And if you would what would be a reasonable price to pay for it?
>>107091874Not just NO, but hell no!!!Google threatened to disable side loading apps, making android like Apple iPhone, if Google does that my next phone will be a FairPhone
>>107091874>esim onlyNo. It fucking sucks. Buy a global version instead with a sim card tray or wait until sales drop that Google is forced to bring back the sim card tray. It doesn't even have grapheneos support yet so you will have you wait a couple of months, and it will be the last pixel phone graphene and lienageos supporsts.
Nah, I'd give it a miss. I genuinely was in the market for a Pixel 10 Pro XL and I've actually tried one at a phone shop. The demo ran well and the screen was lovely and bright. Then the reviews came through and they were not good; most of them actually advising Pixel users stick with or buy the 9 Pro XL instead because there was very minor, incremental improvements between the two generations. The Tensor G5 was slated, some claiming that it was just about on par with the last gen Snapdragon 8 gen 3 SOC. Others pointed out that a flagship phone should not stutter and freeze whilst using the camera. Then Google displayed that they had all three major types of retardation by not releasing the device libs for the 10 series, immediately fucking off a major sector of their customer base, the dev scene. Even the GraphmemeOS crowd got a shitty on when their cherished, super secure, non-backdoored (from Google, yeah right!), wasn't going to be compatible for their needs going forward. So, Samsung, probably Google and most likely more OEMs are going to remove OEM unlock from their Developer Options menu, I decided to bite the bullet, leave the scene that I've been a part of since 2008 with Windows Mobile 6.1 ROM cooking and I've bought myself a Fold 7. If you can't beat them.....
>>107091874the only thing I'd buy at this point is one of the freetard phones. Pinephone, Librem, that thing that the FSF is allegedly gonna make (they wont)or a flip phone if one of those exists that doesn't have the Jewgle spyware in it (KaiOS does, IIRC)
>>107092469I wouldn't pay more than $500 for it and that's only if you're not going to put your real information on it and are goign to buy it just to wait the 60 days to pay it off and unlock it and install grapheneos on it once grapheneos comes out.
>>107091874I had the Pixel 7 and was happy with it but I moved to the iPhone 16, I think my next one when this dies will be a Pixel again
>>107092507the pixel 9 is the only real "freetard" phone out there
I'll take it for free ninety-nine. Gibs me dat nigguh!!!
>>107091874I would only buy it if I could sell it at a higher price. No grapheneOS support makes Google phones useless
>>107091874Ugly
>>107091874No, get a 9 pro and install graphene os. You pay less money and you can control whether or not you want to be a data pig for google
>>107091874$300.
>>107091874$0 unless it had GrapheneOS support
>>107092656What? Why?
>>107091874GrapheneOS was the only reason to buy Pixel. Now that Google effectively stopped the GrapheneOS project from being able to support it, there is no reason to buy it. Especially since the hardware/build quality has always been atrocious.
>giving money to g**gleGet a chinesium phone
>>107091874I use the same 250$ samsung phone for the last 4 years. It does all I need.In short you all are slurping slops and I also am smarter than you.Shove it up your ass.
>>107093928Fuck off with that poor fag cope.
i'll buy it in a year when it's half the price and install graphene on it
>>107091874I still regret my pixel 6 so no.I don't want bigger screens and thinner phones.I want shit like the titan pocket and jelly star.
I own a red magic pro 9 and an m3 MacBook Pro
>>107091874some of my code is in this thing so i wanted to get one to keep as a memorybut i wouldn't actually use it over my iphone (much like the pixel team)and i wouldn't pay any more than $100 for a paperweight
>>107092469>>>esim onlyONLY IN MURICA
>>107095940But if they didn't all use iphones would they use this phone?
>>107095940When will GrapheneOS support be added
>install graphine os or buy [chinkware bloat instead of nsa bloat]Some of us have jobs
I'm still using my iphone 4S
I want the iPhone 17 pro max and the m5 max MacBook
>>107096066who knows. if iphones weren't an option i'd use a pixel 9 with grapheneos, but the kind of psychos that work at google might have different tastes.>>107096093when the source for android 16 qpr1 is released, which is up to google.afaik they're crashing the android, chromebook and pixel teams with no survivors at the moment so it might take a while.
>>107096326>afaik they're crashing the android, chromebook and pixel teams with no survivorswell that's concerningand it would explain some of the price cuts I'm seeing (literally half off where I am rn)these new pixels must have sold like absolute shit
>>107093872Nta but I believe esim doesn’t work with Graphene OS
>>107091874the one and only reason to own this phone is to install the shitty graphene OS so you can't access banking apps, there are no other legitimate reasonsOnly price I would thus pay for this is a $100 as a second phone to my main driver iPhone, I think this phone is worth around $100, I would not give a fuck if it came with no cameras at all just flashlight, as long as I can toy around with it with GrapheneOS. Google is running a scam where they sell yuo the phone in exchange for locking you into a contract, but i looked at it and it was literally a scam so didnt go for it
>>107096824Retard.https://grapheneos.org/usage#esim-support
>>107098751>one and only reason to own this phone is to install the shitty graphene OSnot supported because Android ceased being open source so no new phone can be supported
