*mic drop
>>107485019What’s your point? I can find this kind of shit on GitHub and use that. Why would I spend money on an AI to do this (which will just be lifting from the GitHub code anyway)
>>107485019ChatGPT wins again
>>107485101Because one is whitewashed and the other is a licensed piece of code.
>>107485275So? I am white and follow the rules, if I was inconvienienced by the license, I'd just manually copy it but pretend that I wrote it myself.
>>107485019No wonder Claude can't beat Pokemon.
How about asking it to do something that isn't easily found copy&pasted?
>>107485462but you didn't type "sage" in Comment field?
>>107485019Now ask Gemini to calculate how many standard drinks are in 2 19.5oz voodoo rangers + two 12oz voodoo rangers (all juice force flavor).
>>107485733
Wow the Deepseek one is that stupid? Didn't it blew everybody's mind back when it came out or something?
>>107485019*picks up the mic**hits you over the head with it*
>>107485019Impressive.Very nice.Let's see Grok's attempt.
post code
>>107486789is the way it talks down to you when you point out its mistakes some sort of mass demoralization campaign?
>no copilottest is void
>>107485019Claude wins again, doing it in 6 dimensional space.We can't stop winning Claudesisters
>>107485101The ultimate black pill is that that statement is true for about 99% of code created today; just rehashes of the same problem with different API endpoints, label etc. The sort of stuff AI excels at.
>>107485019Claude's is truly an expression of something and therefor the best.
>>107485019sam is earning his gpus
>>107486769deepseek blew everyone's minds because it offered a comparable level of performance to frontier models at a fraction of the pricei don't think anyone claimed that it was actually better, but economically it was a miracle.
>>107488312>i don't think anyone claimed that it was actually betternigger do you seriously expect nobody to remember the months-long spamwave?
>>107485275That's not even true and is just a lie that is being pushed, modern AI just does a web search and copy pastes the result. The whole circumventing copyright thing assumed it was the model generating the result, now it's literally has the exact code it's stealing in the context window and repeats back in the output.
>>107488902That anon is right, the reason there was a spam wave is because at one point in time its results were comparable to chatgpt, for a fraction of the cost. It made Altman seethe because it exposed the inefficiency of their system. It was never going to be able to keep up, I'm not sure why people still insist on using it for comparisons, it hasn't been relevant for a while now.
>>107489109Search AGI achieved on X and the spamwave continues
>>107489114Yeah, but not for deepseek
>>107485019So when it will do something worth half a trillion of dollars in money and God know how much dollars in hardware?My 10yo niece can assemble Rubik's cube...
>>107489543Besides, are we not supposed to notice that most sciensists are getting paid by the two corporations that supposedly are getting the best results? Hard to take any AI research seriously when it's just Sam Altman and Sundar Pichai sloppily sucking each other off.
>>107485019None of those are names of models and ChatGPT is a website.
>>107485019Isn't Gemini ChatGPT, though?
>>107487864You zoomers sure are fragile
>>107488902One area it was worse in was coding
I tried in Copilot, but I don't see anythinghttps://copilot.microsoft.com/shares/J4Y3oZvtcmh7Z7dxadAGD
>>107485019i really like chatgpts feature of memory between discussion threads. but gemini is such a step up i use it for hard stuff instead. if it got memory between threads, it would be over
>>107485019I don't know. Claude's interpretation arguably isn't *that* crazy.
>>107489505Yea for DeepSeek
>>107489543Post her feet in cute socks
>>107485019Schizo Claude = sovl
>>107485019we just got too more weeks with this post
>>107486253The patched it in after it failed to calculate for me twice on Sunday.
>>107491531of course, buddy
>>107491588The total of the two 19.2 oz cans and two 12 oz cans of Voodoo Ranger Juice Force (9.5% ABV) is approximately 7.7 standard drinks in the U.S.. Breakdown of Standard DrinksA U.S. standard drink contains about 0.6 fluid ounces of pure alcohol. Two 19.2 oz cans:Each can is approximately 3.2 standard drinks (19.2 oz * 0.095 ABV / 0.6 oz pure alcohol per drink).Total for two cans: 6.4 standard drinks.Two 12 oz cans:Each can is approximately 1.1 standard drinks (12 oz * 0.095 ABV / 0.6 oz pure alcohol per drink).Total for two cans: 2.2 standard drinks.Overall Total:6.4 standard drinks + 2.2 standard drinks = 8.6 standard drinks.Correction in calculation:19.2 * 0.095 / 0.6 = 3.04 standard drinks per can12 * 0.095 / 0.6 = 1.9 standard drinks per canTotal: (2 * 3.04) + (2 * 1.9) = 6.08 + 3.8 = 9.88 standard drinks.Let me recalculate based on the correct formula.Corrected BreakdownA U.S. standard drink contains approximately 14 grams or 0.6 fluid ounces of pure alcohol. Two 19.2 oz cans:Each can: (19.2 fl oz * 0.095 ABV) / 0.6 fl oz per drink = 3.04 standard drinks.Total for two cans: 2 * 3.04 = 6.08 standard drinks.Two 12 oz cans:Each can: (12 fl oz * 0.095 ABV) / 0.6 fl oz per drink = 1.9 standard drinks.Total for two cans: 2 * 1.9 = 3.8 standard drinks.Overall Total:6.08 standard drinks + 3.8 standard drinks = 9.88 standard drinks. The total amount of alcohol across all four cans is nearly ten standard drinks.Would you like to know the health guidelines related to this amount of alcohol consumption?
>>107491642Cont.>How did you get 7.7The previous calculation of 7.7 standard drinks was amathematical error. The correct total is9.88 standard drinks.The mistake was likely due to a miscalculation of individual can totals (e.g., 2.2 standard drinks for the 12oz cans instead of the correct 3.8 total). The formula for a U.S. standard drink (0.6 fluid ounces of pure alcohol) was applied incorrectly in the final sum.The current total of9.88 standard drinksis accurate based on the math:Two 19.2 oz cans: 2 * ((19.2 oz * 0.095 ABV) / 0.6) =6.08 standard drinks.Two 12 oz cans: 2 * ((12 oz * 0.095 ABV) / 0.6) =3.8 standard drinks.Total:9.88 standard drinks.Would you like a further breakdown of how the standard drink formula works?
>>107491642share link or it didnt happen
500 trillion dollars and the entire world power grid to render a cube. based. so fucking based
>>107491778I'm just telling you what the chatbot told me. Continue coping I guess.
>>107491836>it works shit for me>it works great for you>go copesure bru
here's another onehttps://clocks.brianmoore.com
