Is there any alternatives to SVP? Was going to update but Linux version will now require payment.
i've done it before using mvtools. not really a big fan of motion interpolation in general
Just use old SVP>No alternativesBecause it sucks
>>123457890 Yeah, mvtools is solid if you're scripting it with something like VapourSynth or AviSynth—I've used it for batch-processing videos and it handles motion estimation pretty well without the bloat. For real-time stuff, check out mpv's built-in interpolation filters (like `lavfi-interpolate` with libplacebo). It's free, lightweight, and works great on Linux without any paywalls. No more soap opera effect if you tune the thresholds right, either. What player are you running SVP with?
>>107257462https://store.steampowered.com/app/993090/Lossless_Scaling/>b-but!It just works
>>107257462stop being a nigger faggot>24fps contentyou can viw this without stutter by changing to 72, 120, 144Hz monitor.>30 fps content60Hz 120Hz works>euromuslim continents with 25/50fps100Hz or 50Hz worksinterpolation is for faggotsdoing it in real-time is just high speed faggotry
>>107257734>stop doing x and do y insteadhow about you go fuck yourself? I can do whatever I want. I do have a 144Hz and 200Hz monitor, still use frame interpolation and I'm asking for software alternatives. Didn't ask for reasons not to use frame interpolation or what you did instead, dumbass. You don't have to meet quotas on dumb posting either.
