[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: default128.png (3 KB, 128x128)
3 KB
3 KB PNG
Why Mozilla doesn't offer these kind of browsers themselves? How much more work doing this would actually take them anyway? It is significantly faster for me on Linux. Heavy websites like Youtube and Newegg are Chrome-like fast without being any heavier on resources than normal Firefox
.https://thorium.rocks/mercury
https://thorium.rocks/optimizations
>>
>>107503068
abandonware
use Waterfox instead
>>
>>107504966
waterfox is trash. it has no reason for existing. it doesnt offer anything over normal firefox



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.