With Qualcomm entering the CPU market thanks for Microsoft, is it over for x86 bros? Feels like we are living in the ARM century.
>>107489157I'm staying on x86 until I can get an ARM device running bazzite or at least steamOS with 0 software compatibility issues.
>>107489189Never thought about Linux on ARM, is it possible?
>>107489314Yes. Most mainstream distros have ARM versions.
>>107489414Nothing is actually RISC.RISC died with the original IBM POWER systems.ARM has more instructions than amd64 for christ’s sakes
>>107489157Ok, am I stupid or are the ARM shills retarded? We are seeing a massive competency crisis in the IT fields, as most large software companies are being filled with Jeets who are unable to program, optimize and bugfix to save their lives. X86 is viable to a large part because we can move or less brute force the unoptimized software with higher clock speed, more cache, more power consumption. Meanwhile ARM is the opposite - more cores, but way lower clocks, more energy efficient, can technically achieve the same multicore performance at a lower power consumption, BUT the issue is that the software needs to be able to utilize all cores efficiently. Meaning in a FAVSTIAN Aryan society where the white man is the one who writes all the code and optimizes it to perfection for multithreaded workload, then ARM could potentially be better in the long run, especially due to the scalability. That being said, in the real world where Ranjeet is the one writing the code X86 will continue to dominate, as it is way better at single core performance and that's what matters these days.Feel free to correct me if I've got something wrong, I really want to understand the topic.
>>107489755you responded to a bot thread like a retard
>>107489755based, fuck armjeets
>>107489781No, I did it mostly to ask a question with the hope of understanding the matter at hand better.
>>107489824nigga its 6amest/3ampst./g/ is mostly US based board according to mods.if you're talking to anyone here its nightowls and bots.
>>107489891Oh well, a fellow EVROPEAN might answer, who knows
>>107489157It will depend if they can significantly outperform Lunar Lake. Which is achieving close to 20 hours of battery life on a ~70Wh battery. ARM CPUs no longer off twice the battery life of x86 CPUs as they did 5 years ago. In fact if x86 improvements like this continue it's genuinely possible we'll see x86 phones again and you'l finally be able to play more than angry birds on your phone soon (ie Grand Theft Auto V).70 Whr divided by 19 hours = ~ 3.7 Whr per hour of useModern cellphone battery configs:5Ah x 3.7v = 18.5 divided by ~ 3.7 Whr per hour of use = 5 hour battery lifeWhich is dogshit, yeah. But holy fucking shit, Grand Theft Auto V on your... CELLPHONEhttps://www.techfinitive.com/reviews/core-ultra-9-288v-review/
>>107489157>qualcomm entering the cpu marketyes, this is their first cpu.
>>107489314are you fucking retarded or is this bait?
ITT Hacker News
>>107489701and you'll like it
