do you agree with here /g/ ?
>>107047369Technically it is Computational linguistics, which is a math.
>>107047378She's got that slightly uggo face stuck somewhere between cute and hot.
>>107047369performative oscilloscope owner
>>107047378ok, loudmouthformal verification system for c when>b-but you odnt need thatkeklmao
>>107047369Certainly made it easier for me.
>>107047417Frama-C exists
dumb midwit bitch, all of her videos are shallow tech adjacent coombait
>>107047548>Frama-C>Frama-C is a set of interoperable program analyzers for C programs. thats valgrind, but multikulti
>>107047599Valgrind is not a static analyzer
Shouldn't women be better programmers than men if this holds up?
>>107047369Without having watched her video and heard her argument, I would tend to disagree. Functional and logic programming seem much closer to doing math, to the point where programming in some languages, e.g. Coq, Lean, etc is *literally* doing math. Imperative and object-oriented programming in say, python or C feels quite different, but some of the same of reasoning is still there. Regardless, there are aspects of programming that bare a strong relation mathematics, but I wouldn't say therefore that programming *is* math.I haven't studied linguistics in any detail but from bits I've picked up here and there I can't say it bore much similarity to programming at all.
>>107047455To be fair, did anyone really believe that one of the better low-level programmer youtubers was actually a woman?
>>107047725It's possible that women are on average more naturally gifted than men at programming without the external effects of the existing masculine culture of the industry, or the disruption to women's professional development due to having children.
>>107047378>he doesn't wants to be called a manthat pic doesn't help also buy an AD
>>107047369Math is a languageCheckmate
