https://x.com/techhalla/status/1983079291937022015
Call me when they can produce more than 10 seconds. So, 2 or 3 years from now, I guess.
>>107048446Both guys are mouthing the same line simultaneously in this shot.
>>107048446That live Family Guy AI channel on YT was somewhat entertaining for a couple minutes at a time a year or so ago. It's user submitted scenarios run through something so it's not fully AI.
There are second-hand guitars... and then there are third-hand guitars.
>>107048507If you mean this, this clearly isn't AI video. The AI only writes/says the voice lines. It's far less impressive than AI podcasts.
The man outside opens the door... from the inside.
>>107048446Could you uhg post the video instead of twitter's anus as a source?
I would've probably sued the surgeon who transplanted her left arm backwards onto her right shoulder if I were her.
>>107048555It's called comedy, you wouldn't get it.
>>107048446Imaging complaining that this isn't perfect. All it takes is time. In 3 months it will be even better. Then in 3 months it will be even better. Then in 3 months it will be even better. Then in 3 months you'll be bitching about something else.
>>107048612NO! IT WILL NEVER GET BETTER!!!
>>107048487>>107048520>>107048555>>107048590You point out all these minor inconsistencies but ignore the woman with the green top and flower skirt spontaneously cloning herself?
>>107048612Cope
>walks in between you and the table and steals your water>"nothing personnel kid"
reminder that your electricity bills are trippling while you are giggling at shitty ai slop and they real ai development is about total surveillance and control, meanwhile ai bubble popping will crash whole economy worse than dotcom or 2008 banking flop
>>107048612>>107048624
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKlpylzZ7Ak
>>107048446>0:42>blondie doing magic trick>throws ball up>drops ball on the floor>magically turns into two hot blondes.The ball was a distraction. The AI knows magic tricks. I thought the twins were going to make out, so imagine this tech for porn a couple more years down the line.
The problem with AI video gen is the lack of control you have. You can type in what you want to see, but once you hit generate, it's out of your hands and in the RNG's. Ultimately the shot will most likely never be what you had in your head, many times it will miss the mark by far and you'll have to continue clicking generate until you find something good enough to satisfy you.
>>107048446Sitcoms already weren't funny but this is extra bad. Smelly cat had potential but it ruined the punchline.
Quality assurance and testing jobs should go up a lot because someone can to reject all this excessive defective production. Someone has to curate it.
>>107048446If you fall for this you are really lacking in braincells
>>107048612But how much better will it be in two weeks?
>>107048787
>>107048882>many times it will miss the mark by far and you'll have to continue clicking generate until you find something good enough to satisfy you.You hit the nail on the head. Someone has to curate this because AI will never not get it until sentient robots. This is gonna be the media job of the future.
>>107048882AI video gen also takes incredible resources to keep context going for consistency of the scene. Which is why all of these AI videos are always extremely short clips and as the scene plays out longer you see more and more defects. Then they cut to a new scene to distract you from it
>>107048897>Quality assuranceOutdated concept. AI can autovalidate itself
>>107048960No it can't and it also lies all the time.
I get the sense that tech tards don't understand entertainment.
>>107048925
>>107048446>Acquaintances
>>107048446call me when they can generate a 60 foot tall jennifer aniston stepping on me. no really, call me when that happens
>>107048612>Imaging complaining that this isn't perfect.you hate it when people notice deficiencies in things?>the rest of your post...do you truly want it to get better or not?
>>107048520>>107048555>>107048590Can someone explain to me why the AI industry is the only one in the world that launches unfinished and obviously bad products and is proud of it? And why all of a sudden consumers ignore quality and buy these products anyway?
>>107049448Did you just notice something without my permission?
>>107048446This is so laughably retarded i lol'd. The woman in green shitting out a version of herself was peak.
>>107048612it's quite literally incoherent garbage.There's over 200 episodes of friends and that's the best the model can shit out?
>>107049883its better than every episode of friends combinedcaptcha: ppp4p
>>107049898it's somehow sub-slop level, pajeet
>>107049448Personal computers in the 90s were slow and crashed all the time.I don't remember people referring to them as "unfinished", though.It was more like "Holy shit, it's 3D now! And I can talk to people from Japan! WHOOOAA".
>>107049448>AI industry is the only oneAh yes, because automobiles plateaued with the Model T Ford.
>>107048446My favorite one is the woman throwing ball spawns another copy with rapid mitosis.I find how schizo these slop are ironically enjoyable.>>107049448At least AI have some uses in the sea of BS.Crypto on the other hand...
>>107048446>sitcoms will never be the samelmao. this twitter loser is extra embarrassing. he really believes he's this kind of AI master because he can type in things into commercial services and slop falls out:>I have generated thousands of prompts to create art through AI, using tools like MidJourney, Stable Diffusion, Remix, Firefly, or Dall·E 3, and I want to share my knowledge and experience with all of you.the absolute state of this twitter loser
>>107048882It works great when surrealism is what you're actually going for but, at least for now, you're right that it's difficult to get it to stop making really bad continuity errors.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOcZPQxb-g8
>>107049960>Personal computers in the 90s were slowmine wasn't.>and crashed all the time.programs crashing? all the time. nothing has changed in 2025. crashing the entire computer? rare back then, even rarer today.>>107049448because they need to justify their existence and demonstrate some progress so that investors keep pumping up dud ai businesses with cash. people behind these garbage businesses aren't making any real progress as most of humanity has united to shit on it and shit on those that use this trash.
>>107048984LLMs are getting increasingly good at obfuscating what's basically "return true" in unit tests. MBAbros love that shit.
>>107048960lmao>t. AI QA
>>107050074the underlying model that makes up the LLM hasn't changed, but the filtering of user inputs has changed. people have tried uising LLM for various things and it sucks at everything except being a digital parrot and search engine slave. LLM in current year is a dead end.
>>107049960It took 45 years to go from the Wright Brothers first powered flight to the first jet aircraft. It's now been 75 years since the first jet airplane and you think improvements happen linearly?
>>107048446Call me a slop enjoyer but I already laughed at Kirkinator videos.
>>107050104Yes. It's just funny to me that people have LLMs write unit tests against the LLM's own code and the managers demanding it don't see why that's a problem.
>>107048960>AI can autovalidate itself
>>107048446the audience will be replaced by AI long before it produces anything funnyhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OHQRo3Uz_VQ
>>107050074MBA bros are impressed
>>107048446Can AI retain location consistency between multiple shots or will every shot in a scene be in a different location?
>>107050129they don't see it being a problem as they're so heavily invested in the tech, whether it be financially, emotionally or just purely obsessed mental cases, they are blind to such obvious problems that would make any normal person just cringe and walk out of the room. even more alarming is how a lot of people don't have their own computers with models, they're relying on another corporation, who's opinions about whatever topic can change over time, filtering results and destroying any expectation of a predictable output. how do you unit test against a corporation who move goal posts depending on politics of the day? just a joke.>>107050150i have no doubt some extreme cringe merchant tv studio would adopt ai just for that purpose
>>107050039Crypto is good for tax evasion.
Them having 3 arms is part of the humour, idiots.
>>107050279Total Recall had a three breasted woman that audiences loved so I agree, three armed women will be a hit.
>>107048520>third-hand>>107048590>transplanted her left arm backwards>>107048628>woman with the green top and flower skirt spontaneously cloning herself?>>107049883>incoherent garbageThese are all very valid inconsistencies when doing real tv/film, but they turn into advantages when doing porn video's.. imagine porn stars spontaneously duplicating, or extra hands when doing handjobs..
>>107048446
>>107050342Nico Robin doujins but with AI.
>>107050118It's actually logarithmic, i.e. much slower.
really glad resources are being used for twitter people to make AI sitcom slop.just fantastic stuff all around
>>107048446>attractive white people>not a darkie in sightbased chink AI
>>107048715The algo doesn't need to drinkit doesn't fuckit doesn't have mitochondria or any kind of metabolism what-so-everhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC4VCOa51u0Many such cases!
>>107048715yes? It's a sitcom
>>107048487>>107048520>>107048555All those things are entertaining, it's similar to spotting a reference in current movies. You can say to friends "have you seen that hand" and have fun talking about the glitches. With conspiracy friends you can then talk about the glitches you saw in real life. Fans of low quality shitcoms will slurp that slop.
>>107050118You're full of shit.Jet aircraft were mass produced in 1944, which is only 40 years since 1903 and over 80 years ago. Prototypes were already flying in 1939.
>>107048458Lmao idiot, they can produce countless hours of this garbage right now no need 2-3 years. It's more like 10 years until it actually does what you want.
>>107050118Retard-kun, the wright brothers achieved the goal of flying through the air. The AI models have not achieved the goal of convincing video. This isn't complicated.
It's funny to read math illiterates argue about how slow is one of the fastest research fields of all time. Every month there's something new, just don't focus on companies but on real research just wait for a new Lecun, Lillicrap, Schulman ect to make a breakthrough. The training data/power plateau problem is only true if you consider attention heads to be the peak of what we can do. >t. shitty RL PhD that pumps out papers like "we can improve this model by 1% youhouuuu"
15 years ago this was science fictionNot it is reality15 years from now it will be not possible to differentiate real video from generated one if that was intent when generating it.Probably much earlier even.
>>107051450>15 years ago this was science fictionCitation needed.
>>107050118Funny how every reply to this calls the anon a moron but then actually reinforces his point. This truly is the board of gamma kings.
i laughed at this clip more than i have at any episode of friends so i think it's already preddy gud
>>107048612>it'll get better after we've already flooded the net with shit that the ai will train on, contracting digital mad cow disease
>>107051471Burden of proof is on you bro, no tech existed publicly back then to do THIS.If you claim it did, PROVE IT
>>107051560>this thing is real!>prove it>n-no uAre doomers always like this?
>>107048446>any year after 2010>sitcom>no BIPOCsbased aislop fighting for the Cause
>>107051560No, it's your burden of proof that it was used it in Science Fiction.
>>107048612ok well why not show it to me when its done. whats with the status updates with this unwatchable garbage? the video in the OP is only barely better than a normal episode of friends. you dont see my mcdonalds chef come to my table with my big mac and say like "hey check it out, i got the 2 buns, just need the patty and the condiments" yeah ok go back and finish it dude
>>107048943as if work in media wasn't already extremely vapid and soulless, hurray
>>107050066this is the artistic equivalent of a boomer t-shirts with wolf/moon/flaming skull graphics
>>107048446more entertaining than the original and just as funny
>>107051471point on the map to the business addresses of the superclusters of 100,000s of GPUs used to create the models.
>>107048787>diminishing returnsReturns are still returns dumbass. I'm not even hyped about AI but lumping "quality of work" and "total work done" as the same value is retarded, since quality can fall but work done can only increase.
>This is fully AI generated in LTX-2why is he trying to convince the reader like it isn't obvious
>>107048446>"muh AI">implying that money is somehow lost when spentYou are a retard.
Zoomers using tiktok ironically watch similar slop and are happy with it.
>>107048446Just another trillion bro..... it's around the corner just two weeks... if you could spare another 100 trillion, I swear, I'm good for it
>>107048446Ok and porn?
>>107048446I think the current technology could work fine if you do just a little more than just blindly saying anything it spits out with prompting is good enough. Heavy use of controlnet, masking for depth, etc. You'd still need professionals but the workflow would change drastically as each step would literally be built from the previous. Closer to animation than live action. You'd go script->storyboard->AI video->Heavy editing. Each stage could benefit from previous workflows as well obviously. https://github.com/un1tz3r0/controlnetvideo
>>107048882It needs to gen a stickfigure 3D storyboard first, where it and the editor can apply some common sense to the physics, movement and object relations. Then you edit the storyboard, then it gens the video.
>>107049960>Personal computers in the 90s were slow and crashed all the timethey were fast for their time and only crashed when the weird software you were trying was poorly written
h1b status?
>>107049448>why the AI industry is the only one in the world that launches unfinished and obviously bad productssilicon valley tech bros are anticonsumer and antiregulation, and want to grift investment funds. they have become increasingly desperate in the face of chinese innovation
>>107051944>Returns are still returns dumbassbased retard. If you spend $100 and get $1, that $1 is still a return despite it being less than what it was spent. There is no reason why a ROI can't be negative.
>>107049422sure what's your phone number
>>107051944While true semantically real systems are often subject to negative returns beyond a certain point.For instance you need protein to build muscle, but if you eat so much that you get liver problems you gonna build less.
>>107048446This changes EVERYTHINGHollywood is DEADWriters are FINISHEDActing is OVER
>>107052387>If you spend $100 and get $1, that $1 is still a return despite it being less than what it was spent.COMPLETELY removed the context of the statement and strawmanned it where it wasn't applied.>>107048787This is the ONLY argument that;>>107051944is replying to.You have changed the conversation completely from one about the base technology itself being iteratively improved, to some spot return at some undefined time along it's implementation.>>107052454>While true semanticallyNo, it's true materially. Once an advancement in a technology is discovered, it's discovered. It's banked knowledge. It's now free for the patent holder to use, and once the patent expires anyone can use it.>For instance you need protein to build muscle, but if you eat so much that you get liver problems you gonna build less.This analogy can be defeated by the mere observation that AI doesn't have a fucking liver you enormous retarded cunt.
>>107048446"Smelly Cat. Smelly Cat. What are they feeding you?"*Random guy in the background walks by*"Ah-ha-ha-ha-ha!"*sits with a completely different group of friends*
What use is all of this new content exactly? So much has already been produced. Why not just go consume that?
>>107048446Oh look, it can mimic worthless garbage. This will be revolutionary.I fucking hate people. I wish they had never gotten smartphones and stuck to paying for cable TV. They don't deserve the internet.
Would be cool if AI could make decent footage out of scripts
>>107048446>The Will Stancil Show isn’t entertaining Wrong
>>107051450This makes sense but can you really make improvements on something forever? As far as we know they could hit a hard wall at any moment, or perhaps they could hit a massive discovery. I'm not saying you're wrong but it's really unknowable, no reason to speak on it like it's fact just because 15 years ago it was unfeasible.
>>107052361>
>>107054945To me it seems very unlikely that the current algorirhms or anything similar will achieve those goals.It would be a huge coincidence if the first somewhat successful AI algorithms just scaled indefinitely. I think there will be a long plateau.
>>107049448Guess you don't play video games?
>>107048446>everyone is white in AI sitcomsnow do a black sitcom what will happen?
>>107048446AI could never write Heil Honey, I’m home
>>107049448Samsung, Google, and Apple are right there, man what are you talking about about?
>>107048624How many trillions of dollars had to go into film before something longer than 10 seconds with any kind of narrative consistency was made?
>>107053560I always wonder about that. Especially with porn. Why is new porn being produced every day? Sex chats I even somewhat understand, but just normal movies. Oh this girl's boobs are 2 millimeters bigger/smaller than the last one's, this makes this production truly unique.
fuck is wrong with people?if you told me 5 years ago we'd be able to generate totally AI made videos with audio from text prompts or have fucking $20,000 live-in home robots like fucking detroit: become human I'd say you had covid and were retardedhow is this not more incredible
>>107048446Will Smith eating spaghetti was more funny than this
>>107055251i am also still amazed by everything AI does. most people seem to get used very fast to anything. if aliens arrive tomorrow, it'll be a few moments of awe and then only bitching that they're not enough this or that.
Looks like a Friends rip-off.I don't like the original, why would I like an AI copy of it?
>>107055251that's the problem, it seems to be perpetually in a state between fascinating and useful. If it could only get over that final hurdle but it doesn't seem to be possible, everything is always impressive but just not good enough to be useful, and in 10 years if it hasn't collapsed it'll be the same story
>>107055251I'm genuinely impressed that people have pulled it off, it's a cool technical achievement.But I have high standards for the movies I watch, or the code I write. There are thousands of mediocre movies already that I consider a waste of time, but if I get really bored I could watch some of them. Or I could rewatch some classics, or read one of the thousands of classic books and so on.Content has very little value unless it's absolute top quality.
>>107055385Absolutely, but the speed that this technology is progressing is boggling my mind. I almost would assume aliens are involved or something.>>107055381Fair enough. Its just...wild to me. Totally wild.
>>107055346yeah that does sound like people. It feels like you could show them teleportation or something and after a few days it'd be "Eh whatever, who cares?"
>>107055381>pictures: still obviously AI generated, but good enough so let's move on>text: still obviously AI generated, but good enough so let's move on>video still obviously AI generated, but good enough so let's move onnow I'm really curious where they'll go next, maybe this is how the bubble pops when they've run out of primitives to emulate
>>107049448You all called me retarded, but quality really is an outdated concept. For both businesses and consumers.
>>107055251This stuff is like the experimental fusion reactor that hasn't yet been demonstrated to be viable.You can say "oh shit it's cool" but it's shitting out SHIT. Do you really want to watch garbage like this as your entire source of entertainment? Are you that starved for slop?It needs to be cleaned up to approach anything resembling sensible and that cleanup process is going to take longer than that the last three years of worthless hype.>>107055407If your magic teleportation shat out a sickened mess of wet muscle and pulsating organs mewling "plz kill me" then yes I'm going to say fucking whatever.
>>107048590>.sometimes her arms bend bacK
Just realized why Jews want to fill world with AI bots.
>>107048446It's worse than that Seinfeld twitch thing from a few years ago.
>>107048715Perhaps we need...a sitcom about...bad ai! Where it's the joke!
>>107048555checkbut fyi this must be made by someone in europe since that is the way doors have been opened since mid ages
>>1070552515 years ago I would have been impressed, now they come out with a new version every 2 months that's still dogshitsora 2 is shit too, they can train on all the synthetic blender videos they want but actual camera movement STILL fucks it just as much as before
>>1070501181. The entire US economy wasn't dependent on the wright brothers figuring out flight.2. The first commercial flight was in 1914, 12 years after the wright flyer was flown, and it wasn't the wright flyer that flew.AI doesn't have 75 years to get good and the industry knows it, otherwise they'd still be in R&D. AI is like they saw the wright flyer, decided we'd be good to go, and started building airports everywhere.
>>107048458already starting, SVI and Holocine
Are the kiwitroons ddosing Hiro's smart buttplug again or what's going on?
used with lightx2 lora for speed so not as high quality but they already do more than 5 seconds, this is holocine
another holocineNot sora 2 quality yet but getting closer
>>107057431>>107057420where's the porn
>>107058158this is a blue board sir
>>107058192yeah but catbox isn'tgenerate me something I'd be interested in friend
>>107058194https://files.catbox.moe/17x6f3.mp4
>>107058209Alright Kingyou convinced meI'm gonna try this out. What GPU do you have? Think a 3070 is too shit?But thank you
>>107058216that was this lora on wan2.2 btw, holocine is T2V only atm and is movie focusedhttps://civitai.com/models/2086141/dogeza?modelVersionId=2360344
I love AI so muchhttps://files.catbox.moe/m7ip43.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/z6yko5.mp4
>>107058216and that will be slow as fuck, even a 3090 is cutting it short these days, 5070 TI super 24GB in a few months hopefully
>>107058225>>107058231Ah, fair enough. I wanted to use Wan 2.2, but, uhhlmao. Pic related.I could upgrade my rig, I'm just lazy and right now prices are fucked>>107058229Based lolichad? what'd you use?
>>107049448>unprecedented powerful tech>obviously badAre you fucking high, mate?
>>107048446AI was entertaining 2 years ago.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgDFzWvH1NE
>>107058238Grok Imaginehttps://files.catbox.moe/jnzbq0.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/9ccbha.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/ia9hv1.mp4
>>107048446Never, there is only a finite amount of training data.
>>107058364isn't that a webservice? How the fuck did you get past the censors?
>>107058414they censored it not too long ago, they bait and switched that shit
>>107058445FUCK
i love how these people always dramatically state "this is fully AI generated" as if a) it's not immediately obvious and b) it's a good thing
How can you even look forward to this as a consumer? I get it if you're a scammer dreaming about making an AI anime or something and getting rich, but you're obviously not interested in being entertained by the slop you create with AI... right? nobody on earth wants to see this but its being pushed like a big game of chicken.
>>107048446just 7000 trillion billion more
>>107048546But it’s more fun to watch then literally any AI video after the first Will Smith spaghetti
>>107057431Isn’t Holocine just prompt editor that tries to split the prompt into multiple prompts that sound similar?
>>107059773No, its a wan finetune that has a new attention method that allows for longer videoshttps://github.com/kijai/ComfyUI-WanVideoWrapper/pull/1566
>>107059778Idk if it will be able to do whole movies. Context length is something all AI systems struggle with because of the inherent exponential cost of generating longer segments, and all of the methods that go around it just screw it up and increase hallucination.
>>107048446I would rather see them have an orgy
>"That's our Sadako!" *laugh track*
>>107048446I like the laugh track from hell.
Remember when canned laughter was done by real people? Now you can just generate it cause har har so funneee xDDD
>>107048487that's the least weird part of the clip
>>107048446It's better than Friends, I will give it that
>>107049448Because techbros are mentally ill, they will try to reinvent the wheel but make it 10 times worse and with an app and a subscription Shit like pic related, ‘smart’ anything, hyperloop etc
>>107051471https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVdOr0z6X7Y
>>107051100>they can produce countless hours of this garbageThey can produce 10 seconds of it and then someone has to splice them together, stfu pajeet
>>107048446the positive part of ai is that it will kill normie social media dead and people will run away into smaller forums that police ai shit.
>>107060045laughtracks are fucking horrible. I guess I'm autistic or something but I genuinely don't understand why audiences are okay with that shit.
Interesting how an aryan women with artistic skill can use AI to good effect, it’s almost like jeets are cursed to make nothing but shit no matter what crutch they use.
>>107048787I can use local ai to do some crazy shit, like way better than i could do earlier this year even, not to mention 2 years ago. We are very much still seeing productive returns. Just maybe not as good as we were hoping or promised.Openai is pivoting from agi to give people more ai powered tools. those tools will be used to collect data and train the next wave of ai models
>>107049448>Can someone explain to me why the AI industry is the only one in the world that launches unfinished and obviously bad products and is proud of it?have you played any video games in the last 10-15 years bro? Ever heard of bethesda?this is a huge issue in tech its just a little bit more obvious and blatant in the AI space, because they just cherry pick the best use cases and it makes it look like black magic
>>107048446What a nightmare
>>107049448stop noticing
>>107048446i re-uploaded it because the x post was copyright claimedhttps://files.catbox.moe/s709o2.mp4
>>107064266LMAO
>>107048960No it can't because it's impossible to define subjective taste and in the context of what we understand as AI, would require magnitudes more processing power and training, and that's assuming you can even train "taste" or "sensibilities" into a model. I mean a lot of professional work is basically effectively predicting your customer's reaction to something which is often tied to gut feelings so a hard requirement for AI would be the ability to learn on the fly based on prior experiences months or years ago.
>>107064266> fist with the guitar starts floatingGenuine kek. The rest is total trash, thanks for reuploading.
>>107063952It do be like that, Mr Stancil
>>107064266i love analyzing the weird shit in the scenes like this. > top left: girl in purple shirt is playing the guitar too?> top right: guitar has two holes and that girl just did a spin and cloned herself> bottom left: two open doorways to the same hall. two guys in white shirt are seen in the hall but one of them vanishes.> bottom right: woman has a pair of boxers mixed with an apron and like a strange device on her back, probably trying to make it a guitar on her back worn with a strap
>>107052340No, they were slow even at the time, people knew they were slow but they were faster than alternatives. But nobody who used a computer would call it fast. Today's computers are fast.
>>107048446That vid is CRAP.
>>107048715that's funnier than the original show... ai won
