>https://www.pcgameshardware.de/AMD-Radeon-Grafikkarte-255597/News/RDNA-1-und-2-Finaler-Radeon-Treiber-fuer-Battlefield-6-und-Bloodlines-2-1485427/AMD dropped RDNA1 and RDNA2 support, RDNA2 didn't even made it to 5 years, Turing is still supported in the foresable future and just received DLSS4, unlike RDNA2/3 that haven't gotten FSR4 and apparently RDNA2 will never get itDropping support for Vega was bad but barely justifiable due to how dogshit Vega was and the significant changes in RDNA, still completely anti consumer since Vega parts in APUs had less than two years of support, but RDNA2 it's their most popular arch since Polaris and still supported on consoles If Intel had better Linux support they would be a no brainer now
oh, Ryzen Z2 APUs launched this year with RDNA2 iGPUs, so AMD support on some parts is measures in months
>>107056177WTF why??? I think it's time to move to loonix, at least mesa is good.
>>107056177Wow, Windows users have really been getting the shaft recently when it comes to hardware support...Glad I use Mesa.
>>107056259>Glad I use Mesa.Adrenaline = Milk, Mesa = Wine.LACT for GPU control (oc, uv, fans) without the adrenaline bloat.
>>107056209i forgot about ryzen 100 parts that they were announced a few days ago, AMD now has support measured in negative days >>107056338there's still quite some drawbacks on GNU/Linux, Mesa's implementation of anti-lag 2 is far from what you get on windows or with nvidia reflex (and it hasn't released yet since it was merged for mesa 25.3), there's nothing mike VSR unless you build a pretty bad implementation of it with a patched gamescope, and things like AFMF 2 simply don't exist (unless you consider the recent port of lossless scaling a replacement)
>>107056209APUs get support long after discrete cards actually Happened with the OG Excavator chips, even Raven Ridge
>>107056177That's strange, my Vega works fine and it apparently has raytracing now.
>we've stopped tweaking your card to look good in benchmarksliterally the end of the worldhow will we cope
amdrones are subhuman
>>107056177Those are windows 10-era cards. You shouldn't be using those anymore.
>>107056177what game doesn't work
They still make new RX 6600 cards lol
>>107056636Vega is awful with current games, even on Linux despite the massive work put in through RADV Polaris aged way better specially on Linux
>>107056177A source in english because this is an english speaking boardhttps://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpu-drivers/new-amd-driver-snubs-radeon-rx-5000-6000-gpus-with-latest-updates-also-disables-usb-c-functionality-on-rx-7900-series
>>107056997GTA VI might not work, they should had waited at least until then >>107056985RX 6*50 cards launched after Windows 11
>>107057070Different anon, I was using a Radeon VII up until last year in Linux and it was just fine for me as long as I kept my expectations in check. Black Myth Wukong ran okay in my case.
>>107057096>>107056177I got a question will this affect their "workstation" gpu's based on RDNA 1 & 2 (e.g. Radeon Pro w6800)? If it does then yikes, I'll stop buying Radeon and go with Intel or some chinesium competitor in the future.
>>107057243the last Radeon Pro driver release for RDNA2 was back in July with 25.Q3, RDNA2 was officially dropped on windows back then, dunno about ROCm on GNU/Linux, haven't checked >This is the final driver release that includes support for AMD RDNA1 and RDNA2 architectures>https://www.amd.com/en/resources/support-articles/release-notes/amd-software--pro-edition-25-q3-for-linux-release-notes.html
They are not dropping support, they are dropping game-specific optimizations.>>107057364>linux
>>107057070You're full of shit. A Vega 64 absolutely rapes an RX 580 whether it's on Windows or Linux.>>107057110>GTA VI might not workWhy wouldn't it, you fucking retard? Are you expecting DirectX 13 to be announced before it comes out and GTA VI to be exclusive to it? Rockstar make their games playable on as wide a range of hardware as possible to cash in on the online mode. GPUs don't just suddenly stop working with APIs they already support because they're no longer getting """""optimizations""""" for the latest titles, which has always been a fucking marketing ploy to fool retarded, tech-illiterate gaymer niggercattle.
>>107057514They have dropped new vulkan extension support as well.
>>107056177OP...I don't speak deustch
i find hilarious that the 6800 xt , 6900 xt and 6950 are stronger than the 9060 XT on most games but somehow they are stopping supporting them so people upgrade to that dogshit card lmao,
>>107057519you are a literal functionaly illiterate retard, I never claimed a RX580 beating a Vega 64, and it seems you have no idea how fucking dogshit the entire API shitfest has been since forever alongside with dogshit compilers and completely retarded gamedevs enjoy your random artifacts and games randomly crashing
>>107057806it looks like it's a pure cost reduction measure, if they wanted people to upgrade they would had never developed INT8 FSR4
>>107057848The Radeon 6750 GRE was announced in October 2023 this make no sense outside of some retarded move to force people to upgrade into the dogshit RDNA4 architecture and sell fakeframes and raytracing. https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-announces-two-radeon-rx-6750-gre-models-at-269-10gb-and-289-12gb
>>107057243w6800 still works, as well as consumer RDNA 2 6800 and up. (gfx1030)
>>107057828not the other anonbut I haven't had any issues at all with my Vega 64 on my system since I got itall is playable perfectly fine still
>>107057848 it's not just the age of the 6000 series (which is still a full generation newer than Turing, which Nvidia is still supporting for the forseeable future), it's the fact that RDNA 2 has the full DX12 Ultimate feature set. Yes the ray tracing sucks, but other features like mesh shaders work just fine. And even the ray tracing can be playable if implemented well, like in Doom Dark AgesI'd even understand dropping RDNA support for lack of DX12 Ultimate support, that's what Nvidia is doing here soon with Pascal and older GPUs. But RDNA 2 can run every single new game. Dropping it is just (in the most charitable interpretation) a sign of lack of resources in a slowly dying product division, or (in the least charitable interpretation) a hamfisted attempt to boost RX 9000 sales.
>>107056177KEK, AMD strategy:> let's just give the whole market to Nvidia so we can try to compete with them in AI by allocating all of our resources to the AI chips division
>>107056177> be AMD fag> bought RTX 6950XT to play the latest games for years> won't be able to play GTA 6OH NO NO NO NO NO NO
>be me>never updated drivers for rx 6600 after setupguys what am I missing
>dropped RDNA2 supportI read the article and still refuse to believe it
>>107057903>6750 GRENo one gives a fuck about chink cards, stop getting your information exclusively from youtubers faggot
So 25% of the AMD users are dropped to legacy support based on Steam HW survey.
>>107058533Lol thats me...
>>107056177>>If Intel had better Linux support they would be a no brainer nowqrd? i thought it was pretty good, but maybe that's just the iGPUs? are the Arc optimizations they've been building up Windows-only or something?
>>107058630Maybe if you were more antisemitic then it wouldn't have been surprising at all, think on that.
AMD is consistently pretty retarded, but sometimes they're only retarded at explaining themselves. They'll probably clarify they're still going to support drivers for another 5+ years but they somehow managed to fuck up what should've been >we're not putting all the latest FSR4 features on RDNA2, but we're still going to support those cards because The RDNA2 PS5, Steam Deck, ROG Ally some other gaming handhelds, that other console that's not technically dead yet, are all still being sold and actively supported. The alternative is exceptionally retarded for them, it would mean they support CPU sockets for 8+ years but only support GPUs for 3. ...And they really need to clarify as unfortunately that's believably within the realm of their retardation.
>>107056177Does this affect the Steam Deck or is its Linux driver managed entirely by OSS devs?
>retards think that if a game doesn't explicitly mention a game in a driver update that means it won't runlmaoThat said this is a dick move, new drivers forever is one of the things NVidia does right I guess
>>107060079>new drivers foreverNvidia doesn't do this
>>107060079lolMy fermi card was gimped long before the official driver support ended, had to hunt for older drivers back in 2015/2016novideo are a bunch of evil fucks who hate the people buying their products
>>107060079
>>107060233welp everything's fucked then
ah just when i thought amd got their shit together they remembered the anothermarketingdisaster
>>107056338has anyone tried to port mesa to windows?
>>107060607https://www.geeks3d.com/dl/show/10235post benchmarks
>>107057070I use a radeon VII and its literally never been better on linux, the emulated rt support is good enough now, that I can actually run metro exodus redux at a reasonable framerate, its about as fast as an rx 6600 despite lacking any dedicated hardware.
>>107056177it was already obsolete when it released, that's why nobody bought it
Why are nvidiots so upset about this? That used 6700XTs mog their *60 cards even without drivers?
>>107060267amd and nvidia are cousins
>>107061446>nvidiotsexcuse me, I'm an Intel-lectual
>>107060987Radeon VII has DP4A support as well, rdna1 lacked that
>>107056338>ReLive is bloatretard
>>107057046...source?
>>107062449B-b-but AMD Unboxed
It’s not so much that AMD is EOL’ing RDNA2 that makes me upset, it’s that they’re doing so without ever having given the cards the support they deserve. Just make your INT8 path for FSR4 official so we’re not living in the fucking stone age anymore and then you can drop support. It’s not just the wrong move, it’s the exact opposite of the right one.
my 6700XT has idle (!) coil whine so I'm not exactly eager to keep it forever anyway
>>107060618Unfortunately this is just Mesa's software renderers compiled to Windows. Would definitely be cool if the Gallium3D or Vulkan drivers could be ported over, but that would require the kernel drivers to expose a public interface.
So somebody at amd leaked the int8 fsr4 version probably because at that point they already knew rdna2 is getting axed. Shame it needs an ancient driver to function properly. Would've been a nice, albeit still premature, sendoff if it worked with the latest whql driver.
>>107056177>AMD dropped RDNA1 and RDNA2 supportOn Mustdie. Linux priests are unaffected.And, I'm gonna say something controversial, it's been long due. Not only do they lack hardware features 7000 series and onward have, the cards were released amid the second mining boom, and everyone raped them like Epstein raped kids.>due to how dogshit Vega wasIt was good back when it was launched, ESPECIALLY considering the following first mining boom. A 2400G was the only way to game for many guys back there.
>>107063801Let me guess, Sapphire Nitro+?
Does Linux even get the equivalent of game optimisation? I know that they're independent/community maintained and receive updates/features but how does it actually compare to the support/features AMD gives the Windows drivers?
>>107064247use linux
>>107064376I'm not transsexual enough for that.
>>107064406you can be cis and use linuxeasier than installing a random 2023 driver to use upscaling lol
>>107064419That's the thing, I'm not willing to install a random 2023 driver just to use upscaling lol
"AMD clarifies that RDNA 1 and 2 will still get day zero game support and driver updates — discrete GPUs and handhelds will still work with future games"https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpu-drivers/amd-clarifies-that-rdna-1-and-2-will-still-get-day-zero-game-support-and-driver-updates-discrete-gpus-and-handhelds-will-still-work-with-future-games
>>107064441Me neither.
>>107064481Okay.
>>107064454B b but my outrage
>>107064419>use loonix>easier than installing a driverDisingenuous tranny? What a shocker.
so this is a windows-only issue?
>>107064563There is no issue.
>>10706380199% of new gpus have coil whine, it's now become completely normal, consumers have accepted it and manufacturers keep decreasing production quality more and moreso yeah, I wouldn't get a new card for that reason, unless you're willing to buy and return a dozen of them until you find one that's tolerable.
>>107059763mainly managed by OSS devs so it won't affect the deck
>>107061446this means nvidia cards going up 50% is perfectly justifiable
>>107064454they straight up said they won't"New features, bug fixes and game optimizations will continue to be delivered as required by market needs in the maintenance mode branch," an AMD spokesperson told Tom's Hardware.
