so...which one is it?
OSI model is the correct one.The others assume that different layers are merged because TCP/IP handle all of the missing layers without having to code it yourself.
(1) Physical(2) Digital
OSI died decades ago.
>>107050647Doesn't matter. I used to Software Engineering, DevOps, and now Network Engineering, and I rarely think about these. You just need to understand what encapsulates what. And understand the actual protocols.
>>107051420>I rarely think about these. You just need to understand what encapsulates what.read that again, slowly
/g/ doesn't even know the 8th layer hehe
>>107051420>I only work with the application layer>therefore there is no stackretard
>>107053401I was your mom's 8th layer last night
>>107053418I've worked with the entire stack dumb fuck. OSI model is absolutely useless except for filtering the most entry level retards. If I work with TCP traffic, I won't be thinking: "urrrm TCP is layer 4. This is critical." You'll be thinking about the actual protocols of the stack. Like Ethernet, IP, and TCP. OSI model is only useful if you're retarded.
