AI is so good that it's literally impossible to tell if it's fake or not. Imagine a twitter account you followed is in fact AI and you didn't know about it. Now how can you be sure all the accounts you followed are not AI?
>>107112428shadows are inconsistent with the lightingits getting better thoits gotten this one right
Same thing with text though. You never know who's a bot. Or a dog. ‿
>>107112428Normies are starting to suspect everything is fake. Everything was fake long before AI, but whatever.
Find a flaw, bitch
>>107112466>asian
>>107112466>Railings at the opposite side looked fucked up>Building window lights looked very strange, some even went outside of the building>Girl's right arm doesn't even look real>Inconsistent shadowsI swear lustful niggers don't have eyes all they do is pay attention to face and titties but not rest of the image
>>107112466asians are only attractive with brown skin + monolids. she looks like a knockoff european
>>107112466Youre just distracted by the mammaries.She's got a hand like a pelican beak, face is uncanny valley and wtf is going on with those lighting poles? Muh titz tho.
>>107112466Crab finger
>>107112466#1 it's slopped as fuck. also there's two lamp posts right next to each other among other flaws
>>107112428Wtf, is that real? I can't tell anymore.
>>107112466>thighs shorter than ankles
>>107112466double lamp
>>107112466What's up with these light poles
>>107112466Your taste in women and willingness to share it with others.
>>107112466>>107112428you can't gen
At this point I assume every picture where the hands are hidden is fake.
>>107112466It's full of flaws. Is this bait?All the aforementioned, plus:>panels next to the girl don't line up at the bottom on the nearest post>big fingernail>thumb warps through sleeve
>>107112627Hands hasn't been an indicator for such a long time now. You need to update your AI detection schema or you'll end up like the person described in >>107112460
>>10711266190+% of AI pics still have hidden or fucked up hands. Maybe it's possible to avoid now, but then most AI slop posters haven't got the memo.
>>107112466A few more flaws:>rivets aren't actually holding anything onto the bridge, they're just right there flush with a piece of flat steel>the posts holding the panels are first rectangular/I-beam, but the the second one is a wedge shape welded on to the bottom bar>litter is present to the left of the girl's legs in abundance, but there is none to the right of her legs all the way along the bridge, or anywhere else in the imageAI has definitely improved a lot, but you're stupid to be so confident about no flaws. It doesn't do well with engineering stuff like this because it's so regular and standardised. Natural landscapes are easier in that sense.
>>107112689People with shitty GPUs stuck on SD1.5 are the reason. For me at least that stuff nevers makes it to somewhere I'd see it.So the meta is more about picking out those non-SD1.5 images for which hands aren't any good anymore. They usually have logic flaws though.
>>107112428>Imagine a twitter accountLost me there, chief.
>>107112428>Imagine a twitter account you followed is in fact AII can't imagine I would follow any twitter account
>>107112460>Everything was fake long before AI, but whatever.yeah pretty much this. literally doesn't matter to me if it's some fake ewhore or ai-generated whore. or if it's sameshit anime pic #93459345 or aislop art
>>107112627This.
>>107112707You shouldn’t be telling them everything, otherwise it’ll get fixed… I usually leave out a few things so that I’ll be able to tell in the future>>107112621Are you blind? There’s quite a few things wrong with this gen too, it just has less complexity in the scene than the other poster’s.
>>107112750T R V K E not that SDXL is any better
>>107112466wrong shadows again
Zero chance you'd see this while scroolling and think it's AI
>>107112552Can you gen skinnier version with half the tit size and a dick bulge ?
>>107112866>You shouldn’t be telling them everything, otherwise it’ll get fixed… I usually leave out a few things so that I’ll be able to tell in the futureI'm not anti-AI. I would like if it was a simple as "just spot flaws and tell the AI" to improve these models, but it doesn't work in such a piecemeal way like that. If there was a model which didn't include these flaws, I would be using it.It is possible to mentally exist somewhere that isn't "hate all AI" and "praise all AI".>>107112889I would be suspicious based on the style, then inspect closer and notice things like the asymmetrical cuffs. The right one (her right) follows on the from the sleeve. The left one looks like it's been folded up, but it hasn't made the sleeve any shorter. There's a few minor anatomy flaws too. Also there's no button on the jeans where there should be one.
>>107112466Beyond the stuff a dozen other people have pointed out, the supposedly human character looks fucking weird as hell. Skin looks weird and alien, jeans texture looks weird, and the giant eyeball inset jaw fucked up anime character face. Strange spot to take a picture also...let's stand right where all the trash and broken eggs on the ground is vs where there is no trash literally anywhere else. Also some weird shadows against that solid white metal paneling, which it can't keep consistent since it's mesh paneling on the walkway in the background.
>>107112889Only if you've never interacted with a real human before. If I saw this picture in 2019 I'd immediately think "this is computer generated art".
Here's a simple truth:If you can't tell it's fake in 3 seconds, it's real.Imagine spending more investigating every pics autistically. You tell the pic in the OP is AI simply because it's presenting to you and get all your attention. You will tell it's real if you're only exposed in less than 3 seconds.
>>107112889The piss filter is a dead give away
>>107112966You aren’t concerned in being able to tell whether something/anything is “real” or not? Or just due to nature of these token predictors, do you expect that they’ll never be perfect regardless of corrections?
>>107112995Holy fucking lie, you just proved OPs point completely. The absolute state of noai copefags having an existential NEED to hate an AI image simply because muh “it isn’t reel chuddah!!!”. Meanwhile 10,000 IQ baking kings > “mmmm Bobbahs… “ dikexpansion.png.OP, never forget who the enemy is. Your GPU will always be worth more than this caste of trash that can’t afford an rtx 3060.
>>107113087>you can see its not real immediately due to the basic overall appearance, therefore youre a coping ai haterthe state of mental illness in 2025
>>107113174Nice job conveniently omitting the fact anon said IN 2019. Literally no one would suspect anything in 2019 because that was before fucking sd 1.4. It must really hurt having a pencil buried so deeply inside.
>>107113254>Literally no one would suspect anything in 2019Same person for both posts. Everyone with eyes in 2019 would suspect it because it's got a weird uniform look that screams CGI in a way that's not just an Instagram filter on a real pic. Granted it's very good, very lifelike, but it still has that quality about it that just jumps out. Only little kids and mental cases would think it's real. The 2025 comment is about the state of people in the current year who feel the need to stan AI generated art when it isn't even being attacked in the first place. I'm personally pro-AI, I use it daily in a professional context, and I still think the referenced pic does not look real.
>>107113087>Meanwhile 10,000 IQ baking kings > “mmmm Bobbahs… “ dikexpansion.png.Please, fine tune your 4chan bots on posts scraped from here, not from r/greentexts
>>107112428you'll never meet up in real life so just enjoy what you've got.
>>107112889the plastic skin continues to be an easy giveaway
>>107112428i follow one account to watch how they do it. she had an AI sort of generic asian face but there is good consistency and the background are often good. i think in general it is a combination of real photos and then the character combined into it. or especially in the videos but also some pictures, it might be an actual video with the face changed over it. you can find mistakes though. in instagram carousels of the same setting, the boobs don't change angle when the body moves.i am interested in 3d more than AI so i am trying to do 3d models and take the videos and poses to use.
>>107113605this is one where the street is real, and the carousel has other pics from the real street, but at a glance on your phone it doesn't seem like a combination of a pic and a AI model. but it does at closer inspection.
>>107113605damn manpeople on /vt/ were wondering where Kronii was on her vacationhow'd you get this gallery KEK
>>107113078A few things.Being on imageboards, and being online more generally, we spend a significant amount of time interacting with images rather than reality. Things are already "not real" in that sense, and this is just another layer of abstraction from the real. It's good to remember that.It's partly about the indicators being here for some time to come, but I do think eventually (though I will not predict when) they will be indiscernable.The main reason I don't mind pointing out issues though is practical and like I said: models cannot be improved by pointing out piecemeal flaws like this. Even if they could, don't you think a researcher could just generate some images of his own, and then notice the flaws himself, replicating what I have done? There is no special insight required to notice these flaws, and intelligent people will be the ones who develop the models, not prompters like the person we're replying to. The fact he can't see the flaws but we can is meaningless, because researchers could also see those flaws. There's no point in gating that information.
>>107113605You can generate anything and you make molid chinkoids?
>>107113697seething jeetoid lmao
>>107112889The lighting is too good, a professional photo would look like this but an amateur won't
>>107113410> "Everyone closely inspects every image they scroll by for blender stank particles for at least 20 seconds just how I do!"
>>107113005They could crop the image
>>107113495what was the prompt kek
>>107112466>find a flaw.there is trash on the ground to the left of her.none of the trash makes any sense.it looks like straight out of india.
If it keeps getting worse I'm just going to stop using the internet all together. I'll just read books written before 2022.
>>107112466looks plasticy and low qualityeven a 10 year old shartphone can make photos better than thist. using a 55'' TV
>>107112428>>107112452>muh light source>muh shadow positionhow bout the fact that she's walking on a busy bridge IN HER FUCKING UNDERWEAR and nobody even glances her way.
>>107112428Stop using twitter you inbred swine
>>107112428that's your biggest issue? twitter accounts?how about:- banks- employers- a date- travel destination (hotel)etc.
>>107112466>find a flawher boobs not on my face
>>107114102idk that seems pretty normal these days
>65 + 1 posts>op still hasnt named the model xhe usedfag
>>107114302Any general model can do it dumbass.
>>107114092>looks plasticydamn, AI is getting GOOD
>>107114382>jeets cant tell the difference between sloppa and real imagesgrim
>>107113816>i have to defend the fake pic bro
>>107112428>>107112466lighting is off
AI is the shadow of a shadow of a shadow.
>>107112621fake, drmartens is the only brand that can make shoes with a yellow sew (trademarked) and they don't make shoes with a sole that thick
>>107114259maybe in SoCal or Vegas where people are used to seeing that shit everyday but I also forgot to mention that it appears to be during the cold season judging from the coats and hoodies everyone else is wearing and she seems kinda underdressed.
>>107114102No that is pretty realistic.
>>107114259>>107114568I'd sure love to live where you guys live where cutie hapas just cavort around in skimpy clothes flaunting their good stuff in public.
>>107112452Nobody cares, you gay man. I just see tits.
>>107112621All I want is a woman that looks like this and isn't a massive pain in the ass. Why is it so hard bros?
>>107114884your dream is incompatible with reality.
>>107114612It is not common, but it happens that occasionally a hot girl is dressed like that.And people don't want to be rude so they don't stare (some will try to look without being noticed though)This goes double if there is someone taking pictures nearby, people don't want to be caught staring and then posted online
>>107114452> cant make a reasonable counter to the argument so must try and gaslight the other person into thinking they’re being pettyEpic!
>>107112621The railing is wrong, the supports arebnt evenly spaced, the stairs had weird lines, in case that they are suggesting that is made with tiles. Also, even as a male, I can see that the lipstick is HUGE. Come on man.>>107112889to include flaws, isnt the railing immediately behind her too out of focus? Also the car in the roght, for the estimated distance, is way outta focus.>>107113495For starters weird knees location, also weird hands. the hair doesnt move well given the movements she is doing. maybe im wrong buit the face perpectiove is also wrong.>>107113605>lower rightHUGE HAND, wrong phone positioning>>107113635floor perspective is wrong, also suppose she is 1.70mts, she should be 40 kilos to be that skinny. A dead giveaway are the leg proportions. Hmmm the coat shadows are kinda weird
>>107112428>you cant tell>literally no real folds or wrinkles on shirt>the path has no dirt, grime or damage>literal fucking ceiling florescent lights on the "bridge" railing with zero signs of weathering or rust>literally everything is just too smooth and featureless including the pole
>>107114044the gray tshirt guy's laptopm its on word, then desktop, then a wierd change on light just from a simple rotation, they all run weird>>107114056come on, this one looks super plasticky
>>107112428Yes, we really needed another AI slop Indian thread on top of the 7 generals already on the catalog, you demented fucktard.
>>107115054It's shocking that we don't have an /ai/ board yet. Even V Tumors get their own board. AI is probably the biggest technical advancement and culture shift we will see in our lifetime.
>>107115091Fucking ponyfags got a board before this but mongolian moot doesn't actually seem to know how to make new boards so
>>107112466You could pain Mona Lisa with all that makeup. 5 times.
go on /g/, tell me how you'd know this is AI
>>107114884>all I want is a woman in the top 1% of looks>oh and I have additional demands on her personality
>>107115293ugly ass changetta not using a filter even though the output has a piss filter
>>107114884You really riled up the libs with this one bruv
>>107112428>Imagine a twitter account you followedI don't use twatter. You should go back there.
>>107114419there's still skin on top of that and even with tons of makeup it looks less plasticy than the AI slop pic
>>107112428I can tell slob by just having a glance.
>>107114044why is everyone running into the corner of the room?
>>107115556asian f*males don't post face pics without plastic beauty filters THOUGH
>>107112428>>107112466>>107112621>>107114056>chinks deluded themselves into thinking chinks have white people bodies with chink eyes with contact lenseskek you are so delusional that you make jeets look normal.
>no anon>this is not my step father>he is my boyfriend>u are mad that u cant fuck me lolwhy are yellow roasties like this
>>107112466spaghetti fence on the right
>>107115751There is such a thing as a half white half asian in eastern Russia, you know?
>>107115797a dozen beauty filters over an inch of makeup certainly proves your point
>>107112428>Now how can you be sure all the accounts you followed are not AI?You migrate to the EU, where any entity doing business and employing AI for that kind of purpose has to flat out tell you in plain intelligible language that the thing is a fucking AI fake, or risk a fine based on a percentage of annual worldwide turnover they won't want to swallow.
>>107115854makeup = bad? Sir ...
>>107115797yeah because the average chink is a mutt with white dna and dressed up like a clown, you fucking retard
AI suck at perspectives, its improving but its noticeable>>107115293Agan, perspectiove is crooked, the mouth opf the ginger seems odd, the street lamps too. the hair seems kinda out of focus and with too much loss of detail for just a shitty grain filter. the ginger's back of the neck coloring seems odd, is it hair, is it dirty?I dont know, but should not the other ginger's eye should have light reflections too?>>107115854the eyebrows are too neat while the eyelashes are a mess, seems yanked outta a toothbrush, the pupils have a weird shape / reflections, the eyebrows are misaligned.is it me or they are trying to (over)use filters to hide the AI or the imperfections?
>>107112428>Now how can you be sure all the accounts you followed are not AI?I don't follow any accounts.
>>107116032I don't think this is an AI image buddy. You just exposed yourself as a pseud.
>>107115854lips are too big.
>>107116049>Its a profile image>It must be real you guys>no counter argument other than that
>>107115040>come on, this one looks super plastickyAccurate gen of Korean women then.
>>107115293>how would this photo come to exist?
Imagine using technology this great and still generating ugly yellow bugs.
>>107115854elbows are too pointy
>>107116049Bait or retarded?
>>107116546White girls are desperate for Korean guys, why would lesbians be the exception?
>>107112621what are these legs lmfao
>>107114996>Also, even as a male, I can see that the lipstick is HUGEHow the hell would a man know that? No man except degenerate "femboys" know this
>>107116854>anon admits he's never had a gf
>>107112480kek
doesn't seem fake to me.
>>107117125same prompt but using gpt4
>>107117125>>107117137same prompt but using MAI-Image1st image was DALLE-3
>>107112466The pole lights are doing optical illusions IRL
>>107114971>reddit
>>107116743
>>107112428AI slop always have the same face. If you had played around enough you can even tell what model it was from based on the face.You can check the image resolution too, there are common image resolutions and ratio used for slop image generation.Inconsistent details like the large iron pole, fence and lampposts on >>107112466
>>107115539you are missing out good faps
>>107115054>whine about ai thread more popular than my distro hopping thread
>>107112428>AI is so good that it's literally impossible to tell if it's fake or not. AI is getting better and unless you pay attention it's getting hard to distinguish between a generated image and a real photo/illustration but it's not exaclty impossible, yet.I'm not worried about the present or even the near future. But in about 10 years it's going to be pure madness. Reality will be erased from the internet.
>>107117297>face
>>107112889Zero chance I'd see this and think it's worth looking at to begin with. It's just a generic picture of a Chinese lady. Who would I be following to see images like this to begin with? Even if this was real it would be fake.
>>107116854>How the hell would a man know that? No man except degenerate "femboys" know this>A man cannot know anything about women besides they have tits and pussiesGee my man. When you spend time with IRL people (despite the gender) you get to see what happens behind the public image they want to project. In the case of girls, you see the plethora of beauty products some of them use, lipstick, mascara, and the ever growing etc.>inb4 kek this anons wants to show offeven If I were here to flex, there is another way to get a direct visual references of the size of a lipstick. Go to a store and look for the make up section, and you'll get to see the actual products showcased.>inb4 again, that will make me look weirdonly if you show insecurities. there are a ton of reasonable situations for a man to be in a makeup section. like:>im here to buy a gift>someone send me here on an errand, and i need help>im gay and I want makeupjust to state a few.that doesnt work for you? fuck, just browse amazon, look for lipsticks and in almost every page there most be photos with girls showcasing the products and / or holding one of those lipsticks. You literally have no excuse for not having access to marketing materials, in this day and age.
>>107114884wrong board my man. But if you wanta shallor and barely /g/ related answer: some girls these days are hyper influenced by social media, even some 6/10 girls think they're the hottest shit and only men with the 666 rule deserve them. A sad state of affairs, really.
>>107117297well? what model are >>107112428 and >>107112466 using?
>>107118195I'm not spoonfeeding you, retard. It's very easy to tell
>>107112466WE PICK ONE SPOTOK?A SINGLE SPOT IN THE STREETOK?THATS WHERE THE OLD FORUTNE COOKIES AND SEASHELLS GOOK?DONT PUT THEM ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE STREETOK?
>>107113526>>107112889Nearly all 'realistic' AI has this glossy look to nearly everything. Nothing in real life is that shiny unless you oil it up or get it wet. Even from the thumbnail you can tell that the picture has that glossy AI glow.From the thumb you've also got a possible case of piss filter.Zooming in and the shadows immediately make zero sense. The railing is practically glazed when a real life railing would have a matte finish of some sort. The shadows are fucked, the lighting is inconsistent (how the fuck is the figure so brilliantly lit while everything else is so dark). That's all before you start looking for anatomy and clothing problems. I'll admit to not catching the sleeve cuff that another anon noted in a 5 second pass, but there are other problems too.>>107113635The woman looks badly photoshopped in. Even ignoring issues with the woman herself, the lighting is significantly different and she looks like she's on an entirely separate layer. All the fuzzing around the edges of her outline make it obvious that this is a composite image at an absolute minimum. That's obvious within fractions of a second of expanding the image, and would probably be obvious within the thumbnail itself with a slightly larger one.>>107113410This anon gets it. The people fooled by this shit are braindead. I've seen convincing watercolor type images, but all of the photorealistic stuff is fucking obvious.
SERAFINO MASSONI UNDERSTOOD IT! WE ARE ALL ABOUT TO BE REPLACED BY MACHINES! AND YOU USEFUL, DUMB IDIOTS ARE HERE DISCUSSING WITHOUT REBELLING.
>>107112428I don't use twaatter
>>107113635If this is AI. We're fucking cooked.
do ai retards have some sort of aphasia or something? how the fuck do they look at ai shit and go "yeah this looks just like real life"
>>107112621No way this one is AI
>>107118925stop samefagging
>>107112466>>107112428>chinx think they look like this without filters
>>107113635>vtuber body proportions
>>107112428I've already been assuming everything on the internet is fake and gay for 30 years
>>107112428Uncanny valley as fuck.
>>107117844"reality" isn't in photos and videos on the internet anyhow?most influencers were not reality but beautified. a lot of other shit is corporate or national propaganda "reality" - at best by omission but mostly by astroturfed falsification.
>>107118241i dont accept your concession. fuck you nigger!
>>107112466>Ugly fingers>Lamp posts aren't lined up proper>Fence makes no sense>Bolts anywhere and everywhereAI is good enough to coom but only a dumb jeet could think it's convincing.
>>107112428How can I be sure the talking meat bags in real life are actually conscious? All this hand wringing about not being able to recognize AI is just repackaged solipsism.
>>107112428Simple. Don't use twitter.
>>107117201Not bait. There are like 3x as many girls as guys going to Korea on holiday cause they grew up on kdramas and kpop and want their dream Korean bf. Granted most of them are disappointed that every guy isn't a 6'2 softboi written by fujo coomers, but that's still plenty of AMWF couples.
>>107123810>Granted most of them are-fugly hamplanets
>>107112428>AI is so goodImagine how bad science and math are that for 50 years of CGI they could only produce the uncanny valley garbage with all their rendering techniques, when an AI has zero equations built in
>>107112466Claw hand.
>>107114056the way ai girls look at me gets me right in the feels
>>107126583that looks like a diaper lol
Always cracks me up when I see retards some how act like analyzing a fucking picture 2inchs away from there fucking faces is the same as seeing the images and video in passing from some what of a distance on a shitty ass display running at 30fps . Fuckloads of these "problems" people point out can be easily masked. Even easily masked on peoples shitty phone screens. Most people don't even pay enough attention to pick out these small details when browsing and I bet even newfags like you probably ignore or quickly scan like 80% of what's on 4chan. Clearly none of you nigger shitheads lurk anymore. That being said in a few years or maybe even months most of this can be optimized to fix these issues.
>>107127385>2 more weeks
>>107128141My point isn't really this it's more about retards acting superior over there ability to call any of this out. Gb2/reddit
>>107126583just crop
>>107115293Too bright for the location/setting, tree growing out of a lamp on the left, too many lamps in a weird pattern, the hair on the bangs of the asian melt into her skin, knitting on the ginger's sweater is not a consistent patternIf I was only glancing at it on my phone or I was old with shit eyes, or it was heavily compressed and looked shitter where you can't see the details as well I probably wouldn't be able to tell. AI is getting much better than it was just earlier this year. It's going to be a real bitch when a bunch older folks start getting hoodwinked by AI into believing nonsense. I've already had to tell my dad a bunch of the dumb shit he sees on facebook is AI slop.
