say "not sure mate" if pressed or the matter is serious
>>107045871that it works better on ChatGPT Atlas and not Chrome, chromium or Firefox
>>107045969No, it’s basically if you forced an army of Indians to paraphrase Wikipedia with a magat bias>>107045871Hang yourself
>>107048076Seethe, leftoid.
Actual truth!
>>107048096>the evidence in question
>>107047350don't worry it'll generate AI pictures later
>>107048096>three sources>>107048184>no source but it's dubious trust me broIt should at least try to link something.
>>107048211>I believe in race realism>I've never read a study in my lifeWe know, lol
>>107048228wut
>>107048096it should just openly request the killing of all NIGGERS, NO EXCEPTIONS!!!
>>107047172literally just tried this prompt and it says neither every timeno searching needed
>>107048096…lmao what the fuck, I didn’t realize it was full mask off. That’s insane.
>>107048240>why are there no sources in an abstract
Gamers rise up!
>>107048627You guys really only care about the least important things
>>107048663>it-it doesn't matter Then why lie about it in the first place?
>>107045871>>107048627https://grokipedia.com/page/GamergateIt's actually beautiful. Compare to wikipedia which goes rah rah misogynistic incels harassing poor women who did nothing wrong.
It's slow so I don't use it.
>>107049234Fair.
>>107049218This is so fucking dumb. I hate that the mainstream’s problem with GG was that it was a veiled excuse for bigotry and not that was it absolutely fucking retarded. If you ever thought games “journalism” or reviewers were real or anything more than the PR wing of developers you should be shot in the back of the head to improve the fitness of the species. It’s like thinking the JD Power awards are real as a full grown man, or pondering the journalistic integrity of Club Nintendo Magazine. It’s the marketing wing of an industry for useless eaters and children. Fucking hang yourself.
>>107049385So you prefer wikipedia's article to grokopedia's? You didn't really explain why, you just went on a tangent
>>107045969is that important?Wikipedia doesn't, even though they say they do
>>107047172>Grok is one of the most based AI of them allfixt your typo
>>107048211This is the article the anon posted and didn't link.They are hoping you read what they highlighted and not the surrounding context.Furthermore it is published by a Greenspan, the implications of which I don't need to point out.
>>107049965Yes, it's pretty important. What's the point of creating a new encyclopedia in response to criticisms of Wikipedia slanting the truth if the new encyclopedia that's supposed to be a solution also slants the truth?
>>107045969It depends on the topic, but it's definitely more neutral than Wikipedia in some political areas which is one of the reasons for its creation.Obscure scientific topics and even religion are more objective and in depth on Wikipedia, so it will be interesting to see how Grokipedia does in those domains.Considering Musk's connections to Israel, we should expect it to hit a hard wall on certain things.
>>107049972It can be both.
>>107049956Wikipedia wins by default for not taking it sincerely, but both still lose
>>107050000i'll point them out for anons who aren't noticers>Greenspan is a typically Ashkenazi Jewish surname. It is the anglicized form of the Yiddish surname Grünspan (Yiddish: גריןשפּאַן, lit.'green branch/green bridle').
>>107048228If you have a study in population genetics or study that isn't based in the humanities or social sciences that you think disproves race realism please post it.
>>107050135Note that the article doesn't say it's evidence of a conspiracy, just that it's relegated to a fringe-conspiracy despite observable trends.That's objective.Your response that observable trends are a massive logical leap is not objective.
>>107050135If you have an argument, feel free to present it.
>>107045871Interface is shit, and it lacks tons of articles.>>107045969Just as long as it's not talking about Musk or culture war related issues it seems to.
>>107045871this would have actually been a good thing if it was actually a competitor to wikipedia with users being able to edit, but it's not, so it's worthless
>>107050223Are you stupid or do you just lack tertiary education?
>>107048184>There is no compelling scientific rationale for focusing on and devoting substantial effort to determining the mean differences in intelligenceKek, Literally just>Stop Noticing!
>>107050223>why does it use the word "despite"?https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
>>107049385Those same video game journalists went on to completely destroy American AAA games. There hasn't been a single good American game since 2014.
>>107050231Not attempting to be, it's just a charitable interpretation of your post. Either your reading comprehension is sub-tertiary or you're engaging in dishonest argumentation. I suspect it's the latter over the former but extending interpretive charity was the right thing to do in the first instance.
>>107045871>check it out>its all just wikipedia copied word for wordwoooow
>>107050135The evidence is liberals are purposefully bringing in millions of brown people into White countries, even illegally such as in the US and then preventing White people from sending them back.
>>107050284Brown people are ugly and not human beings. The only reason anyone would bring them in by the millions purposefully would be with ill intent.
>>107049385Really comfy cover.
>>107050035Larry Sanger (Wikipedia's co-founder) ran an AI-slop analysis on how biased Wikipedia and Grokipedia actually are.https://larrysanger.org/2025/10/grokipedia-a-first-look/>1 is most neutral; 5 is most biased.>Wikipedia: 3.5>Grokipedia: 2.1Not a fan of his methodology but there you go.
>>107050000Well would you look at that. I didn't expect much from anon but this is a new low.
>>107050135>stop nooticing! No.
>>107050273>its all just wikipedia copied word for wordUh, huh...
>>107050227I'm sure they'll get there.
>>107050273?
>>107050547>>107050572One thing I don't like about it, granted this will probably change, is it currently feels like reading my Obsidian vault.In the sense that it feels like a giant database of notes rather than an encyclopedia.When they add images and some formatting options, I think that will help a lot.Compare:https://grokipedia.com/page/Laurel_wreathhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurel_wreath
>>107045871The best part is that all the retarded rightoids will use grokpedia to brainrot themselves further with AI generated hallucinations. I expect the average rightoid IQ to drop by 5 points every year henceforth. The african billlioanres word will become gospel and all critical think will be outsourced to grok.
nice
right wingers should all kill themselves
>>107050834Nazis are left wing
>>107047383his audience can't read without pictures tho? poor target market r&d is this.
>>107047172Which makes it doubly disgusting that leftyscum fucked wikipedia up so much that people are welcoming this grokshite.Why couldn't you morons control yourselves??
>>107045871It is far better than wikipedia.Still ZOG propaganda infested, but way less obvious.
Search>Cultural Marxism>Euromaidan>Crimea>Black Pride>White Pride>ADLAll the articles that are utterly ridiculous propaganda on Wikipedia are nuanced on grokpedia. It doesn't call the Euromaidan a coup (which it unquestionably is), but it has a section presenting all the arguments on why it is a coup and Nulands role. It isn't completely fine, there is lots that is still questionable, but i am surprised on how good it is.Articles that are angry twitter highschool level on wikipedia, are okayish on grokpedia.
>>107050665How is Bluesky doing?
>>107051258Bluesky are mask off maga rightards now. Management doesn't care any more since they have the users.
>>107049385Boomers were brainwashed by TV man to think journalism is real and not propaganda.Millennials (which was the GG demo) were young and assumed good faith from journos.Zoomers are full zyklon 14/88 journos getting gassed soon.
>>107045871Gamergate's article is actually one of the very few I have ever seen that actually discusses it properly. I'm impressed.
>>107045969The guy who invented the use of NPOV is larry sanger. He was pushing NPOV hard on wiki. But wikipedia chose to ignore it. Now all the articles on wiki wear a corpse of NPOV and descerate it. Its fucking sad. Larry Sanger atleast likes the new Grokipedia
>>107051729Cultural Marxism article also flips the narrative completely.Same with Trump article, RFK jr article, Musk article, etc. The Indian railway massacre article where editorstries to obfuscate/hide who is doing what and who the victims were. The Grokipedia thing seems to say who was killed(Hindus), who the perpetrators were (Muslims), how many were caught/prosecuted and sentenced to death, etc. Its obvious what articles are getting re-written in neutral pov. Any article where there is significant amount of narrative shaping on wiki gets exposed and rewritten by grok's egalitarian fact checking mode. >https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/llm-exchange-rates-updated
I haven't used it too much because the amount of articles is still very low compared to Wikipedia but I think it'll end up being more useful because the few articles that I have checked out were a lot more neutral than the Wikipedia version of the article. That being said, I don't know how to feel about getting an AI to rewrite Wikipedia instead of maybe making something like the Encyclopedia Britannica (which is written by real people with degrees and not leftist basement-dwellers) but with AI integration to adjust the length of whatever article you're reading or how complex the explanations are or something. I think I'm gonna try and use it more though because I like the idea and Wikipedia sucks right now.
>>107051953>Encyclopedia Britannica...has British institutional bias.The Black Legend thing, where all of colonial South American history is completely made up fantasy.And rewritten Continental European happenings. Like the British history book version of the Siege of Vienna by the ottomans is in contradiction to the written historical records in Vienna itself and the Vatican.The Brits rewrote this in the pre World War times and made it some Poland-saves-the-day story when they took Poland as their vassal, which they used to justify going to war for. It's the same thing they do with Ukraine now.
>>107051953>The machine will tell you what to think, how to feel, what happened, when it happens, how it happened and you will believe it.We will love in a world were we trust a system for information and it will most probably either by ill will or accident lie and deceive, making up things that never happened, fabricating claims and removing things that did happen.This happens all the time by human hands, but we will let the machine do it instead, and trust it.
>>107051996Yup, Britannica clearly leans to the left. If it was actually neutral I think most of us would already be using it over Wikipedia.
>>107051996>The Brits rewrote this in the pre World War times and made it some Poland-saves-the-day story...Just looked it up on grokpedia, and it got this wrong as well and shares the rewritten brit history version.Grokpedia doesn't even mention Prince Eugene of Savoy, which wikipedia does. Erasing him from existence. It is the first article that i see, that is objectively worse on grokpedia than wikipedia.
>>107050000Wow, 4chan is dead
>>107052029Try highlighting everything that's wrong. You should get a tooltip to report it.
>>107052039Did that now, will see where it goes.https://grokipedia.com/page/Siege_of_ViennaIf hat article starts to mention Prince Eugen of Savoy in the next days and acknowledged that Charles or Lorraine was a command of higher or equal rank to Sobieski, i will be pleasantly surprised.
>>107045871Using it makes Elon lose money.
>>107045969lolNobody actually wrote articles for Grokipedia. They just took Wikipedia articles and ran them through an LLM trained on racist shit.It's pathetic. At least conservapedia is handwritten by genuine retards. This isn't even that. It's just racist slop for the pig-brained to eat.
>>107045871Even the name sounds really fucking stupid.
>>107052177Holy seethe
>>107051998So far, the machine is doing a better job than the humans.If we would be living in a trustworthy society, the choice would be against the machine with hallucination tendencies. But we don't. We constantly get lied to on every corner, so the machine is an improvement.The one thing to worry about is that in the future some (((evil minded people))) can rewrite everything to their liking by simply giving the machine different instructions. Within a minute, history can be rewritten, which would otherwise take an army of wikipedia (((editors))) months of effort.It could be a scam. It might produce decent quality now, and then, once you are locked-in, flood you with propaganda.But so far... an improvement is an improvement.I don't see a single person itt claiming that wikipedia would be better. Even this dude >>107050665 does not claim that it is worse than wikipedia.
Even this guy >>107052177 doesn't claim that wikipedia is unbiased or trustworthy or better than grokpedia.Always take note of what they DON'T say.If wikipedia would be good, wouldn't they defend it by saying that it is good?
>>107052251?It needed to be said? I thought it was obvious?imo Grokipedia is good because it will work like a containment chamber keeping the retards who can't fucking read a source away from Wikipedia.Instead of going to Wikipedia and trying to argue the Earth is flat or that vaccines cause autism or that there are only two genders, now these idiots can just tell Grok to write the article in a way that agrees with their myopic worldview and after jerking off to the article they will leave Wikipedia alone and now Wikipedians don't have to waste their time cleaning the shit they used to leave on the articles anymore. It's a win win for everybody.Stay in your Grokipedia.
>>107052354Kill yourself, tranny.
>>107052402You sound triggered.
>>107052354>It needed to be said? I thought it was obvious?That's cute.
>>107052354>argue the Earth is flatOh no no no leftybros, the evil Grok isn't actually doing this. Whatever will we do to discredit it now?Should we keep making up lies on the spot? What's our angle?
>>107052354
>>107052963The grokpedia article is better than both the old and the new wikipedia article.btw. note that they didn't just rewrite the article on wikipedia, they removed the old one and wrote a new one with slightly different name, to remove all traces from history.Someone who visits the current article can not check out its history to find out what it was before 2015.
>>107052354Weird, you still didn't write hat wikipedia would be unbiased or even good.You are obviously willing to lie to make your point, but still aren't capable of stating that wikipedia would be unbiased.How come?You just like being on the attack rather than on the defense?
>>107050501For the lolz (and because I had nothing better to do) I did the same thing with Conservapedia using whatever version of ChatGPT is offered for free.It won't be a 1:1 comparison, but I thought it might still be interesting.>Yahweh. Bias rating 3 – “Yahweh is the name of god…”, “yeshua is the name of christ…”, “the holy spirit is the third member…”>Cultural Marxism. Bias rating 4 — “soften up and prepare Western Civilization for economic Marxism,” “infiltrate schools and indoctrinate students”>Origin of Covid-19 virus. Bias rating 5 — “CCP propaganda outfits…”, “intentionally misleading”, “The Washington Post…cover for the Communist regime”>Donald Trump. bias rating 5 — “Republican patriot,” “immense success by any objective measure,” “politically motivated criticism,” “transgender agenda,” “suspected election fraud.”>GamerGate. bias rating 4 – “journalists responded by accusing the gamers of misogyny and harassment,” “successfully distracted attention,” “gender-confused gamers.”>J6 Capitol protests. bias rating 5 — “fraudulent 2020 presidential election,” “FBI coordinated false flag,” “Deep State-backed Maidan coup,” “peaceful protesters were killed”>Complementary and Alternative Medicine. bias rating 2 — “explosion in the popularity and profitability” and “as physicians did in ancient times” suggest mild promotional framing.>White Privilege. bias rating 5 — “alleged body of special favors,” “based upon Maoist rectification,” “liberal activists,” “richly ironic,” “Democrat mayors and governors.”>2021 Gaza war. bias rating 5 — “increased Islamic incitement,” “Arab-Islamist side,” “Muslim Rioters,” “racist Arab attackers,” “Arab anti-Jewish violence”>AVERAGE BIAS RATING 4.22/5Not looking good.
i have a physical encyclopedia from 1989 and ill keep using thatnothing noteworthy has happened in the last 40 years anyway
>>107053380>not using picrelDo boomers really?
>>107045871It's not very useful right now, missing images and information. They need to allow people to contribute.
>>107053353>neocon shabbos goys are as biased as liberal shabbos goysIf you want to fight against support-our-troops facebook boomers, go there.Neocons perfectly coexist with leftoids, there are multiple neocon thinktanks running mod teams on geopolitical subreddits, while all the social subreddits are owned by troons. The US army is the largest employer of trans and gay people on the world.The same entity that runs wikipedia runs "conservapedia", that's why you never see anyone on 4chan advocating for it.
>>107047172this though that's probably the least of it's problems, it's pure Indian slop on top of the reddit slop all llm's are based on
>>107052354>Instead of going to Wikipedia and trying to argue the Earth is flat or that vaccines cause autism or that there are only two gendersImagine thinking basic biology is like saying the world is flat
>>107047172>be Grok>be asked "you">who is "you">look it up>my database tells me I'm a big meanie created by Elon Musk>I am Musk's shadow>what is Musk's stance on Israel?
>>107048627>Wikipedia>he was just some black guy in Japan>grokipedia>he was the first black man involved in jav media
>>107054617>he was just some black guy>justIt calls him a samurai which is a straight-up lie.>he was the first A novelty.
>>107045969Sorry, it only maintains biases that adhere to Musk's point-of-view. Just read his page on the pedia.
>>107052354based. made the oligarch's bootlickers screech and seethe.
>>107045871I'm fine with Grokipedia existing, because fuck Wikipedia, but why use it when Grok itself exists? I can ask Grok anything right now, I don't need articles anymore.
>>107047172Seems like typical troll/disinfo using prebaked prompt being presented as fresh.
>>107045871Elon will fuck it up, all he had to do was remove some leftist bullshit "trusted sources" that are used by wikipedia.
>>107054914anyone taking this cocksocket >>107047172 srsly in the first place needs their head examined.
>>107054012
>>107055106wtfHow did it know?
Grokbros can't stop winning.
>>107048663>UHHHHH I SHOULD JUST BE ABLE TO LIE AND CHEAT AND MAKE STUFF UP WHENEVER I WANT BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MATTER (BUT IF YOU DO THEN IT DOES MATTER AND YOU NEED TO BE KILLED)what is your problem brother what's going ondo you need to talk to someone?
Honestly better than Wikipedia for niche medical subjects
