WTF is this?
>>107081640Age gate bullshit if you're in the UK/Ireland. Use a VPN, connect to America, reopen the app... continue as normal
>>107081650I'm not in the UK and I'm using a dutch VPN anyway. Might they be rolling it for everyone?
who the fuck carestwittercucks deserve to be lynched
Thank god they are actively destroying themselves.
>>107081688bongs were destroyed decades ago
>>107081721>bongs were destroyed decades agoI am talking about Xitter.
>>107081640nigger
It is all to stop me having sex.Sorry lads.
>>107081660Probably, wouldn't be surprised.
>>107081660euro age verification is set to come into force some time next year iirc so places are just per-empting it.similar things should be in effect worldwide by the end of the decade.
>>107082570>Laws *might* come into force in some jurisdictions, forcing you to eat shit>May as well get practising now, get used to the taste
>>107081640jews datamining
>>107081640The powers that be have a new system that has been in the development for decades now, ready to be rolled out in the coming years. It will operate in parallel starting sometime this year and by the next decade it will be fully operational as the Agenda 2030 goals are slowly being implemented.There will be no collapse, no violence, no uprising, no world war, no revolution, no killing of jews or politicians or other such fantasies. Instead there will be law & order, compliance and total surveillance until the very end. AI will be at the center of it all. The Great Reset is inevitable.
>>107082570>euro age verification is set to come into force some time next year iircIt's already in force. It's part of the Digital Services Act. Specifically article 28 of said act, calling for the protection of minors against harmful content. It does so in paragraph 1 of said article, but then in paragraph 3 excludes an obligation to perform age verification via means that involve sharing additional personal data. The EU Commission has since put out a guideline on how DSA article 28 should be interpreted which puts in black and white that they consider any means of age verification that involves sharing additional personal data, to be disproportionate and that it should not be used.X and other ad-supported platforms are bringing this to the EU territories in the guise of it being required by law, same as the UK Online Safety Act. Though in the EU - it's actually NOT required by law. (At least - not with the methods these platforms chose to deploy, since all of them involve sharing additional personal data.) The reason they're doing this now, is since it's still a very active topic hot off the heals off of the UK OSA spouting the 'think of the children'-rhetoric so that it can gain traction under normies, guilt-shaming them into not speaking up against it.The truth is - they have no legal requirement, and the Commission itself even finds these age verification methods grossly disproportionate.So why do platforms still do it then? DSA article 28, paragraph 2.Where it is reasonable end-users might be minors, they may not be exposed to targeted advertising. And they may not have ad-targeting profiles composed. Thus platforms effectively may not serve any of their end-users any targeted ads or ads that involve real-time bidding exchanges (so basically; they can't generate any income off of them) until they've proven they're of legal age.TL;DR -- they tempt you to prove your age for viewing 18+ content; while in reality you're consenting to viewing ads.
What the FUCK is this new captcha?
>>107081660Pick a VPN from a less dystopian country like Kazakhstan.
>>107081640That QR parses to hxxps[://]x[.]com/i/redirect/app_install?status_id=1773478229250134019&source=age_verification&url=hxxps[://]x[.]com/yugabmila/status/1773478229250134019
hxxps[://]x[.]com/i/redirect/app_install?status_id=1773478229250134019&source=age_verification&url=hxxps[://]x[.]com/yugabmila/status/1773478229250134019
>>107083959yugabmila is a faggot
>>107083877>What the FUCK is this new captcha?I think I found the reason might be range banned on this board.I don't have this issue.
You just show it an AI face and it works
