>beams infrared directly into your eyes while transmitting radiation an inch away from your brainWow thank you valve!
>>107254490>muh infra-redso, like, non-relevant amounts of heatyou know the visible light band is way more energetic than that, yeah?
*sniff* *sniff*I SMELL PUSSY (is that OP?)I SMELL PUSSY (yes it's OP)I SMELL PUSSY (malding again)I SMELL PUSSY (he's got no friends)THAT NIGGA IS PUSSY
>>107254505Look straight into an infrared laser and tell me how it goes
>>107254542look into a normal laser and tell me how it looks the same as normal intensity of light in your room. Some micro-dicklet sensor is going to be even less than that. Less than the on LED in a chink toy car. Less than a firefly's asshole. Less than the reflection of your shartphone bounced back from the wall behind you.
>>107254490>low power infrared>wifi antennas are on the outside and shielded thanks to the lcd screens and boardWow, it's nothing.
>>107254542iPhones have been shining a ton of infrared into people's faces and eyes ever since FaceID became a thing.
>>107254490You're welcome!
>>107254490op its infrared-you- give off infrared. literally.you'd take more eye damage from being out in the snow on a sunny day
>>107254490Any incandescent light or you know the sun produces several magnitudes more infrared than the ir led used for eye tracking.>radiationget out
>>107254490the infrared is low powerthe radios are a problem, but I'll just disable those and use it standalone only
>>107255510How are you able to understand that the infrared is harmless but not that the radio waves are also harmless?
>>107255510I thought it only supported wireless connection?
>>107254542it went fine because it's INFRA RED LIGHT ON A CONSOOOMER TOY RETARD
>>107254523I read this like it was the lyrics to a musical number with a nice slap bass to it
>>107255550It has steamos too
>>107254970>>107255559>I smoked a cigarette one time and I'm fine therefore cigarettes are harmless! Huge difference between looking into an iPhone infrared light for a few seconds to unlock it and having an infrared light shining straight into your eye millimeters away from it for hours each day
It's just an LED at the end of the day.you can tell how bright(it isn't that bright) it is by what lit up eyes look like in the IR cam videos.
>>107255550for streaming/online and using steam, you'll need wirelessthough maybe you can just plug in a usb ethernet adapter in the back and get internet that way, but it only does usb2 speeds...I'd rather play offline in standalone, or wired through displayport but valve took that feature away>>107255544radio waves emitted right next to your most sensitive organs are not harmlesshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u81xbdeqviA
>>107255725>Watch my 22 minute literal who SNCA video! No thank you Use your own words to explain why it's not harmless
>>107255747ignore at your own risk, I won't be on the brain tumor stats because I simply will not use data intensive wifi right next to my brain for hours :)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCYI may not be able to avoid bluetooth communications with the controllers, but that will be lower power, not data intensive and it's the headset listening for controller activity rather than the other way
>>107255711>It's just an LED at the end of the day.It's a wireless only VR headset, way more than just an LED
>>107255768Look at the videos with the transparent models.The antennas are on the front/outside of the headset
>>107255690they won't need to illuminate your eyes that much to determine the orientation, it should be negligible and fairly low power, it shouldn't dry your eyeballs out, though I hope people actually do measure how much IR it makesmuch better than the other eye tracking solutions people propose like laser tracking, no lasers are ever going near my eyeballs
>>107255765Good to know you can't actually summarize any thought in these because you have no idea what you're talking about and all you can do is post videos nobody will watch >Brain tumor stats Of course, 2 more weeks until we see that massive surge in brain cancer. People have had Wi-Fi routers and cell phones for like 30 years at this point, but any day now it's gonna come, surely
>>107254490>afraid of non ionizing radiation from his bing bing wahooGo outside and enjoy the ultraviolet radiation and xrays of the sun.
Oh look, this thread, again. Already citing quacks and retards again, too. >>107255833Brain cancer rates have been on a steady decline for the last 3 decades. Radio waves decrease brain cancer risk: confirmed
>>107255833>People have had Wi-Fi routers and cell phones for like 30 years at this pointdo people strap wifi routers to their heads for hours?heavy cell phone users do have elevated brain tumor ratesthe safety guidelines were made assuming people only made 1 phone call for 10mins per dayhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2569116/who are you gonna trust? the telecomms industry or doctors?
>>107255853>ultraviolet radiation and xrays of the sun.we evolved to cope with this naturallywe did not evolve to cope with this artificial craphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKeSGmp4F4cit's killing your spermshttps://apnews.com/article/cda2cd76ea904ec5a5791d05bcb7ce50
>>107255897guess it's safe n effectiveyou better get 10 phones and keep them on all the time, get all your boosters too lol>steady declinewhat a load of crap, they're skyrocketinghttps://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20180709-glioma-increase-paper.asp
>>107255510>the radios are a problem, but I'll just disable those and use it standalone onlyWith wired controllers? Lmao. I mean it does have a usb 2.0 port
>>107255980I'm definitely not gonna trust some sourceless article with 0 research from 2008 lmao
>>107255673>>107255725>it has steam OS tooOh yeah, I meant for connecting it a more powerful gaming PC and playing that way. It just seems really weird that they wouldn't let you use USB or whatever the Quest and things like that are using
>>107256008Actually I think we both have this one.>While incidence of brain and other CNS tumors increased overall and among non-malignant tumors only, there was a significant decrease in malignant tumors overall from 2004–2017. Non-malignant brain tumors only had significant increases in incidence from 2004–2008 and from 2008-2018.So an increase in non-malignant brain tumors but a general trending decrease in malignant CNS cancer. I'm not going to pretend that non-malignant tumors are fine, so I gotta give that one to you.
>>107256020im not worried about low bandwidth bluetooth, I'll leave that onwifi is going off though and I don't need their fancy 6ghz wireless reciever>>107256074mobile phones today don't transmit with as much power as they used to in the 90s, but there's still a risk, and wifi frequencies are 2.4ghz which is what microwaves use to vibrate water molecules, and humans are mostly water...it won't be enough to cook you like a roast chicken, but it's not entirely harmlessit disrupts cellular processes>>107256053it's cause they cheapened out on the back usbc port so it only does usb2.0if they left a usbc 3.2 port with displayport, there's no issue
>>107256008>Medical technology improves >Said medical technology makes diagnosing easier >Reports for certain diagnoses increases Whoa
>>107256074they don't seem to be going down in auhttps://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia/contents/cancer-data-commentaries/brain-cancer-rate-changes-over-time
>>107255790those frequencies still pass through your head, I don't buy that they will harm you but just saying
>>107256148a deadly brain tumor is not something that is missed easily...mri has existed for decades
>>107256142Why is bluetooth safe but 6G is dangerous? Do you think nature would give a shit if humans considered the data link slow or fast by some arbitrary human standard in current year?
>>107256182what effect does 2.4 and 6ghz pulsed microwaves have on cells?do you think you'll get more of those pulses if you're transfering HD video wirelessly or just recieving button presses?
>>107256008>>107256153>bongs>roosI only care about the cancer rates in humans.
>>107255690you are genuinely as much of a retarded nigger as boomers why cried about 5G. you just see something new and start fucking screeching like the uneducated midwit that you are
>>107256074apparantely 150 more brain tumors per year over 30 years is no evidence for increased tumor incidence in sweden...https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/39/2/791maybe when adjusted for population growth...what if you could ask every brain tumor patient what technologies they used and howwhat if they all were heavy cellphone users? or slept next to wifi router?do they ever ask such things?no, so you'll think these technologies are harmless
>>107256173Do you actually think MRI technology in the 70s is the same as MRI technology now? Do you think a civil war era surgeon is the same as a surgeon today? MRI is actually a great example of how improvements in that specific tech have made diagnoses easier. MRIs are faster, cheaper, and produce a much more clearer image than ever. A deadly brain tumor is also absolutely something that can be missed, especially with older technology. If you think "danger equal big" then you just have no idea what you're talking about. A benign tumor can be big as fuck, while a life-threatening tumor can be tiny, especially if we're talking about the brain.
>>107255991>we evolved to cope with this naturallyyou're a fucking spastic
>>107256271lmao you think your sky daddy made you 6000 years ago?
>>107256269>A benign tumor can be big as fuckit'll still show up in a scan and be counted in statsyou're still beating around the bush, what causes the tumors?
>>107254490>beams infraredAs long as it's not ultraviolet, what's the fucking problem?
>>107256210>what effect does 2.4 and 6ghz pulsed microwaves have on cells?yeah, what effect does 2.4 and 6ghz pulsed microwaves have on cells? We should learn that.>do you thinkSee this is your problem. Rather than seeking out the information from the global instant information system, you sit here and intuit it based on the small knowledge you already have. This is the definition of midwitism. Somebody that expects thinking to substitute for knowledge acquired from observation and expirements. How would we even know anything about cells to make guesses from them? We could be the top 1% of the population in IQ, and sit here and think for decades and never figure this out because humans aren't a super intelligence that can solve the whole universe from first principles. Compared to someone who just bombarded cells and animals with 6ghz decades ago and you just didn't go read about it. Did you think no one has done that? Sounds like one the most easy and important experiments of all time.>do you think you'll get more of those pulses if you're transfering HD video wirelessly or just recieving button presses?I also question this, I'm not expert on wireless but I think it's constantly sending a wave form even when no data is contained. You can just ask an LLM these questions to your satisfaction instead of talking to me about it. I'm just asking your personal reasoning up to this point.
>>107256254Did you ask them what chemicals they were exposed to? You can't just survey this and assume what it is. We're just surrounded by things that contribute to cancer
>>107256341they should ask things like that to quickly narrow down major negative health culpritsbut the medical system is a clown show that thrives on magical thinking
>>107254490>>107254542Stare directly into the sun and tell me how it goes
>>107256328>Sounds like one the most easy and important experiments of all time.so, where's the data?>but I think it's constantly sending a wave form even when no data is contained. there will be some transmissions like that to maintain the connection, however it won't be chaotic like during data transferhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKeSGmp4F4c
>>107256315>it'll still show up in a scan and be counted in statsThis has nothing to do with I said. I'm saying you're fucking retarded and don't know what they're talking about and you're making that super obvious. >what causes the tumors?Again, the fact that you think there's a single thing that causes brain tumors shows you have no idea what you're talking about. There's a million different factors. Diet, lifestyle, exercise, age, gender. Maybe you mean the biggest cause? That would be age, which is also caused by better medical technology, among other things. Age is by far the biggest risk factor for tumors and brain diseases. Also just so happens that the average life expectancy has been increasing.So if you never want a brain tumor just shun all modern technology and die at 60 to pneumonia or something
>>107256457Why are you asking me? You don't get it. Your method for acquiring scientific knowledge in this situation is to ask 4chan users. That makes no sense whatever. You could ask an LLM right now and you didn't.>there will be some transmissions like that to maintain the connection, however it won't be chaotic like during data transferYou're still trying to intuit it when you have no idea what's going on. I know fuck all but I know a photon is not going to damage a cell or not based on if its doing something "orderly" with other photons determined by what a human thinks is orderly.
>>107256473Have you taken your fauci ouchi recently, it's safe and effective
>>107256328I bet your source is wikipedia jeet
>>107254542Look at anything with light reflecting off of it and tell me how it goes.
>>107256473>the fact that you think there's a single thing that causes brain tumorsnot what I saidyou're letting off microwaves scott free without even examination, you are convinced it's not an issue because "non ionising"I recommend you duct tape a phone next to your balls so you can't breed lolololol
>>107256663wifi doesn't use photonstry again little spermlet
wireless frequencies near the eyes may induce early cataractshttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14628311/howbout it anon? wanna be blind as a senior citizen in your 40s? lol
>>107255725>radio waves emitted right next to your most sensitive organs are not harmlesshahahahahaha faggot>>107256736>you're letting off microwaves scott free without even examination, you are convinced it's not an issue because "non ionising">I recommend you duct tape a phone next to your balls so you can't breed lololololLearn how a microwave oven works then come back.
>>107256762my bad wifions you fucking retard lmao
>>107256785I bet you stuck your head in one lol>>107256809my sperm cells are not weak and mutated like yours because of wifi
>>107254490you use words, but I am still pretty convinced that you have no consciousness, as you don’t seem to understand any of them. Got anything more than mere reflexes? Is there ever a thought in your brain, or is it as empty as your words?
>>107254576>all light has the same intensityAre you fucking retarded?>>107256433>UV from a STAR is the same as infrared from a small device.Absolutely mental.
>>107254490I'm pretty sure I'll die of cardiovascular disease, not this.
>>107255725>>107255833>posts youtube videos as proofDid you know Earth is flat and NASA is hiding this from us? There's no space, Earth is shielded with firmament. Here's my proof: https://youtu.be/WffliCP2dU0You fucking retard
>>107255690Once? Again, iPhones flash infrared into peoples eyes every time they pick up their phones, and every other second while using them.
>>107256169>frequenciesDo you know what you're even talking about?Also, people have done tests, wifi warns the outer layer of your skin by 0.2 degrees. There's shit that warms up your skin even more, like clothes. You don't seem to be worried about that now?
>>107256776Oh my god did you even read any of this? This has nothing to do with "muh radiation". It's the heat that caused the cataracts >The results show that 2450 MHz exposures for >or=30 min at power densities causing extremely high dose rates (>or=150 W/kg) and temperatures (>or=41 degrees C) in or near the lens caused cataracts in the rabbit eye. Ignore the fact that 150 W/kg is nearly 100 times the legal limit for RF devices, they also saw no effect when shining it into the eyes of monkeys, only rabbits developed cataracts. There's 0 mention of radiation. The conclusion is literally "when we beam a high as fuck concentration of heat into the eyes of rabbits they develop cataracts."
>>107255630I read it in the voice of Bustarhymes fr.
>>107256736my dick and balls already have their own cellphones and they're all wearing smartwatches
>>107258546kek
>>107254576Lasers don't work the same as a black body radiation. Even weak lasers can ignite stuff. There's basically no limit on how much they can heat-up stuff, they can go until infinity degrees Kelvin.
>>107254490Were you also complaining about CRTs giving you cancer?
>>107254490Don't forget, its also made out of CHEMICALS1!11!11!1
>think it might be a shitpost>for a split second, think someone might just be posting a funny on 4chan, despite a decade of evidence to the contrary>look inside>it's actual, unironic schizophrenics exposing their lack of factual knowledge>it's full of /pol/ antivax schizos tooAll the more foolish of me to have a single, solitary moment of optimism.
>>107256142>it's cause they cheapened out on the back usbc port so it only does usb2.0 if they left a usbc 3.2 port with displayport, there's no issueIt just makes no sense to me why they would do that. Don't tons of people buy VR headsets for seated experiences where a cord will only be the better option?Personally, I don't trust that there won't be any negative health effects. But even if you aren't worried about that if you just play racing games or space/flight/trucker sims and stuff where you are just going to be seated then you're just losing out at the chance of having a more stable connection with less latency and everything... Just seems like a really retarded thing to not include.
>>107263863There wired headset market is already saturated and with their dongle coupled with foveated streaming this will be the first wireless headset that will come close to wired VR in terms of latency.A wired connection is the least concern about the specs, imo.
>>107264191Saturated with what? I've been wanting a decent budget headset and they only options I feel like I have are the Quest and PSVR both of which have pretty big downsides on PC.If there is something I'm missing I need to be clued in because I need a VR setup.
>>107256736>you're letting off microwaves scott free without even examination, you are convinced it's not an issue because "non ionising"What are they supposed to do? They don't have the energy to heat anything. They can't bump an electron off an atom. They can't damage DNA. No one can prove a negative but why should they when there's no reason to suggest there's any risk. I can't prove there's not some super obscure hard to notice reason infrared heat is bad for you. Why do we have to prove the negative for 5G or 6G but some of you guys don't care about 2.4 or normal radio
>>107257508>frequencies>Do you know what you're even talking about?Yes I do as does anyone with a high school education or anyone who watched an LTT video. Different frequencies have different penetration characteristics, higher frequency is blocked easier. Even retards are required to know this before choosing between 2.4 and 5ghz>Also, people have done tests, wifi warns the outer layer of your skin by 0.2 degrees. There's shit that warms up your skin even more, like clothes. You don't seem to be worried about that now?Infrared warms your skin. 0.2 degrees of heating won't damage you or your cells. You are fractally retarded, you are retarded on every scope and scale.
>>107254490yea the eyetracking and high-bitrate streaming is great the problem is the lack of color passthrough and a screen from half a decade ago.lack of color pass though is especially insulting given it's advertised like pic related. and replacing the tracking cameras with color tracking cameras is 10$ more (the same manufacturer has a drop-in-replacement) and the amount of code rewrite to adapt it is trivial if needed at all.
>>107255711That's a man
