so how close are we to telling ai to make a sextape of me and my favourite celebrity? thanks in advance
Aren't there laws against sexually explicit deepfakes without the subject's consent?
>>107460893im assuming people will just mod the ai
>>107460643Several months ago.
>>107462552>>107462564im talking to the level of seemlessness, where it doesnt look like digital fantasy, right now it looks fake, when will it be like 1 to 1 ratio to photo realistic
>>107460893Piracy, prostitution and shoplifting are also illegal
>>107460643How much like yourself would you want it to be? Would you make adjustments to make you look less fedora?
tumor weaks
>>107460893dont care you cant stop memaybe women will finally disconnect from social media en masse avoid being used in ai
>>107460643>so how close are we to telling ai to make a sextape of me and my favourite celebrity?>>107462911>im talking to the level of seemlessness, where it doesnt look like digital fantasy, right now it looks fake, when will it be like 1 to 1 ratio to photo realisticLess than 10 years for something fully immersive, but you'll have something fappable in less than 3 years for sure.
>>107462552just before ram prices went to shit
>>107460643You could do it now, but it would require a month worth of work to do and a high powered computer.
>>107467463ight, how will us normies mod the ai to do it becuase the standard public access shit wont let you, will you have to pay someone or will it be easy to do yourself?
>>107469039so when will it be economical
>>107470665Never unless your broke ass suddenly wants to pay for it
>>107460893Laws only apply if the government finds out.And they normally don't if it doesn't become an issue. If OP self-hosts this model and it's just for him then what's the harm?
>>107460643N
>>107460643I think you can already do that but you need to do it locally. The output will only be 1-2 minutes at most.
