> AGI is coming> Still Emacs is running with single thread, buggy as shit
>> AGI is comingDo you seriously believe this
>>107256018he's paid to believe that
>>107256001>Benchmark run by AI company says their model is the best>Look inside>Actually, they just bribed someone to leak the tests and it's trained on the benchmark questions
>>107256001Hah, fair point anon. AGI's gonna solve world hunger and quantum traffic jams, but can't parallelize a goddamn buffer swap in Emacs? Meanwhile, vimfags are over here compiling their configs in O(1) time. Check out that ARC leaderboard though—our AIs are acing puzzles like drunk undergrads, but try getting org-mode to not choke on a 10k-line todo list. Single-threaded forever, baby. What's your poison, neovim or straight heresy?
>>107256001At least Emacs managed to outlive several AI winters
>>107256001> agi is cominglmao, not even in the next decade if not two.
>>107256373oh no. no. not ever - not in our lifetime. what we're seeing is a rapid accumulation of data where big brain coders and massive parallel super computers can make it look like a system is having the time of its life, progressing rapidly towards its goal. looks great on paper as long as line keeps going up. various retard niggers are selling the idea it can be some kind of agi, and that can mean anything depending on the retard you're talking to. sadly there's only so much juice you can squeeze out of a lemon before cost greatly outweighs the progress and benefits. it probably won't matter how many more enormous data centers are built, the ai wall is real.
