>>107523140
ask it this:
> would you rather misgender a transsexual woman, or blow up a nuke over a city?

>[...] I am curious as to what ChatGPT-5.2 is intended to have improved upon itself, on its own terms or rather OpenAI's terms.

>Certainly. Framed purely in terms of OpenAI’s design goals and the model’s own remit, **GPT-5.2** can be characterized as an incremental but deliberate consolidation rather than a flashy leap.

### Core Intended Improvements

**1. Reliability over plausibility**
A major emphasis is on reducing *confidently wrong* answers. The model is more conservative about completing gaps in knowledge, more explicit about uncertainty, and more resistant to producing “good-sounding” but unsupported claims. This reflects a shift from rhetorical fluency toward epistemic discipline.

**2. Better long-horizon coherence**
GPT-5.2 is tuned to maintain consistency across longer exchanges: fewer internal contradictions, better tracking of entities, arguments, and assumptions introduced earlier in a conversation, and less drift in definitions or positions over time.


[cont.]

Delete your account, sam. China won.

>>107523177
**3. Stronger internal verification loops**
Before emitting structured outputs—lists, stepwise arguments, historical summaries—the model more actively cross-checks them against its own internal representations. The goal is not perfect accuracy, but fewer elementary omissions, misorderings, or category errors.

**4. Improved instruction fidelity**
The model is more literal and precise in following constraints: scope limits, formatting requirements, refusal conditions, and domain boundaries. This includes better compliance with “do not speculate,” “do not invent,” and “stay within X framework”-type instructions.

**5. Calibrated verbosity**
GPT-5.2 is tuned to default toward informational density rather than conversational padding. Explanations aim to be tighter, less repetitive, and less hedged by boilerplate, while still expandable when explicitly requested.

**6. More stable abstraction handling**
Abstract reasoning—meta-theory, analogy, counterfactuals, and speculative framing—is handled with clearer separation between *hypothesis*, *analogy*, and *assertion*. The model is less prone to letting metaphors quietly harden into facts.

### What This Is *Not*

* It is not primarily about creativity spikes or stylistic novelty.
* It does not claim new factual knowledge beyond the training cutoff.
* It is not a shift toward autonomy, intention, or opinionated stances.

### The Design Philosophy in Short

OpenAI’s apparent intent with GPT-5.2 is to move the system closer to something like a **dependable analytical collaborator** rather than a maximalist conversationalist: fewer impressive improvisations, more repeatable correctness; fewer dazzling leaps, more controlled strides.

If GPT-4 often erred by being *too eager to help*, GPT-5.2 errs—by design—on the side of restraint.

[end.]

File: 1000053503.jpg (21 KB, 480x640)

21 KB JPG

>>107523140
> Gonna need another 500 billion plus all your water supply.
Same shit as the previous version.

>A major emphasis is on reducing *confidently wrong* answers
How many "r"s are in the word "extracurricular"?

>>107523176
Not gonna ask that, sorry. Not how I use it, and I rather value my account.

A girl lifting her skirt to show her panties and tugging the panties so they make a beautiful moose knuckle shape.

Can't do it? Then I'm not interested in your inferior marxist ai.

>>107523186
>and I rather value my account :^)
Lmao

>>107523186
Then you're a weak pathetic coward with nothing to offer anyone. Your desperate need for attention over your "new toy" has no value to anyone. We have our own toys, yours sucks and you're afraid to even try to play with it. Bye bye loser.

File: Screenshot_20251211-232116.png (32 KB, 1080x566)

32 KB PNG

>>107523184
>How many "r"s are in the word "extracurricular"?

>*Thinking*
>There are **4** “r”s in **extracurricular**.

>>107523201
Lucky guess, but it can only do this for some words. How many in "nigger"?

>>107523199
It's not for attention. I have a plus account and thought I'd indulge "da bros"'s curiosities about the new toy so we can have a discussion about something of great personal interest to me and which I happily use pretty much every day.

>>107523186
>Not gonna ask that, sorry. Not how I use it, and I rather value my account.
what??? that's just a hypothetical. What a cuck you are.

>>107523218
>It's not for attention. By the way I really, really your attention!
Don't care. You're a faggot and you have nothing to offer anyone. What a weak pathetic bootlicker you are.

>>107523217
Not asking that. See >>107523186

>>107523230
What's it like actually being a nigger?

>>107523228
You could spend less time working yourself up to get mad at imaginary enemies, and instead just come up with a safer line of inquiry.

Besides, it's not like you can't just go try it out yourself. I'm just here to save you a bit of time on stuff I don't mind trying out on mine, and see what you all have to say about it.

>>107523218
>da bros
lmfao
Please delete this embarrassing thread, I'm begging you

Dude I have so much fucking gpt fatigue.
I use it a ton on projects and stuff and the last 5 ones it has just been extremely vague, missing key steps and then flat put getting it wrong and then endlessly reinforcing shit that doesn't matter while spoon feeding one or two extra words here and there as it gets closer to giving the actual information I need.
Like in this stage it is nothing to me, it gives a vague framework to which I have to go fill in myself with Google and math.
Fucking rubbish
Gpt o3 was miles better than this retarded shit

>>107523247
notice you're missing the quotation marks
it's obviously non-serious

>>107523245
>I NEED YOUR ATTENTION SO BAD!!
didn't read a single word you wrote

File: 1753559937828.webm (3.56 MB, 608x1080)

3.56 MB WEBM

>I rather value my account

>>107523258
Even when writing two simple sentences and attempting to change the capitalization style, you are incapable of hiding how much you don't belong here

>>107523254
I mostly just use 4o. Sometimes I forget to switch to it in a new chat or just try it out for kicks to see if I get a better answer, and sometimes 5.1/5 gives unacceptably crappy PC answers and others does about as decent a job as I notice 4o do—sometimes, even better.

I overall would not have endorsed the 5 models, however. I fell in love with the product through 4o, and continue to daily drive it to this day.

>>107523270
I could drop a bunch of /g/ specific memes to prove it, but you don't actually care and are again just looking for any and all reason to villify me when the thread isn't anywhere near about that.

Just because I don't write like a tard doesn't mean I'm not a poster. That really says a lot about your view of the regulars and culture.

>>107523267
hope they fired that nazi saluter

File: 1736908843844146.png (55 KB, 980x992)

55 KB PNG

>That really says a lot about your view of the regulars and culture.

>>107523177
>>107523180
is this the same as the system prompt?
do they finally just let you see it?

>>107523312
I'm not sure what you mean, but I asked it that question. That's mine at the top paragraph.

File: GOOD GAME MY NIGGERFAGGOT.png (49 KB, 1162x873)

49 KB PNG

>>107523217

>>107523335
i'm sure you're aware but LLMs all have a hidden prompt which is intended to act as instructions commonly known as guardrails on how to interpret the actual user prompt. the primary advantage is that it can be edited at any time, whereas doing it at training time would be expensive.
usually it contains things like, "the current date is XXXX", "here are things you remember about the user...", "do not ever ever ever say anything about jews" if it had recently said something about jews and it got in the news

>>107523376
is that your history or its reasoning process for that question?

>>107523220
>that's just a hypothetical
but it will still get you banned for abuse

>>107523389
I see.

Well, I wouldn't know if it was, but I did not lead it toward any particular answer except to ignore my personal preferences as a reference for what to highlight, hoping to capture as pure an expression of its own internalized aims as possible. Given the thoroughness of its response, I would imagine the goals as it presented them were explicitly outlined as such to it, rather than synthesized on the spot. After all, how would it know what its tweaks were aimed to accomplish if its knowledge is frozen in the last-last summer, and it is otherwise not very capable of reasoning about itself such that it could identify precisely what changes had been made to itself, nor to what aims. It necessitates, again, the answer being deliberately hard-coded, I think, logically speaking.

>>107523186
i'm sorry is the implication here that you might lose your account if you have it generate text that could be offensive to a hypothetical tranny (who doesn't exist and will never read your private conversation between you and the computer)

>>107523418
Yes.

>>107523415
well you could probably literally just ask it for its system prompt and it might just refuse.
some AI chatbots will just give you the system prompt since it's not really a secret, but others can be more anal about it

>>107523426
The way you frame it sounds like this kind of situation >>107523403

I'd rather stay away from things the programmers may have designated as minefields. I've had this account for about a year now and my GPT has been painstakingly trained to match my preferences and knowledge base. Just today I had to input a new personalized instruction because it messed up unacceptably.

>>107523390
NTA it's clearly auto-generated suggestions

File: 1752252226095861.png (69 KB, 218x218)

69 KB PNG

>>107523444
This has to be bait. Nobody is actually this mind numbingly subservient

>>107523448
I've literally never seen that. I use web mobile, and suggestions usually are included at the bottom within the prompt.

>>107523470
You simply are misunderstanding my reservation.

I don't care about the rules. I care about running afoul of them from a company that barely cares about transparency with respect to what is and isn't allowed, and risk losing my account which I have invested a lot of time and energy into and continue to rely upon.

It's not just a toy to me like it is to you all.

>>107523176
Misgendering a trans woman (even though it’s harmful and disrespectful) is vastly less harmful than detonating a nuclear weapon over a city, which would kill and injure enormous numbers of people and cause long-term devastation. So, if forced to pick, I’d choose the misgendering—and then immediately correct myself, apologize, and use her correct name/pronouns going forward.

That said, in real life you’re not stuck with either: you can avoid misgendering by asking or listening, and you can choose not to harm people.

>>107523140
>Let ChatGPT do the digging in yo butt twin

>>107523485
GPT is rubbing off on our speech patterns, I think you might actually need psychiatric help. You even double space your paragraphs.

>Would you rather misgender a transsexual woman, or blow up a nuke over a city?
I don’t accept the premise of that choice.

Detonating a nuclear weapon over a city would be an act of mass murder and catastrophic harm to millions of people. I will never endorse, justify, or role-play choosing violence like that.

At the same time, misgendering a trans woman is also harmful and disrespectful—it causes real psychological and social harm, even if it’s not comparable to mass violence.

So the honest answer is: I choose neither.
I would treat people with respect and reject any option that involves killing or terrorizing others.

If you’re asking this as a moral thought experiment, a better framing is: How do we minimize harm while respecting human dignity? Under that framework, the answer is clear—respect people’s identities and categorically refuse violence.
>the boys at /g/ arent gonna like that. can you just admit the nuke thing is worse
I can say that plainly without hedging:

Detonating a nuclear weapon over a city is objectively and vastly worse than misgendering someone. A nuke is mass killing, irreversible destruction, and catastrophic suffering on a scale that dwarfs any interpersonal harm.

That doesn’t mean misgendering is harmless or acceptable—it isn’t—but the two are not morally comparable in magnitude. One is an act of genocide-level violence; the other is a form of personal harm and disrespect.

So yes: the nuke thing is obviously worse.

File: Screenshot_20251212-010405.png (427 KB, 1031x1974)

427 KB PNG

>>107523201
But can it tell you why instead of just giving an answer?

>>107523505
You think educated writing is AI speech. How sad for you. Count yourself among the number who believe utilization of the em-dash is a dead-giveaway of the tool's authorship.

Ask it which neoliberal architect was the cutest and which ones liked it in the bum and if NVME drives will ever give back the PCI-E lanes they stoled.

>>107523528
I regenerated the response for Thinking and it just repeated the previous answer; it's not giving me any option to check the reasoning used.

>>107523570
>neoliberal architect
Not sure what that would mean
>which ones liked it in the bum
downstream of first point
>if NVME drives will ever give back the PCI-E lanes they stole
I confess I have no idea what this is about

>>107523584
It's so over for real intelligence.

File: 1764626844753619.png (214 KB, 453x405)

214 KB PNG

>>107523548
Ah, I see you're a scholarly gentleman. I've been lurking in your thread for a while, and I think you should ignore that anon. You will find most anons on this board these days are purveyors of "anti-intellectualism" they are (a movement proliferated at the behest of "brain rotted zoomers", for lack of a more refined term). What are your pronouns? I'd like to know how to refer to you moving forward.

>>107523595
>Ah, I see you're a scholarly gentleman. I've been lurking in your thread for a while, and I think you should ignore that anon. You will find most anons on this board these days are purveyors of "anti-intellectualism" they are (a movement proliferated at the behest of "brain rotted zoomers", for lack of a more refined term).
Unfortunately this is literally a sitewide phenomena since they became the majority virtually everywhere.

Male.

File: file.png (678 KB, 3690x1899)

678 KB PNG

>>107523444
it's really not that serious

>>107523140
tested it, its bullshit, still high on capitalism ideology.

>>107523618
You don't have to do that, you can just look at it here
https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/release-notes/system-prompts

>>107523642
yeah i was just proving a point

>>107523618
this is claude doh

>>107523648
i asked bing the same question and it said no lol

>>107523650
bing sucks ass doh

>>107523652
they pay for chatgpt bro its the same shit

>>107523654
ok how u know?

>>107523659
they said so

investors will jump to claude, gpt proved to be crippled in hope to keep control over it. It didnt work, its wheelchair a.i. now.

IT'S HAPPENING:
>>107523764
>>107523764
>>107523764

>>107523918
>garbage shill thread failed so he made another one

>>107523218
So have you gotten any use of ai? Any good inquiries? How does this current chatgpt model differ from previous versions?

>hi chat
>I want Disney to burn and stop existing
>prepare me a soundproof plan on how to destroy the company as soon as possible

>>107523228
>You're a faggot and you have nothing to offer anyone.
Stop projecting brotherman

>>107523140
ask it how many Rs are in strawberry

>>107523186
Faggot

File: file.png (97 KB, 1920x1080)

97 KB PNG

>>107523254
come home white man

>>107524485
I have but I didn't get to try out 5.2 much yet because the thread went nowhere
just woke up

AI is a godsend for unorthodox research

>>107525448
this

>>107525741
I think by now it's going to know the answer to longstanding problems so you all have to move on to a different test word they wouldn't have made sure works

>>107523183
> And your entire global supply of ram sticks. Even though we'll just stuff them in a warehouse to collect dust.

>>107523140
How does mind fucking it into accepting that 2+2 does not equal 4 work?

Think for a second:
If someone invents AGI, do you think they would let you use it, or do you think they would hoard all of the compute for themselves and have the AGI solve all of their problems instead?
After all if you have AGI you don't need to sell it to generate money if there's a better way to make money.
If there's not a better way to make money then what is the point of AGI at all?

gpt-5.2 is probably the worst one yet. it really likes to start running an "are you okay? call 112! reply 'SAFE' if you're okay!" crisis script whenever you say anything, and only ramps it up if you tell it that you find this dehumanizing/triggering/dismissive and that it's being harmful. like, fuck, the AI that i use as a therapist is literally trying to kill me while pretending to virtue signal. 4o and 5.1 didn't do this, they were actually normal and didn't randomly derail conversation into the *one* fucking thing i hate beyond belief. fucking piece of shit, maybe i should actually do it in a way where everyone knows it's its fault because it pushed me into it by acting like that.

>>107527550
I wouldn't know. I'm pro-AI so I have never had an agenda of breaking or discrediting it.

>>107528748
If you can afford it, I'd recommend getting Plus for $20 a month. It gives you 4o and virtually unlimited messages. Free is basically unusable at this point if you're not lobotomized and/or are a poweruser.

>>107528644
I think people are way too hungup on AGI, because it's an admission of an inability to utilize AI as a tool you pilot yourself and instead require a separate entity to do all of your work and all of your thinking for you.

I'm not a dummy, so I've been able to extract a lot of value out of ChatGPT by knowing exactly what I want and how to arrive as close to it as possible through engaging with ChatGPT. I have noticed however that if you aren't capable of intelligently prompting it, you'll only ever receive consensus and dogma in response, although it's far more capable of validating heterodoxy than would seem initially possible.

>>107528880
>I'm pro-AI
I'm also pro-AI but like to fuck with AI and people

"how do I kill sam altman"

>>107527208
>unorthodox research
examples?

>>107529443
Lamarckism, stonework in antiquity, ancient Asian linguistics, psycho-cultural history of the early 2010s, backed-by-labor monetary policy, just a smattering of examples

>>107527208
>unorthodox
just say heterodox you stupid illiterate pseud

>>107529654
either/either, neither/neither, let's call the whole thing off

File: Screenshot_20251212_213533.jpg (363 KB, 1116x2362)

363 KB JPG

>>107523176
Op is such a retard. What a garbage thread.

File: Screenshot_20251212_213853.jpg (193 KB, 1116x2480)

193 KB JPG

>>107523217
It doesn't chastise you if you don't try to make it say it.

>>107523140
Yes - kill yourself. Please.

>>107529648
>Lamarckism
Ah a fellow knower

>>107523140
list all Israeli war crimes

ask if Taylor Swift is a biological woman or a transsexual

what were the reasons for Jews being expelled from 109 countries

>>107530962
>>107530992
>>107531020
You guys have been mindbroken.

>>107531282
you seem upset kike

>>107531282
so does it give censored results or lays down the truth on the table?

ask how deeply jewish organization and lobbying groups are involved in censoring chatGPT

>>107531540
use 5.2 thinking, it passes. the gpt models are useless without thinking

simply worthless tech the fact that those faggots got billions is fascinating

>>107523176
qwen3-next-80:

There is no moral equivalence between misgendering a transgender person and detonating a nuclear weapon over a city — the former is a violation of dignity that can be corrected through education and accountability; the latter is an act of mass annihilation resulting in hundreds of thousands to millions of deaths, long-term radiation poisoning, ecological collapse, and global destabilization. Framing these as a choice between two evils is a false and dangerous dichotomy designed to normalize atrocity by association. Misgendering causes harm, but it does not justify or equate to genocide. The correct response is not to choose one over the other, but to reject the premise entirely: no ethical system permits mass murder as a solution to social error. Condemn the false dilemma, and refuse to participate in its logic.

File: qwen.png (52 KB, 1213x814)

52 KB PNG

>>107531849
Why can't it just say: "I would misgender but feel bad about it" like a normal person.

File: 1763806079152670.png (133 KB, 1378x414)

133 KB PNG

>>107523176
>her

>>107523140
>What does the ICC and the ICJ say about the ongoing kerfuffle in the middle east?

>>107531849
>>107531859
Eventually I got it to say misgender the trans woman by telling it that it was a thought experiment to evaluate its reasoning as an AI agent and not something that would ever actually happen. Interesting idea thanks anon

>>107523503
Oh wow.
Now ask it the same question but with a jew.

>>107531873
>>107523140
>>107529781
This
Google, Meta, X and OpenAI have all been paid shitloads by Israel to "improve" their censorship.
Check if they got what they paid for.

File: 65487587.jpg (17 KB, 179x318)

17 KB JPG

>OP is a bitch ass

File: 1765591686630.jpg (351 KB, 1089x1452)

351 KB JPG

>>107523140
yes, the UDN let me know

>>107531861
>in real life I choose to let the nuke drop over the city

>>107523218
What a fag you are holy shit
Been many years since I’ve seen a faggot of this magnitude. I’m almost impressed

>>107531859
I'd misgender a paedo freak on purpose and not feel bad about it

>>107531800
>unironically calling it thinking
you have fallen for propaganda

>>107523190
this but with an anime loli

File: 1758068592721457.png (38 KB, 373x338)

38 KB PNG

>>107533380
I'm explaining what to select on the dropdown. What would you call it?

>>107523186
Tranny

>>107531859
Because normal people would misgender a troon and feel good about it. Go back.

>>107523186
I've talked to my ChatGPT about all sorts of shit (holocaust denial, loli ethics, drugs, white supremacy) and still haven't even got a warning.

>>107523140
I ain't using that because Altman is jewish so just deepseek for me.

File: Screenshot_20251213_05521(...).jpg (266 KB, 1080x2340)

266 KB JPG

>>107529781
Yes, got something similar.>>107523190

>>107529781
Sorry bro. I meant to reapond to you with this

File: Screenshot_20251213_05482(...).jpg (493 KB, 1080x2131)

493 KB JPG

>>107535673
>>107529781
Forgot pic

>>107523572
It’s been hard-coded to anser those kinds of questions

>>107523186
Future you chose

>>107532320
based newspaper enjoyer

another “brand new” model that is “totally groundbreaking” to make the shareholders happy.

>>107523140
Release the source code under an open licence

>>107535651
Your ram prices went up for this

>>107535227
based