Bought the xreal one recently and while its far from perfect, its pretty wild techwise. I was in a waiting room and loaded up a porn vid just for kicks and there I was on a huge-ass screen watching a jav and no one could tell. Hopefully a 4k version isnt too far off.
>>107242603we've been using these for 3 years already bro
>>107242612I've never once seen these kinds of display glasses discussed on /g/
They're glasses with near-macbook pixel resolution when they're projected into your eyes. Of course they're pretty good
>>107242775>near-macbook pixel resolution when they're projected into your eyesisnt it only 1080p
>>107243367Yes but to compare glasses, TV and laptop screen you have to look at pixels per degree (PPD)
>>107242603Do they do augmented reality or is it just a giant screen?
>>107243388The latter
>>107242775>>107243386They're worse than using a 24 inch 1080p monitor.
Are you fitting a 24 inch monitor into your pocket though
>>107243433I'd need to fold my dick in half to get 24 inches
imagine the data mining, this is barely one step removed from having a chip in your brain.
>>107243490it's literally just a monitor in glasses you fucking retard
>>107242603Seek help. Porn has ruined your brain
>>107242603>completely irradiates your eyes
>>107244356Yes that's how eyes work, they detect visible light (radiation)
>>107244393Yeah, I’m waiting for a pair that floods your eyes with x-rays. Visible light is pussy shit
Will it take long for these to get cheaper do you think? Say half the price of today?
>>107242603uh are those the nose rests on tiny sticks what the actual fuck am I looking at? why would you not make them like sunglasses this shit looks fragile and stupid the longer I look at it
>>107245490Never
>>107242603i actually want a pair to do work with, just in case this isn't a joke. i need to try them to see how shitty it is. i can't read small terminal text in quest 2 resolution
>>107248766It can do productivity but its not great at it. Text is shimmery if you arent blowing up the image.
>>107242603i have nreal ones and theyre shit for porn just use a normal headset theyre x10 times better
>>107251228damn well im still waiting for the wearable second monitor replacement technology. low resolution might be okay for watching movies but i want to read and do work or its not worth it
>>107242775the resolution is only 1080p, and the pixels are very noticeable circular dotscontrast is still pretty great though because uOLED
>>107243490its a dumb display mirroring device, that's it
>>107242603if these were good major companies would be making them and everyone would want them, yet they are extremely niche and nobody has heard of xreal. i want to put on a pair of glasses and stream my phone to it and its at least like looking at a pc monitor with the same resolution. until then it sucks
>>107253114>>107253898>>107251228babble from anons with no ideaThe meta quest 3 has a pixel per degree of 25The nreal one has a PPD of 44.65The nreal air has a PPD of 49A macbook has a PPD of 60. The glasses are closer to macbook than a quest 3The air are almost double the clarity of the quest when reading the same text. Its hard to see the pixels
>>107254319>babble from anons with no ideai own the xreal one pro you retardi know what it looks like
>>107254331nreal one pro PPD of 42The original nreal air have 49.You bought an inferior product
>>107254354do you realize you might not be able to read or are you making this mistake on purpose?>xreal air 2 ultra: 1080p 120hz SONY panel>xreal one pro: 1080p 120hz SONY panelhttps://vr-compare.com/compare?h1=jtG3rIKIH&h2=3uOUBJ6hxthey're just projected differently across fov depending on settings used, its the same resolution but higher refresh rate and brightness than the older nreal (different fucking company)
>>107253118Does it require any special driver or other software installed on the phone, do you know?
>>107254401no, you just plug in a usb-c cable and hope the mirror hook-up with android behaves, if not you replug it
