>Just use rust goy>oy vey using python? alright fine but you have to use uv now to (((manage))) it
>>107168629I'm not gay I don't care about rust
>>107168629I'm not brown I don't care about python
I'm not a gay brown so I don't care about either
>>107168629>you have to use uv nowwhy are so many people against uv without actually having any real criticisms of it? the state of python package management is actually grim. any efforts to improve it are welcome in my books
>>107168629Based OP is based.
>>107169770>any efforts to improve it are welcome in my booksI would agree generally speaking but with one exception : the (((r*stroon language))) used to implement it. Just another kike trick to move python users into their glownigger honeypot, as OP implies.
>>107170642>the (((r*stroon language))) used to implement it. Just another kike trick to move python users into their glownigger honeypotYou are mentholly sick.
>>107170664Heh, not at all. My faculties are just fine in fact. If I have a fault in this, I'm simply too much of a nooticer for many """people's""" comfort. I'm A-OK with that desu.
>>107169770op is a zoggie pretending to be against (((them))), or someone who fell for (((their))) tactics.there is a move by (((some people))) afraid of safe software (generally safe by being more correct, not just memory safe) in the hands of the masses.so in typical zog fashion, they are trying to develop this "anti-rustism" as some sort of a cultural identity trait, i.e. make it a part of the personality of people who want to feel smart (read, actual retards), and manufacture a fake connection with the mutt-tard culture war to help guiding those "very smart" people into the "right direction".this is why a lot of "anti-rust" posting reads like a hasbara bot (or any paid for pol campaign), filled with every-accusation-is-and-admission style complaints about how rust adoption is or feels "inorganic", and regurgitates the same talking points over and over, points that wouldn't pass for anyone who has above low-mid intelligence, at the basic logical level, a person doesn't need any technical knowledge to detect the retardation and poor attempts at manipulating truths in these talking points.
>>107170768It's not the language faggot, it's the (((community + their overseers))). (Well the language itself is awful too, but that's beside the main point.)I'll stick with C++ & C thanks. There are plenty of ways to avoid gotchas with a minor bit of education under your belt. Also, protip:>r*stroonlang isn't safe
>>107170786>"stick it to (((them)))...... by using (((ISO))) langs">commooonity bad OKAY>zero (correct) technical knowledge<case in point
>>107168629I don't use either
>>107168629criticising rust is fine. praising python is not.
what exactly is uv and what exactly is its usecase?
>>107170826Yes, use ISO langs. Far better that than (((commercial))), honeypots. Are you so ill-educated you don't remember the debacle of Mozilla's downfall and exactly how it happened. Skill issue.>>107171019Both correct. But I don't think OP was actually praising Python AFAICT, just pointing out the glownigger effort to entrap that community in their rustroon honeypot as well?
>>107171042>>107168629and why is it kiked? honest question
>>107171054<another case in point:1. made up "facts":>it's "commercial". ISO and its langs are not "commercial".2. scaremongering/conspiracies with zero evidence:>honeypots3. every accusation is an admission:>Are you so ill-educated>the glownigger effort to entrap4. unsubstantiated/vague reference to own version of events that are not even relevant, and treating it as a single source of truth:>you don't remember the debacle of Mozilla's downfall and exactly how it happened.5. random regurgitation of expressions, lack of vocabulary:>skill issue
>>107169770If you want others to use a specific software, you have to provide arguments in favor of it.You want them to change. You are the one who has to appeal to them.They don't have to explain to you why they don't do it.What improvements does uv offer? It can do nothing that isn't already done. It is not faster. It is not better. Python is already memory safe as well. So what is the point?Tell me: Why should i use your software?
>>107171278Ehh, the simple fact is an ISO language is an international treaty. Participating nations are signatories to that treaty. They each, individually, have massive amounts of infrastructure code built in C, C++, & Ada. They are not willing to allow any other nation regardless of (((motivations))) destroy those languages. They themselves will fight tooth & nail to protect them to remain functional, efficient, and effective.NOT SO TROON LANGS! :DKikes can kill/corrupt/embed_surveillance/whatever at will bc (((reasons))). Simple as.
>>107171352>It is not fasterYou're trying too hard.
>>107171445>ISO langs are good because they are an (((international treaty)))keknow do the implementations of said "treaty" languages
>>107171042>>107171112In short: It's pip but faster. Long: It's a python package manager written in rust which also bundles project management and virtualization. It's completely free and licenced under MIT, so your opinion on being kiked may vary.
>>107171489Sure, each compiler vendor has to do the right thing, and just like everywhere else in tech they are also under attack by these self-same kikes. OTOH, having lots of options always increases the likelihood of quality for us (though I'm sure it puts a burr up your (((asses))) ). :DWhat? I suppose you'll say now we all need to fall in line and be good little goyims, using only the (((officially-provided))) troonlang du jour FOTM? Nigger please.
>>107171540Please explain how the free version everyone can use is kiked, but the closed, uninspectable version, one may have to pay for, is not?
>>107171540>having lots of optionsgreat. now enumerate them.
>>107168629>rust compiler is vulnerable to bootstrapping compiler viruses>constant pushing to rewrite all of our infrastructure in rust>the US government urges you to use itOoh it all makes sense now
>>107168629Even ignoring all the schizo parts it's pretty concerning that uv was created by a private company who'll just probably gonna do some rugpull in the future
>>107173702>zogduke tard pretending to be anti (((US government)))new cognitive dissonance level unlocked
>>107173735If it turns shit then fork it. It's MIT after all.
>>107168629>>107170260(((Windows 7 the LGBT OS)))>(((proprietary)))>(((first Windows to have over 700 trans sexual devs and 10k LGBT devs in the project)))>(((LGBT)))>(((spyware)))>(((over 30 thousand new CVEs every month until updates were stopped and now list expands over 120 thousand new CVEs every month but nobody fixes those anymore)))>(((multiple new zero days per year, never fixed)))>(((no games)))>(((stockholm syndrome)))>(((Windows 7 Home Basic was specifically designed for India)))>(((non-free)))>(((cuck license)))>(((tinkering with terminal, cmd, powershell, regedit, group policy, task manager, device manager, scripts, debloat apps, russian malware, antivirus, broken updates)))>(((no software support)))>(((low iq)))>(((worse LGBT woke DEI code of conduct than Linux/FreeBSD has)))>(((Windows 7 was first DEI Windows that used black people in advertisements)))>(((first Windows including ads in the menus)))>(((no drivers)))>(((baby duck)))((( https://unlocked.microsoft.com/pride/ )))
>>107170768Shut the fuck up moshe, we know rustrannies are your own conop because your lame.
>>107174195>>107174305former uv contributor. we were told to make it slower than pip for projects over 10k LOC unless telemetry enabled. rust rewrite was cover for payload. left when they wanted me to add feature scanning docstrings for wrongthink. it's all in commit history if you know where to look.
>>107175953>if you know where to lookgibs hints plox
>>107170364>>107175953cool stories. can you share your prompt?
>>107169770The language should be batteries included instead of having a package manager.
>>107176911>can you share your prompt?it's called having a frontal lobe and reading the thread before posting, you vaxdamaged troglodyte. go back.
If you want others to stop using a specific software, you have to provide arguments in favor of it.You want them to change. You are the one who has to appeal to them.They don't have to explain to you why they do it.
>>107175953I know where to look, the commit hashes you are definitely going to provide in a reply to this post instead going silent and ignoring it like the larper you are
>>107180239real nooticers dont spoonfeed. diff the bytecode between releases yourself or keep screeching. not getting raided for a larper.now stop samefagging this thread.
