If this ends up failing we are literally gonna end up having Google monopoly on the internet.The guys at Mozilla are one of the worst people that are handling the only realistic alternative to chromium right now. It will not hold on for another 5 years and its already crumblign.
>>107077067Firefox just works.Also you are forgetting aboutServo, it still exists. Supported by the Linux foundation.
>>107077067>we are literally gonna end up having Google monopoly on the internet.
>>107077089>rustMay as well use chrome/chormium.
>>107077127Most retarded viewpoint i have ever heard
>>107077127>>rustWho gives a fuck?
>>107077142Who gives a fuck about using chrome? It just works and works great.
>>107077127>might as well suck fat sweaty corpo dick to own the troons
>>107077067What's up with the sudden corpo obsession with lissajous curves?
>>107077067What am I looking at here?
>>107077165I'd rather suck mutilated corpo kike dick than mutilated frankensteined-thigh-flesh troon dick.
>>107077173browser project ran by the guy who made serenityOS, Andreas Kling. Alpha release in 2026.
>>107077190And it won't be based on Chromium?
>>107077198it follows the idea of serenityOS where they dont reuse code and they are making it from scratch albeit using libraries like ffmpeg etc. when its necessary
>>107077214This thing will die without extension support.
>>107077176>I'd rather suck mutilated corpo kike dick than mutilated frankensteined-thigh-flesh troon dick.Or just not suck any dick you faggot, servo is managed by the linux foundation and using a software form someone you don't like doesn't mean endorsement unless you are that fucking retarded, by that logic you are a google shill.
>>107077230>This thing will die without extension support.You don't know that. It could become something good but it can also fail it's too early to even talk about scenarios.
>>107077255>You don't know that.Do you mean he doesn't know it will die without extensions? Or he doesn't know that it won't have extensions? If they've confirmed no extension support "ever" then I'm inclined to agree with that anon. If it's just a far-in-the-future-but-certainly-in-the-plans thing, then yeah, I can understand giving them time.
>>107077176Have you tried not sucking dicks?
>>107077067cuck license
>>107077103they don't know I'm still on male poon...
>>107077165Rust is corpo dick.
>>107077165I'd suck tranny dick to own the troons. Think about it. It would only exacerbate their gender dysphoria. Therefore, sucking tranny dick is a very chuddy thing to do. Checkmate.
>>107077067We would have it already if it didn't take this autistic scorched earth approach.>LibJS, LibWasmWe already have chakra-core, license compatible and backed by Microsoft before Edge was a Chromium skin.>LibGfxIs libpng, libjpeg, etc not enough?>LibMedialibmpv? gstreamer? >LibCoreQt already does those things
>>107077067I interviewed at Mozilla to work on Firefox. Maybe I'll help save it from... nothing it works great
>>107077127Why should I give a shit if I'm not planning to compile it myself
>>107077067>written in swift
>>107078654I thought Swift was Apple-only? Am I retarded?
>>107077418>KDE creates KHTML>ganoo lesr jeet pee el>Apple steals it>Google steals it>baat its lesr ganoo not just ganoo>FreeBSD>Apple "steals" it>there is two macoses, but not two safaris>Sony "steals" it>Playstations can be liberated by installing actual OS>intel "steals" minix>secrets of intel me revealed>fbi tries to backdoor openbsd>gets fucked>openssh using worldwide>fbi tries to backdoor linux>systemdPermissive licenses are honeypots for corpos
>>107077067Change the logo.
>>107079317where they can't steal they'll just replicatepermissive makes it easier for them but it's not like a different license would prevent them from doing what they want
>>107077964Apart from the actual rendering and scripting that they're doing themselves then I think these are just libraries for another library. I'm pretty sure they do use Ffmpeg, for example, but if you ever look at say Firefox's code they still have their own media libraries used internally that in link against a vendored Ffmpeg.This is just a normal and clean way for them to structure the code.
>>107079417I also doubt they'll be writing their own Cryptography libraries either because that is retarded. They must surely be using OpenSSL or similar, no?Or just because Firefox has NSS (which is maybe on the way out) they are going to do this themselves too?
>>107077165>advanced /pol/ techniqueit actually works though
>>107077067>ladywe are screwed
>>107077067I compiled it on arch and it just keeps failing with some error related egls
>>107077067I don't know what happened to Mozilla/Firefox but they started pushing ads on Twitch streams, looks like they are finally trying, and Twitch is a good way. Remember how Discord got so famous? Yes it all started on Twitch
>>107077964So you just want a new UI (i.e. chrome) over an existing engine? There are a million firefox and chrome reskins out there. There are even all sorts of webkit browsers. What do you think these guys might have for you that any one of those don't?
>>107077230>>107077255>>107077286Last year a Ladybird developer said:>No plans, other than "we want extensions eventually". There's a very rough WebExtensions spec, I believe based on how the other browsers' extensions work, which I assume we'll follow. But the focus for now is just on making the browser run the web well.https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/issues/976#issuecomment-2269710093
>>107078654>0.6% swift>1.9% cmakeWritten in cmake.
>>107079425They used to have their own crypto libraries from serenity, but I think they switched to openssl after the forkMy understanding of their flavour of NIH is "anything specified as a web spec from scratch".
>>107081619I'm just saying they should focus solely on the LibWeb component. Having a rendering engine be even comparable to chrome is a monumental task in itself.
There is also servo and orion bringing webkit to linux.
>>107077067My nigger even an established brand like Firefox is completely irrelevant and no longer targeted or tested on by a vast number of websites. Chrome has won years ago and nothing will ever change that.
>>107083618>bringing webkit to linux.gnome web exists
>>107081710they take the stone soup view of creating a web browser
>>107077067Does anyone has that screencap where some troons were harassing Andreas to implement some kind of blacklist to websites they considered "problematic" but he told them to fuck off?>>107081678Personally I only care about ublock or an equivalent.
>>107077067OP is LADYBOYDSTFU 'bout this crap and maindev on drug rehab until public beta in 2027. THANKS
>>107077089>Servodead on arrivalif it ever arrives at all, that is
>>107079237it's not
>>107079317>>KDE creates KHTML>>Apple steals itif you read its actual history, you'll see that apple had an internal version with mac specific patches and features and that they contributed fixes and features back to khtml all the time, so much that they started to create some friction with other khtml devs that disliked applying patches from apple all the time and (idk how true this is and not just some excuse) "how" they structured their patches, so on common accord apple made their own fork called webkit (reorganizing the codebase, cleaning up some legacy code) and left the khtml devs alone. I believe even then they still traded some patches and khtml devs themselves also contributed to webkit
>>107080223>they started pushing ads on Twitch streamsOr you're blaming Firefox for using a shit adblocker.
>LadybirdSomeone please post the list of rich fascist/jewish pedophiles that sponsor the poor thing.
>>107083835I tried it earlier and I was amazed at how fucking slow it was.
Come on, Kling. It's on your shoulders.
>>107085664Not a list, but they were sponsored by kikeflare.
Alpha in 2026Delayed to 2028Beta in 2030This may become barely useable in the 2030s
>>107085521I think anon meant that firefox is being advertised on twitch. I wouldn't know, I have userscripts in my vivaldi.
>>107089188Wasted before releaseJews did that
>>107089226There's a reason writing a browser is considered to be a monumental task. You have 30+ years of standards, and probably 90% of what's used today is recently (i.e. last 20 years) standardized bloat steered by megacorporations with armies of jeets doing everything possible to make it untenable for new competition to even think about starting anything. I think putting something new together from scratch in 10 years would be commendable.
>>107085521>>107089287>I think anon meant that firefox is being advertised on twitch.exactly, when was the last time they did some marketing for firefox, either I don't remember anymore or I just missed it.
>>107089188what the hell? they should support a real distro and not a shit install script
Why would ladybird fail?
>>107089188not really flattering for ladybird to be compared to an arch install script
>>107077089>>107077137>>107077142>>107077165>>107078144>>107085664Reminder that trannies HATE Ladybird because the developers told them to fuck off and use master instead of main. No wonder they are trying to redirect you towards some Rust troonfest.
>>107090319Building a browser from scratch is really hard. It's arguably harder than building a kernel.
>>107090838Trannies hate ladybird because Andreas Kling is a literal nazi fuhrer to them. Which makes him based as fuck.
>>107077067Based but man couldn't they have picked a better name
>>107090319for any number of reasons?
>>107077067Why does that design below the name remind me of Meta Facebook (Zuckerberg)???
>>107091647There's about a 50/50 it gets rebranded before launch. However if Ladybird starts generating normie buzz, it likely won't.
