>>107408789
it's ok, as long as you don't recompress the same file over and over again, which seems to have horrific results with webp. if you run a website, stick to using jpg and png until something that isn't cancer arrives and replaces everything.

>>107408822
>it's ok
no it's not it's fucking garbage fuck you

>>107408836
fuck you too, dumb nigger.

>>107408846
kys

File: 1000000826.png (547 KB, 1488x1488)

547 KB PNG

What is the point of troll threads like these? It gets boring having to post picrel over and over again.

>>107408789
>just werks
>tiny files
>perfect for transparency, animations and pixel art
>lossy and lossless
>supported everywhere but (((4chan))) and (((windows)))
the only thing I'll move to is jpegxl when it's ready and supported everywhere

>>107408867
fuck you and fuck webp
die whore

File: 1000001323.png (1.26 MB, 2160x1911)

1.26 MB PNG

Also this might be nore of a subjective thing but does anyone else prefer how Webp will smooth over images? Like it's bad for photographs where you want to retain as much tree bark detail as possible but IDK, I kinda like it for Anime images desu.

>>107408897
>>107408867
>>107408947
don't care, kill everyone who uses webp

It's not WebP's fault this site doesn't allow uploads.Hiromoot can enable support at anytime.

>>107408960
Bro, he doesn't even allow jpegli usage here, I'm convinced he's straight up retarded desu. Try and upload a jpegli image here, it will be converted into a normal JPG lol.

>>107408960
fuck you

kill webpisstards

>>107408789
Why?

>>107409009
because fuck webp

File: 1000001269.png (1.68 MB, 1024x1024)

1.68 MB PNG

>>107409009
OP has shit for brains. He's not here to have any meaningful tech discussion, just yell "webp is bad because webp is bad, okay!?"

>>107408867
>i save 20kb
but you paid in parts of your soul

File: 1000001302.png (1.74 MB, 1920x1080)

1.74 MB PNG

>>107409185
I have no soul, Gabriel-chan.

>>107409111
ai slop nigger

>>107409320
Nah, that really is what trump looks like in the morning. Thank god we're not in China else this image would be banned.

>>107409345
slop

File: 1747983253778551.png (120 KB, 1873x2006)

120 KB PNG

>mogged by JPEG

>>107408947
>demonstrates the superiority of webp
>is a jpg

>demonstrates the superiority of oled
>is an ad on your lcd tv

>>107409605
????

 Stream #0:0: Video: png, rgb24(pc, gbr/bt709/iec61966-2-1), 2160x1911, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 25 tbn
[STREAM]
index=0
codec_name=png
codec_long_name=PNG (Portable Network Graphics) image
profile=unknown
codec_type=video
codec_tag_string=[0][0][0][0]
codec_tag=0x0000
width=2160
height=1911
coded_width=2160
coded_height=1911
closed_captions=0
film_grain=0
has_b_frames=0
sample_aspect_ratio=N/A
display_aspect_ratio=N/A
pix_fmt=rgb24

>>107409914
kys webp nigger

File: pixDAIZ is here.webm (94 KB, 360x270)

94 KB WEBM

>>107408867
>>107408947

File: good_job.gif (62 KB, 498x357)

62 KB GIF

>>107409522
>uses png
based

File: img-2025-12-02-22-07-03.png (827 KB, 460x1430)

827 KB PNG

the webp experience

>>107410743
hi daiz

>>107410795
it's a good thing that this garbage isn't supported. i will forever curse the mozilla kikes who added support to firefox

>>107408867
>>107408947
Ok, now compare webp to avif for anime images, or jxl for photos

File: 1761572103315.jpg (148 KB, 1042x588)

148 KB JPG

>>107408789

>>107408958
>can't filter

webp, should be supported everywhere by now its such a good format

>>107412446
no it's shit and should be deleted from the universe together with the jeets who made it

>>107410998
MAYBE, give me an hour or so. I might make a thread about it just to make OP eat his shoe.

.gif master race

>>107412624
Has anyone other than Werner Herzog done that?

>>107412624
>muh specs
wring your neck

>>107408789
Fuck webp

File: 1758165387672.png (66 KB, 1258x409)

66 KB PNG

>>107408789
The admin of this site hates webp:
https://x.com/GrapeApe9k/status/1967823045755830547

>>107413780
Mootwo didn't sell the site.

File: 1742678880724268.jpg (59 KB, 984x869)

59 KB JPG

Mark my fucking words

one of the causes for *some* AI generated images looking smudgy or patchy is training with images that at some point were compressed with webp

the in loop deblocking filter that webp uses creates the same shitty plasticky flat smudgy patchy look

>>107414405
you're an idiot

>>107408789
webp is great
isnt jpeg-xl better?

>>107408789
>>107408836
>>107408846
>>107408855
let's calm down, lovely people.

>>107408947
arr rook the same

File: 1756812875771056.jpg (24 KB, 347x344)

24 KB JPG

>filename.jpeg (WEBP Image)

>>107414945
Maybe try viewing this on a computer screen instead of a phone? That said you don't need that much quality for phones, which is what webp seems to excell at vs JPG the most.

>>107414919
yes

>>107414963
>>107414919
webp is shit

>>107414961
Chrome saves it as .webp, so at least you know what it is.
Firefox just pretends it's a .jpeg, so enjoy your upload failing next time you want to post that meme ;^))

>>107408897
>use webp for eons
>app I use adds jpegxl
>oh cool
>try it
>takes eleven billion years to open every file
Garbage.

>>107408789
i agree webp is image aids. we need to inoculate against this virus.

>>107414919
Yes
JXL is the best format in general, and AVIF is the best at lossy anime-style images

>>107417130
Works fine on my machine
You either use shit software or shit hardware, or both

>>107417115
Not him, but I can just quickly change the extension in the file picker if that happens, and 4chan XT will auto convert it to PNG when I'll try to upload it

>>107412624
Still waiting

>>107419741
see

>>107414035
>>107414035
>>107414035
>>107414035

>>107419741
the webp threads, with a positive or negative tone are almost entirely started and bumped by the same person
>>107414035

>>107408822
I use webp's for images I don't recommend people save, like thumbnails and lower quality previews for quick loading. The full-size images are jpg/pngs.

File: take-your-meds.jpg (37 KB, 500x377)

37 KB JPG

>>107408789

>>107408789
Lossless WebP is good if you don’t need wide color and you only hate it because you can’t upload them here

>>107412647
Fuck you and all the webp haters ITT. My image board site converts all uploaded image formats to webp, INCLUDING animated gif's and there's absolutely nothing you can do about it. All non-shit tech supports webp by now and while you could use gifs, or convert them to soundless fucking mp4's, I'd rather use a format that mogs both jpg, png and gif to the moon and back.
>>107412446
B-but what about my shitty iphone from 2018?? Or pirated Photoshop from 2015. Actually, fuck it I'm gonna larp as a win7 user at this point, very fitting thread for it.

>>107422756
>My image board site converts all uploaded image formats to webp
You're only saving storage and bandwidth if you're converting them to lossy WEBPs, in which case you're degrading the quality of every uploaded image like fucking xitter

>>107422848
>only saving storage and bandwidth
I'm also saving the sanity for both myself and others. To be fair, my site also stores the original files just in case a lossless file format is essential to a post, but it's not embedded into any of the pages.

>>107423017
>I'm also saving the sanity for both myself and others
>and others
How is converting uploaded images to WEBP doing that? I can understand if you're allowing users to upload WEBPs to stay under the filesize limit but look better than JPG, but converting a 500 KB JPG to WEBP is just making it look even worse to save a tiny amount of bandwidth like some jew

>>107422695
>and you only hate it because you can’t upload them here
no i hate it because it's a shit format. kys nigger

>>107422848
All of my oxipng-recompressed PNGs are even smaller as lossless WebP files. Usually the WebP is about 60% of the size of the oxipng-recompressed PNG

>>107408789
>webm good
>webp bad
Hmmmmm..

Why

>>107425003
your butthole will be able to fit 60% more dick after i'm done with it

>>107425051
pointless format only created to expand google's control over the web. anyone who says they like it or uses it are paid by google to do so.

>>107425051
it's jeetware

>>107408789
it's already dead

>>107425035
>webm can be posted on 4chan
>webp can't
Really makes you think

File: 1735200390312024.jpg (120 KB, 720x833)

120 KB JPG

>>107425051
>Jewgle format
>pushed everywhere even though it's worse than both AVIF and JXL
AVIF is already supported by both Chrome and Firefox too, so there's literally no reason to use WEBP
Probably the only reason why 4chan doesn't support AVIF and AV1 is because Indian users here don't have phones that can handle these formats

>>107408947
couldn't see a difference on my 168 PPI monitor
but yeah, it does look a bit better on my 109 PPI one

>>107408947
>how Webp will smooth over images
AVIF does that too except it's better

how you can tell an image is lossless or not? to me this is a big issue. I like the format of the image to tell me if the encode may be shit. yeah I know pngs can look like ass if they come form a jpeg. but is not the usual case.

>>107425384
to be fair webm is a literal meme format that only works here.

File: 1750392820984173.png (410 KB, 736x735)

410 KB PNG

>>107425574
>yeah I know pngs can look like ass if they come form a jpeg. but is not the usual case
>not the usual case
lmao, the majority of PNGs I see here come from lossy sources
Here's a png I just saved from another thread

>>107425384
but not with sound on most boards unless you jump through hoops
I got to taste the forbidden fruit of webms with sound during the period 4chan was down and it was quite pleasant

>>107425663
looks lossless to me :)

>>107425602
>to be fair webm is a literal meme format that only works here.
And this is the only place that refuses webp
Pretty funny

>>107425664
There's literally no reason not to enable sound on all boards either. People give the screamer argument, but browsing boards with sound plus altchans with sound support, I know it's bullshit
>but muh filesize limit is too low
Enable AV1 video and Opus audio for WEBMs

webporn?

>>107408789
BASED
>>107425089
As long as Reddit and Wordpress use it, it'll never be dead.

>>107425574
look in the WebP for the string “VP8L” — that means it's losslessly compressed
of course one can losslessly compress a WebP from JPEG input, so that's not a guarantee of anything