[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1738258343021803.webm (3.92 MB, 690x480)
3.92 MB
3.92 MB WEBM
>https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/better-image-viewer/
Strange that his dead and half-broken extension is the only sensible image viewer for firefox

As you can see you can drag-to-pan and scroll-to-zoom in a natural fashion

Does anyone happen to know if there is an equivalent for chromium? Must be open source
>>
>>107088002
literally who
>>
https://github.com/Ademking/BetterViewer
?
>>
>>107088067
Extremely bloated
>>
https://carry0987.github.io/UserJS/Tool/mpiv/website/

And
https://github.com/hoothin/UserScripts/tree/master/Picviewer%20CE+
>>
>>107088093
Aren't you looking for a bloated image viewer?
If you don't want bloat, follow the UNIX phiilosophy, download the image, and look at it in your image viewing software. Browsers having image viewers is bloat.
>>
>>107088002
buy an ad
>>
>>107088240
>be dead
>buy ad
>>
>>107088002
>image viewer for firefox
?
>>
File: 1757448180681878.png (50 KB, 1080x1080)
50 KB
50 KB PNG
>>107088002
>image viewer for firefox
>>
kek does anyone still use firefox?
>>
nigga what
>>
that's some keto ass meal
looking forward to getting on that shit for lent
>>
did the demo image have to be disgusting meat?
>>
>>107089402
Most Linux distros come with Firefox as their default browser
>>
>>107089402
yes, your shill spam doesn't work faggot, eat 6 trillion dicks
>>
>>107090244
are you talking about the dick you firefur trannies collectively cut off?
>>
>>107090244
That post is hardly an endorsement for Firefox let alone shilling.
>>
File: 1761553364397695.jpg (30 KB, 300x300)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
>>107088002
I don't really see the use case over the default options tbqh.
>>
>>107088002
>Does anyone happen to know if there is an equivalent for chromium? Must be open source
Vibecode it.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.