is my firewall good
What are you hoping to accomplish with these rules? What services are you running that a remote user might try to connect to?
>>107092591mine is better
If your only goal is to browse the web, it's probably good enough.Though if you want to set up an email client you might run into issues. Also if you want to ssh into a server in the cloud or host a gaming server, you'll have to change the firewall rules
>>107092591>posting his ipLern2opsec, newfag, prepare ur anus
>>107092762baited by private IP kek
>>107092762based retard
>>107092591>>107092741
>>107092591Use case for denying outgoing to every port under 1025 except DNS and HTTP/S?What specifically does that deny that you want to deny?
>>107094354< 1025 are the privileged ports
>linux toy firewallGet a Fortigate, faggot OP, then we can talk
summat like that. 'niggers' has a bunch of specific ips and ranges that skirted the rules one way or another. also hosts nulls a slew of urls.
>>107094544it's better to just default deny outbound and only add stuff as necessary >>107094016and then temporarily let the flood gates open for windows update and such
>>107094985it is like that. most of the time the http/s rule is disabled.run wireshark on another computer acting as a router. it will catch things you swear are impossible.also stop using mas
>>107095167>run wireshark on another computer acting as a router. it will catch things you swear are impossible.i've done sonothing happens except dns (dnscache) occasionally pinging microsoft servers but nothing is transferred of course so i don't care>also stop using maswhat?
>>107092591you should be using opensnitch to filter outgoing traffic on your desktopon server you should allow to specific hosts only