Debian + GNOME + arch in a distrobox + flatpaks
Use case for Arch?
>>107063797> Usecase for sodomy
>>107063791gnome ruins debian
>>107063838mfw>install debian>check the "debian desktop" box>ends up with GNOME
>>107063791Debian+xfce+as few flatpaks as possible
>>107063791>Debianok>GNOME + arch in a distrobox + flatpaksruined
Gentoo openrc xfce
>>107063791Arch + KDE + cachyos repos
>>107064103Tranny + tranny + tranny
>>107063791No
>>107064298Pesky shill
>>107063791absolutely vile, might unironically prefer windows to that
tf is a distrobox
>>107063791The perfect GNU+Linux setup:GNU Guix + GNU Mes + GNU Shepherd + GNU mcron + GNU Guile + GNU Emacs + EXWM
>>107063791For me it's Arch + Xfce + AppImage
How do you guys manage to distrohop without breaking everything?
>>107064695Use separate drives
>>107064569Why?
>>107064295No I like my setup better
For me, it's Mint.I just want to get everything up and running with minimal headaches so I can get my work done.
>>107065859/thread
>>107063791>flatpaksCorpo bloat with planned micro-transactions. If you are on Arch just use normal repos.
>>107066184>planned micro-transactionsSauce?
>>107064695I have my main drive with mint. And then another drive as a distro whore which I put multiple distros for testing, sometimes more than one a day. I like my hobby.
>>107063791>distro is so bland you need to run an entire extra distro in a container
>>107068041>distro is so retarded you need to run it in a container
>gnu/systemd/linuxcringe
>>107063791It's so perfect you cope with Arch on a distrobox. Just use Arch directly, pussy.
>>107070130Debian has official support for shit like davinci, rocm etc. No point in chaning the stable base when Flatpaks exists and for niche cases distrobox. Yea, there might be some kernel improvements, but whatever...
>>107070324So? You can pick the Deb file and convert to Arch. You don't know what stable means in Linux, it's not that it doesn't crash, it's that the version is purposely not updated to a new major version until the OS itself is updated. If you tell this to users they'll probably think again about installing "stable" distributions.
>>107071043You arch trannies are like groomers
>>107064647What are they gonna do to her?
>>107063791Micay don't trust deb packages. There might be something to it.
>>107072818>that look of determination*gulp*
>>107066184>normal reposmeans running malware roulette from the AUR
>>107073230>GNUed. com
>>107073234AuR is not normal repo it's user repo. Your corpo repos also have history of malware, github is full of malware but you only see AuR because you were trained like dog to hate it.
>>107067323
>>107074122you can use flatpaks without flathub, retard-kun.
>noobs have to make a franken-distro out of multiple different distros plus distrobox and flatpaks just to get a system that is stable and up to dateMeanwhile I just use Gentoo, the only distro that lets you combine stable and bleeding edge packages on the same system. Get on my level chuds.
>>107072243I don't give a crap about retarded stereotypes like trannies using Arch. Niggers use Debian and I don't see anyone complaining. The reality is the large majority of users want the latest stable vanilla packages and it better have lots of packages, and that's Arch, or CachyOS. You can also use NixOS but that requires a bigger learning curve. Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mint, or whatever traditional distribution, does not give you that. You have to cheat with Flatpaks and then complain it's garbage that's not quite compatible with the OS libraries.
Fair.For me it's Devuan + LXQt + AppImage + Windows in KVM with RDP
Flatpaks? Why? Don't they just suck? Slow, hit or miss at best and overall just bloat? apt works fine, pacman works fine, emerge too. Except dnf that thing just sucks.
>>107075422flatpak has always sucked
>>107075422A fixed release distro + flatpak / snap / appimage is pro tier. You can enjoy a stable system while still having up to date apps.
>>107071043>You can pick the Deb file and convert to Arch
>>107075548This. There's literally no reason to run arch when you can run Debian and run Arch programs in distrobox or flatpaks. Debian doesn't shit itself when you updoot
>>107072243>You arch trannies are like groomersAnd debian straight up has groomers
>>107076157wow that's so much worsecheckmate chuds>tfw we won this argument