[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: ToNkm.jpg (51 KB, 1012x848)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
There is no reason for any piece of hardware that uses 240W or less to not be powered by USBC
>>
>>107254843

my pc iddle like 65W and supply cord is usually 0.75mm2 or maybe 1mm2
>>
>>107254843
Funny pic.
>>
>>107254843
What is she doing?
>>
>>107254843
USB C is an abomination of a connector barely suited for data transfer, let alone power.
>>
>>107254843
It will depend on the voltage and most things are 5V, mostly because all you need is a cheap/simple BMS for a single battery cell. You can't really pump 100 AMPs of current without them blowing up or the USB wire melting.

240W usb-C is only possible at 60V divided between 12 cells on a high end laptop.
>>
>>107255321
Taking a megabyte.
>>
>>107254843
That's nvidiot thinking right there.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.