[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: OSI.png (126 KB, 1880x1160)
126 KB
126 KB PNG
what exactly is the session layer. have you ever seen a "layer 5 problem" in your job
>>
>>107067574
Cookie and authentication stuff
>>
>>107067574
It's something from OSI.
OSI doesn't exist anymore.
>>
>>107067593
but HTTP is layer 7
>>
>>107067779
I don't think HTTP ever ran on OSI.
>>
>>107067779
http is stateless by design, so it doesn't have a session layer
>>
It's a model, you stupid fucking nigger. it doesn't depict the actual state of any given stack. If engineers adhere to the OSI model, you'd have a session layer. Most people use TCP/IP, even if they don't know that they do. And you can even create abominations that won't fit into any model.
>>
>>107068326
black retard gorilla nigger has never seen section 2 of X.225
>>
>>107068442
nobody cares about irrelevant boomer shit
>>
>>107068442
a protocol doesn't make the layer you nigger. It's a matter of implementation. Each layer only exists if it's explicitly implemented by the engineers. OSI model is strictly a suggestion.
>>
>>107068486
The OSI model is a description of ISO's competitor to the Internet, which is dead.
>>
>>107067574
I've never understood this shit
import requests, make your gets, and be done
>>
>>107068693
>I've never understood this shit
lost exactly nothing
>>
>>107067574
Nfs&rpc.
>>
>>107068971
cheers
oh, and happy Halloween
>>
>>107068693
And most of the time that's all you need to know. But sometimes the thing you want to do doesn't work, and you won't understand why if you know nothing about the layers below it.
https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/11/11/the-law-of-leaky-abstractions/
>>
>>107068693
but the guy who writes requests has to understand this shit. niger
>>
I'm fimware dev and I deal mostly with data link, sometimes with network or physhical.
Web weenies are not software developers.
>>
>>107067574
funny troll posting the solution to the ruse in the image itself. i write embedded software for 8 bit controllers and i still get people asking me to make code more resemble the osi model.
session layer? i think session layer is the most translatable abstraction onto tcp.
why arent you asking what the fuck presentation layer is?
>>
>>107068693
>i never understood any of the shit that is abstracted away from what i am using
>>
Networking is dumb. That shit should be easy, like plumbing. Just turn on the tap and water comes out. Why make it more complicated than it needs to be?
>>
>>107070921
I like that tap analogy. Yeah that's how networking should be done: You connect to the internet and all kinds of packets come flooding into your machine.
>>
>>107070999
>I have six inches of "hello good morning sirs" in my basement. Can I get someone out here today to look at my router?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.