[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1765305768814.png (161 KB, 1076x404)
161 KB
161 KB PNG
AMD Ryzen 5 7600x or Intel i5 14400F?
Discuss.
>>
>>107494074
the cache?
>>
>>107494074
Either one is fine, the intel has better integrated graphics. Seriously, don't buy F skus.
>>
>>107494074
14400F is better in the current market because it supports DDR4
>>
>>107494074
is that the site where a i3 8100 was 3% better than a ryzen threadripper?
>>
File: 1758296293193460.png (305 KB, 900x980)
305 KB
305 KB PNG
>>107494074
>14th gen
Hell naw.
>>
>>107494212
reddit is saying it's great though ...
https://old.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/1dzuwt6/is_core_i514400f_good/
>>
>>107494074
The thing from the image is, 4.7GHz on Ryzen is HUGE for single threaded programs, but it only has 6 cores, so I have no idea how well it will run on multi threaded programs.
Intel has 2.5GHz base speed so that is almost twice as slow for single threaded programs, but it does have a "boost mode" (which I don't know what it is) that can make it go over 4GHz.
>>
>>107494212
The 14400 doesn't have that high of a boost clock, voltage induced electromigration is not an issue
>>
>>107494270
>>107494226
It has same shit-tier build quality with same structural flaws
It just dies slower because it's slower than say i7 or i9 thus a lot cooler on average
>>
File: IMG_20251209_210736.jpg (122 KB, 959x956)
122 KB
122 KB JPG
>>107494239
if only there were websites that easily allow you to compare the performance of various processors
>>
>>107494306
There were no structural flaws, they just shoved too much voltage into the already fragile 10nm process. 10nm chips were meant to come out in 2017 btw, they had to ship skylake+++++ instead and ruined their reputation
>>
>>107494212
14th gen never had any oxidation issues
>>
>>107494374
The parrots don't actually understand what's physically going on in the chip that's causing it to fail. They think oxidation and degradation are the same thing.
>>
>>107494421
degradation was real but that was patched last year
oxidation was only a few 13th gen batches, in early 2023
but yeah you're right why even bother lmao
>>
>>107494439
>>107494421
So do you think that i5 is better?
>>
>>107494474
it's not necessarily the better CPU but it's a no brainer if you already have a kit of DDR4
look at the 12600K as well, or the 14600K if you can get it for a reasonable price
>>
>>107494165
Could be. How much single thread performance are we talking?
>>
>>107494541
Not much, it's a rebadged i5-6500 from 2015. Performs like an i5-4570.
>>
>retards still buying intel after being warned a trillion times that their cpus are defective, more expensive, more energy ineficient, are unstable, have no upgrade path and their fix for degredation was to kill performance by up to 50% so their specs dont mean anything
>>
>>107494512
Eh I just want this final piece to compare between two prebuilt PCs, since I don't have time to build my own.
>Core i5 14400F, RAM 32GB, RTX 5070 12GB VRAM, SSD 1TB M.2
>Ryzen 5 7600X, 32GB, 1TB NVMe SSD, RTX 4060Ti 8GB VRAM
I am selling the GPU in either case because I need 16GB VRAM (I plan to run Stable Diffusion and maybe some text models too). Also the first one with 5070 is more expensive by 300EUR. So it really depends on CPU and how much I can sell 5070 versus 4060 for (but the latter one is much easier to check)
>>
>>107494590
warning: this user has a ryzen 1600 and is seething at superior products
>>107494618
i would get the 7600X then
14400 is a rebadged 12600K, it can be good value but it's not a true 14th gen chip
>>
>>107494541
>muh single thread
yea if we ignore the 24 threads and quadchannel ram and 64 pcie lanes, then the i3 is great.
>>
>>107494666
90% of programs are written in C, Delphi or C++ anyway, and these are all single threaded or have garbage multithreaded implementation
>>
File: IMG_20251209_214425.jpg (203 KB, 987x1553)
203 KB
203 KB JPG
>>107494666
the threadripper has better single thread.
it's an artifact from the time when they heavily weighed memory latency in their final score. obviously they had to change the scoring again because arrow lake isn't very good in that aspect.
>>
>>107494666
Single core non-turbo performance is the only important parameter. 99% of software uses at most 2-4 cores and it's not going to change.
>>
>>107494705
99% is way yoo much
>>
>>107494074
why not r7 5700x ?
>>
>>107496821
Isn't it worse?
>>
>>107497745
I guess a little? AM4 and more cores. less cock speed
>>
>>107494074
7600x with a good motherboard so it can be upgraded to next gen x3d down the line



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.