Few understand.
>>107080891>retarded soiposting thread
>>107080891Even fewer understand.
>>107080905>dude you are LITERALLY being brainwashed>shut up bigot. what about safety? do you want grandma to die?
>>107080905>gemmy caveposting bread
>>107080950Nice melty.
>>107080938HE ROUND
>cnile>projection>doesn't even know what the C logo is
>>107080891OP hereOopsie, i made a whoopsie
>>107080891how to ruin a cnile in one word: "locales"
>>107080938>implying that language is better
isn't rust a replacement for C++? why do they try to pit it against C?
>>107083041Rust is a replacement for competent white males. It's just standard iconoclastic destruction of existing culture, tradition, and ways of getting stuff done that lefties always pull during their color revolutions. It's "defund the police" for computers.
>>107080891Few understand what? That Rust was invaded by political activists? I that's well known.
>>107083096>Rust is a replacement for competent white males.Then /g/ has no reason to seethe about it since they're neither competent nor white nor males.
>>107083096No it's not retard. First if all rust was made by a while male and he did it because he was frustrated with an elevator that was always breaking. From a technical standpoint Rust is simpler C++ with "smart pointers" (not exactly but for sake of argument) integrated into the language and other modern features. The woke invaders are the ones that ruined everything, not rust itself. Woke invaders are ruining all kinds of projects, NixOS also being a victim.
>>107082901> locales Yeah, that’s a fucking mess.Luckily, in practice, you don’t really have to deal with them. C++ one-ups that attempted destruction with facets.
>>107083178You knew exactly what I was saying. Rust is being used as a direct action take over tool. Obviously a language is just a language. Esperanto is just a retarded bastard language, but the WEF wanting us all speaking it by 2030 is the problem. Common Core is mostly just "mathemagic" that smart people did intuitively, but teaching it and using it as the sole grading metric is the problem. The 5 Olds.
>>107083298*4 olds
>>107083298That's what assembly developers said of C at the time. Yes it's being used for trash like uwutils but it's also being used for decent tolls like fd. You win some and lose others.
>>107083378I fucked up it's uutils. It's still trash not because it's in rust but because if ulterior motives.
>>107082245>implying there is a true C logo and it wasnt just soulless sloppa created for blogspam like picrel
>>107083378>That's what assembly developers said of C at the timenta but that was dumbc and asm are wholly different beastsand writing *everything* in asm when a higher level language is available is profound mental retardation, aka: autismffw 50 yearswere still using asm where it makes sense torusts ambition is just to replace c-like even if thats not its usecasetheres a convergence of several interests to push for rust even if its unbakedresults? picrel. uutils vs coreutilsntm the lang itself is bad. bad syntax, too complex, retarded deployment mechanisms, wrong targetwhat the industry needs is something like c#, but faster>inb4look at the adoption rates of rust.
>>107083466>forgot picrelbc of course i did
>>107083466What are you on about? C was considered high level and slow at the time despite being safer than assembly, and veteran developers refused to use it for years, even in gaming. Even when compilers were faster than the best assembly you could do, and had some cross platform guarantees, some game developers still refused to use C. It fits today's comparison of C vs Rust, the difference that politics now are included. You're fitting your modern logic into past logic.As for needing something like C# but fast, that's doesn't make any sense. C# includes GC and VM. If you take those off it's not C# anymore. You cannot have Rust guarantees and at the same time want something like C#. If what you want is something like C#, there's Java, Kotlin, Scala, Go, and even to some extent, Python now that it has type hinting. It's fast enough for the large majority of cases. C# will never be the go to programing language in opensource because it's controlled by Microsoft.Your criticism should be further detailed because what I think you mean is that Rust is not stable enough, not easy enough, and should be simpler than what it is. What you want is a better Rust of sorts. That's my best guess. In my opinion Rust itself is not that bad compared to C or C++, it's the whole politics around it that is bad.
>>107084082>What you want is a better Rust of sorts.thats exactly what i wantim not inimical towards the idea of safety etc...i wont take advantage of it but it doesnt take a genius to understand the appeal of something like that.we have c, asm for the lower-end of stuffwe have c++ with enforced interfacing etc for higher level considerations, but given its c legacy its doing a spilt of sortstrying to do everything well enough, while being portable and safe. and thats how the lang became a jack of bloats, master of nothingi wouldnt mind seeing it completely replaced with something purpose-built for the usecase, and the era.a better rust of sorts. a lang built wiith safety etc but which is fast, and as easy to use as c#. prolly compiled otherwise its a discount java that im describing...sorry for the delayfather graced me with a surprise visit
>>107084082>>107084851heck, i wouldnt even mind a c replacementbut all thats been offered is aiming at "doing more than c"thats not whats needed.whats needed is something that does exactly what c does, only bettermodern, 2025 c has shit like using parentheses to give hints to the compiler hints on the dependency of operations, which in turn translates into asm, but written in a way that hints to the cpu, in turn, which operations can safely be out of order'd.none of that is written in the standard, none of that is properly explicit.i mean, i can work with that, but i see many people having issues, understandably sowe use c just because its the best we got.
>>107080891Rust is more of a replacement to rust than c.Still for 99% of usecases it'll be a better choice than them.
>>107082876microsoft java / 10 bait
