Should we boycott AI art?
>>107115313No saars and latinos can have a bit of fun while it lasts
>>107115313>REEEEEEEEEEEEEE, technology democratized visual communication!
>sophie labelle
>>107115313>pedotroon labelleomg I love AI art now
why are fartists always smelling their own farts?also >not x but ythe hypocrisy
>>107115364Yes this is sovl, the rest is fascism
>Sophie LabelleNot sure the tranny that outright champions 5 year old transitioning procedures should really have a say in any of this.
>>107115313Political cartoons are the very very very shallow end of the art world.
well it's jarring soulless shit
>>107115313they were against plutocratic machinery being used against the people. they simply wanted to build a singular coherent super-organism from a nation.
>>107115313we should boycott artists
>>107115313>Can't draw for shit>Seething that the computer can draw a billion times betterMany such cases. And it's always the talentless, crayon eating deviant art retards who cry about this shit.
>“Printed books will never equal written ones, since the copyist’s writing can be the faithful witness of the contents of the book, whereas printing is merely a mechanical operation.”Faggots throughout time have thought this way.
Boycott non-AI art. Graphics cards use a fraction of the energy it takes a legacy artist to draw a picture.
>>107115465>>107115570stop posting your trash
>>107115602Coal miners weren't happy about losing their jobs either. We've all got to make sacrifices for the environment.
>>107115637If only they did, we're mining more coal than at any other point in history. Coal mining has only increased.
A legacy artist literally couldn't draw this because it doesn't exist in the real world. AI art will open up a universe of possibilities.
>>107115602
>>107115652Aware
>>107115313>boycott a tool that has no willthis place gets retardeder every day
>>107115937>boycott a tool that has no willYou're right, we should boycott OP
>>107115955evidently not
>>107115313Most of the artists are for sale.They always were.Artistry being a good to be traded on the market is as old as the art itself.What AI art will do, is to make someone like Ben Garrison jobless.
>>107115955he was referring to AI you fucking retard
>>107115313>It's the closest that OLIGARCHS can get to artists' POWER to create UNIVERSES out of THIN AIR.Or...they could just pay an illustrator to do it for them? Paid illustrators are pretty much the prostitutes of art, after all.
>>107115313What even is fascism to these people? It seems to be a generic, undefined, amorphous evil energy or something.
>>107115313Artists and journalists have always been the tools of the ruling class to control the masses. Nowadays they love the blame "Nationalism" for riling up the masses for World War 1, but who actually did the riling up? Journalists and political cartoonists who were paid to spread harmful, dehumanizing political propaganda.
>>107116256the extent to which these people care about politics is that they can put things up their butt, take drugs and get access to children. Then presiding above them are the capitalists who want to import as much cheap labor as possible so as to decrease wages and increase rent and real-estate prices."Fascists" to them are people who interfere with or disapprove of these things in any way.
>>107115313This is a really dumb take, just stepping over the non sequiturs or the idea that art has anything to do with getting to the truth, when fascists take over the artists happily work for them and they control art just as easily as anything else. Hugo Boss nazi uniforms are probably the most famous example. But it's not just fascism. When the church was in charge, all the painters, sculptors, architects, musicians worked for the church. Nobody is special, nobody is moral. Doctor? Scientist? You're experimenting on POWs and making weapons.
