If techbros unionized 20 years ago, they would have been able to prevent the H-1B visa abuse that allowed 50 million Indian Hindu invaders to permanently leave India, get passports from our countries, and take over and destroy our tech sector:https://www.statista.com/topics/13150/indian-diaspora/Unionizing would not only have prevented replacement by these invaders, it would have forced employers to offer high wages. See the UPS drivers getting $175K salaries, because they are unionized: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ups-drivers-170000-pay-benefits-compensation/Is it too late to unionize NOW and stop further Indian Hindu invasion into our countries and destruction of the tech sector? The problem is that there are already 50 million of them running around with our passports, and they will be immune to any attempt to keep foreign Indian Hindu rats out of human civilization. They have our passports and the jews tell us Ranjeet is exactly as American/British/Australian/Canadian/Japanese as you are, and there's nothing we can do about it (legally). But consider that Modi's Hindu BJP party has been circulating documents where Modi says his goal is to force 250 MILLION single, fighting age Indian Hindu males into western countries, to grab every single white collar job and demand an Indian immigrant be given that job:https://x.com/amandalouise416/status/1929362235048231402Unionizing would prevent further destruction of other sectors for sure, but will it save tech? Let's have a serious discussion /g/oyim
>>107286592Keep pushing the Overton Window until their method of naturalization is seen as illegitimate and there's political will to remove them. We've removed surplus foreign scab labor with citizenship before (e.g. Mexican Repatriation in the 1930s) and we can do it again.
>>107286592>Is it too late to unionize NOW and stop further Indian Hindu invasion into our countries and destruction of the tech sector?probably not because none of them really care about the systems and the country itself.they'll flee
unions are for dirty commies like those uppity Virginian coal miners
>>107286592What exactly stops pro-labor political figures in the USA from simply exploiting basedlennial job rage through say some some "insensitive", according to their neoliberal overlords, comments on immigration? The politicians in my country switch sides from some kind of popular nationalist collectivism to classical liberalism all the time, you strike pollitical capital through saying insensitive things is what I'm saying, what is the endgame, not for the common american cuck citizen vooter, what is their political endgame if they witnessed what populist rage can accomplished and that they're doomed to be ousted?
>>107286691>pro-labor political figureslike who?any actual pro-labor politician gets forced into irrelevancy since they can't attract rich donors
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/521940885
