[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: comfylab.jpg (88 KB, 1200x675)
88 KB
88 KB JPG
I'm starting a project IRL and I'd like your input.

Free and open social media. By open I mean seriously fucking open. Not only is the source code open, but people can actually visit the headquarters, see the server room, talk with the developers and hang out. It's not a company, but a hobby group. An open lab. A community of people who want to give the Internet BACK to the people. It's insane that the Internet, which by default is a people thing, is owned by billionaires and we have ZERO SAY in its content. Zero say.
So the next time you crinkle your nose and say you dont like some arbitrary thing about my web page, just get your ass over here and change border-radius:12px to 0px then.
>>
>>107237772
>but people can actually visit the headquarters, see the server room
Imagine the police raids.
>>
Try not posting your retarded ideas right after doing whippets OP
>>
>>107237962
The idea is based.
>>
>>107237772
>visit the headquarters, see the server room, talk with the developers
OP this literally makes Joan make mustard gas
>>
It was a joke obviously open access is necessary to recalibrate your quantum narrative
>>
The Internet unironically belongs to the people and not to corporations

It's laughable that we're just powerless end users and have to accept whatever They do to the sites we use
>accept cookies or pay
<okay...
>>
>>107237772
So how do you intend to comply to any laws with this, provided no company feels like standing in your way?
>>
>>107244694
What laws would it have to comply with? A non-profit FOSS site doesnt collect or process any data from the users because it doesn't have to.
The biggest problem I see is people posting copyrighted material on there, which is what everyone does everywhere. People rarely post OC.
>>
>>107237772
>Free and open social media. By open I mean seriously fucking open. Not only is the source code open
Make a fediverse instance
>>
>>107244707
>What laws would it have to comply with?
Copyright bs as you mentioned, "hateful speech" garbage, and the mandatory surveillance state cancer laws they're currently developing which inevitably force you to collect data anyways. And this is isn't even mentioning the amount manufactured malice and misuse you'll get from it if a company does notice you and if you do succeed they sure fucking will.
>>
>>107244728
I'm a Linux programmer and I struggle to understand how to use Mastodon, Fediverse and Matrix.
From this I gathered that if I struggle to use them, they will never gain traction.
>>
>>107237772
So you want a WEF propaganda platform where you can censor anyone who disagrees with your death cult propaganda
>>
>>107244971
Why do you always lie about my ideas so you can get them cancelled right at the start?
It's weird. What's your agenda?
Whenever I make FOSS, people kill it right off the bat. But if I make some crap like a commercial file upload service, you give me the thumbs up.
>>
>>107237772
pull request rejected because you are not part of my discord circlejerk
>>
>>107245182
I hate discord so much. Discord and Reddit ruined the Internet because every niche community now resides under their roof
>>
>>107244903
If they gain traction, they will be poisoned feds. This "everybody pitches in for unicorns and rainbows" shit doesn't ever work anywhere. Open systems can't survive mass appeal because most people are too stupid to have a custodial relationship with an abstract concept.
>>
>>107245752
poisoned by the feds*
>>
>>107245027
FOSS social media would only ever appeal to people that are on open platforms that are better than your retard slop, and they probably do so because they're degenerate criminals who would not otherwise get away with their crimes or be capable of finding conspirators.
>>
>>107245806
>FOSS social media would only ever appeal to people that are on open platforms that are better than your retard slop
So only one FOSS site is allowed to exist? (aka the elusive "best site") Sounds like centralization to me.

>they probably do so because they're degenerate criminals who would not otherwise get away with their crimes or be capable of finding conspirators
I dunno man your first argument was ok but this... So you're a pedo if you don't want to pay for social media and watch ads? I just don't want to become a product of capitalism and watch ads if I post text online.
>>
>>107237772
>...but if you say the heckin n-worderino then you're a nazi and you get doxxed banned canceled
this is how every open social shit ends
>>
>>107237772
Mastodon tried doing this, you'll be less relevant than them
>>
>>107237772
social media was doomed from the start. you cannot socialise over the internet
>>
>>107246286
>Mastodon tried doing this, you'll be less relevant than them

Mastodont didnt get off the ground because it's difficult to understand and use
It's not a social media site, it's a complex system and its parts are hosted by the users.
Normies will never adopt something that isn't simple to understand, or requires effort on their part. I mean, do you use it yourself? We're /g/ Linux fags and even we dont use Mastodon. Nobody does.

My site is just a super simple social media site without capitalism. You just open the site, read posts, make posts. That's it.
I think that's how it should be done. Matrix, Fediverse, Mastodont etc are overthinking things. I thought about this for years, this isnt something I say lightly.
>>
>>107246491
>social media itself is a flawed concept

This could also be true.
I might be trying to rationalize something that is irrational at the core.
I often think about this. Making an actually smart social media site could be like making a Christian night club. It's just a paradox in itself.
>>
>>107247829
federated sites are supposedly more censorship resistant as they remove the single point of failure a regular site has, obviously in reality that falls apart as the people operating them are some of the most censorious on the internet
>>
>>107248016
This is what usually happens:
>people dont like the hubs / channels they're on
>they make their own
>everyone has their own private space with 1 user



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.